Show new navigation
On
  • Help
    • Help
    • Help Center
    • Data dictionary
    • EF&W Program documents
    • Request support
    • Send feedback
      • View all help topics
Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program
  • Mitigation work
    Mitigation work View all mitigation work topics
  • Reporting
    Reporting View all reporting topics
  • Funding
    Funding View all funding topics
  • Search

Assessment Summary

View the details of the 2008 FCRPS BiOp Workgroup Assessment for this project as part of the RME / AP Category Review.

BIOP Assessment 2008-471-00-BIOP-20101105
Assessment Number: 2008-471-00-BIOP-20101105
Project Number: 2008-471-00
Review: RME / AP Category Review
Proposal Number: RMECAT-2008-471-00
Completed Date: None
2008 FCRPS BiOp Workgroup Rating: Response Requested
Comments: BiOp Workgroup Comments:
Although the monitoring does not pose a conflict with RPA needs; resulting actions in out-years to test hypothesis may detrimentally impact ongoing ISEMP studies in the Entiat and other UC watershed stream reaches. Further coordination with ISEMP staff on control and treatment reaches needs to be identified if this work is implemented in the UC. (Please Respond as to how you are coordinating with the ISEMP studies)

Please identify:
1. Why your data is "not electronically available"; and
2. What data sets will not be "electronically available" for various deliverables. Please specify the deliverable that is not electronically available. (Note a data set includes the raw data collected and additional data on analysis). For example if there is a deliverable for population adult abundance or habitat, we expect your raw and synthesized data to be made available electronically.
- Your response may help BPA identify funding needs for data repositories or identify an existing data warehouse that your data could be stored.

The BiOp RM&E Workgroups made the following determinations regarding the proposal's ability or need to support BiOp Research, Monitoring and Evaluation (RME) RPAs. If you have questions regarding these RPA association conclusions, please contact your BPA COTR and they will help clarify, or they will arrange further discussion with the appropriate RM&E Workgroup Leads. BiOp RPA associations for the proposed work are: (56.1 56.2)
All Questionable RPA Associations ( ) and
All Deleted RPA Associations ( )
Proponent Response:

I have already met with the ISEMP coordiantor (Pamela Nelle) about these issues. At this point there is no ISEMP work being done in the Twisp River, the only immediate planned study tribuatary for this project. I will continue to coordiate with ISEMP on all matters concerning project impacts.

Data is not currently stored online, but will be available electronicly.