A |
EC |
Environmental compliance requirements complete |
5/1/2023 |
9/30/2023 |
Concluded |
Anne Creason |
7/13/2023 7:23:40 AM |
|
Description: On-the-ground work associated with this work element cannot proceed until this milestone is complete. Milestone is complete when final documentation is received from BPA environmental compliance staff. |
B |
Design2 |
Contact EC lead to determine compliance strategy |
5/1/2023 |
6/1/2023 |
Concluded |
Anne Creason |
7/13/2023 7:23:40 AM |
|
Description: Contact EC Lead to determine compliance strategy and EC review requirements. |
C |
Design8 |
Cultural resource clearance initiated |
5/1/2023 |
9/30/2023 |
Concluded |
Anne Creason |
7/13/2023 7:23:40 AM |
|
Description: If planning or design work requires ground disturbance including but not limited to geotechnical surveys, ground water monitoring, or well exploration, obtain appropriate cultural resources consultation prior to any ground disturbance. Notify EC Lead well in advance of ground disturbing work. On-the-ground work associated with this work element may not proceed until this milestone is complete. Milestone is complete when BPA environmental compliance staff provides final documentation. |
D |
Suggested |
Provide projected construction start date to BPA COR and EC |
5/1/2023 |
5/1/2023 |
Concluded |
Anne Creason |
7/13/2023 7:23:40 AM |
|
Description: Provide month and year of projected construction start date to assist in project planning, environmental compliance, planning and design review timelines. Provide during conceptual design stage and no later than 15% design. Include in WE description if possible. |
E |
Design3 |
Develop and submit project concepts (typically 15% design) for review |
5/1/2023 |
5/1/2023 |
Concluded |
Anne Creason |
7/13/2023 7:23:40 AM |
|
Description: Develop conceptual strategy, restoration approach, and/or preliminary design. Submit conceptual design and expected construction start date to the COR and EC Lead for review. Reviews shall include COR, EC, and ETS. EC Lead to determine other reviews as needed. Allow one month for review.
At 15%, coordinate with BPA to schedule a site visit to review project concepts, goals, and objectives. . A typical site visit will include review of limiting factors and pertinent studies or reports that document restoration targets for implementation. Additional data that may be presented and reviewed (e.g., high resolution aerial photography, topographic maps, soil maps, or GIS/CAD data layers). |
F |
Design4 |
Develop and submit preferred alternative (typically 30%) for review |
5/1/2023 |
6/30/2023 |
Concluded |
Anne Creason |
7/13/2023 7:23:40 AM |
|
Description: Develop preferred alternative design and cost estimate. Submit plans, draft Basis of Design Report (BDR), and other supporting documentation (profiles, details, cross sections, quantities, technical analyses/appendixes, etc.) to the COR and EC Lead. Schedule time for review (typically one month for NOAA/USFWS and BPA review).
The 30% design should incorporate technical comments and recommendations from previous review and shall address design requirements provided by BPA in the BDR template. |
G |
Design5 |
Determine cost estimate, permitting, construction, and M&E |
5/1/2023 |
6/30/2023 |
Concluded |
Anne Creason |
7/13/2023 7:23:40 AM |
|
Description: All designs shall include an engineer's construction estimate (including, but not limited to): volume of materials and cost per volume, hours and rates for each person, equipment hours and rates, delivery costs, travel and per diem costs, and supplies |
H |
Design6 |
Develop and submit permit-ready designs (typically 60% to 80%) for review |
5/1/2023 |
9/30/2023 |
Concluded |
Anne Creason |
7/13/2023 7:23:40 AM |
|
Description: Develop and submit permit ready designs to the COR and EC Lead. Schedule time for review, typically one month for NOAA/USFWS and BPA review.
Provide 80% designs for final technical, functional, and NMFS/USFWS review. The 80% design shall incorporate technical comments and recommendations from previous design reviews. 80% design submittals should include near-final drawings and specifications, site locations, site plans, profiles, cross sections, details, construction quantities, implementation resource plans, and design technical analyses as summarized in a Basis of Design Report. If technical requirements are not met, additional review may be necessary. |
I |
Design7 |
Submit completed landowner agreement |
5/1/2023 |
9/30/2023 |
Concluded |
Anne Creason |
7/13/2023 7:23:40 AM |
|
Description: Submit landowner agreement to BPA that documents acknowledgement/ approval of project. The COR can provide an agreement template. |
J |
|
30% Designs |
5/1/2023 |
8/31/2023 |
Concluded |
Anne Creason |
7/13/2023 7:23:40 AM |
|
Description: The Estuary Partnership shall develop 30% designs for the MCMNA Floodplain Project which consist of preliminary design plans (drawings), preliminary design report, preliminary construction quantities, and preliminary construction cost estimate (Preliminary Design Package). The Estuary Partnership shall base the Preliminary Design Package on criteria found in the HIP IV Handbook, specifically, the General Project and Data Summary Requirements (GPDSR) for the design report. Temporary Erosion Sediment Control (TESC) Plan and construction technical specifications are not required at this level of design.
The Crabapple Creek Culvert Replacement action is included in Part 2 of this project and will not be included as part of this milestone. |
K |
|
Feasibility Assessment of Crabapple Creek Crossing |
5/1/2023 |
9/30/2023 |
Concluded |
Anne Creason |
7/13/2023 7:23:40 AM |
|
Description: The Estuary Partnership shall assess the feasibility of improving fish passage and hydrologic connection at the Crabapple Creek Crossing under Route 30 and PNWR railroad.
The assessment will include:
• Perform preliminary hydrologic and biologic analysis to determine passage needs for various species at this location.
• Identify crossing geometry requirements based on passage needs.
• Evaluate two (2) different structure types, (culverts, and bridges) that will satisfy passage and geometry requirements.
• Evaluate construction methods and sequencing for either structure type.
• Evaluate two (2) alignment configurations.
• Evaluate other infrastructure related design elements including site grading, traffic control, utility relocation(s), roadway restoration, and railroad restoration.
The feasibility report will include concept figures depicting up to four site scale plan views of two feasible crossing configurations with cost estimates. |
L |
|
Present 60% designs to ERTG |
6/1/2023 |
9/30/2023 |
Concluded |
Anne Creason |
7/13/2023 7:23:40 AM |
|
Description: LCEP will present design to Expert Regional Technical Group (ERTG) for preliminary Project Benefit Unit (PBU) score. |
M |
DELIV |
MCNA--Produce Draft 60% Designs |
|
9/30/2023 |
Concluded |
Anne Creason |
7/13/2023 7:23:40 AM |
|
Description: The Contractor shall base all 60% designs on criteria found in the HIP IV Handbook, specifically, the General Project and Data Summary Requirements (GPDSR) for the design report. Designs shall include a Temporary Erosion Sediment Control (TESC) Plan and sufficient detail to submit permit applications. Construction technical specifications are not required at this level of design. Crabapple Creek Crossing is not included in this deliverable. |