Show new navigation
On
  • Help
    • Help
    • Help Center
    • Data dictionary
    • EF&W Program documents
    • Request support
    • Send feedback
      • View all help topics
Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program
  • Mitigation work
    Mitigation work View all mitigation work topics
  • Reporting
    Reporting View all reporting topics
  • Funding
    Funding View all funding topics
  • Search

Milestones Summary

Contract 41081: 2003-011-00 EXP COLUMBIA R/ESTUARY HABITAT (PILE)
Viewing 57 of 57 Milestones
Sort Order
WE ID
Work Element Name
Title
Description
Sort
Type
Title
Start
End
Status
Modified By
Modified Date
A185Produce CBFish Status ReportPeriodic Status Reports for BPAThe Contractor shall report on the status of milestones and deliverables in Pisces. Reports shall be completed either monthly or quarterly as determined by the BPA COTR. Additionally, when indicating a deliverable milestone as COMPLETE, the contractor shall provide metrics and the final location (latitude and longitude) prior to submitting the report to the BPA COTR.ASRJan-Mar 2009 (1/1/2009 - 3/31/2009)04/01/200904/15/2009ConcludedTracey Yerxa (Inactive)11/12/2009 7:59 AM
A185Produce CBFish Status ReportPeriodic Status Reports for BPAThe Contractor shall report on the status of milestones and deliverables in Pisces. Reports shall be completed either monthly or quarterly as determined by the BPA COTR. Additionally, when indicating a deliverable milestone as COMPLETE, the contractor shall provide metrics and the final location (latitude and longitude) prior to submitting the report to the BPA COTR.BSRApr-Jun 2009 (4/1/2009 - 6/30/2009)07/01/200907/15/2009ConcludedTracey Yerxa (Inactive)11/12/2009 7:59 AM
A185Produce CBFish Status ReportPeriodic Status Reports for BPAThe Contractor shall report on the status of milestones and deliverables in Pisces. Reports shall be completed either monthly or quarterly as determined by the BPA COTR. Additionally, when indicating a deliverable milestone as COMPLETE, the contractor shall provide metrics and the final location (latitude and longitude) prior to submitting the report to the BPA COTR.CSRJul-Sep 2009 (7/1/2009 - 9/30/2009)10/01/200910/15/2009ConcludedTracey Yerxa (Inactive)11/12/2009 7:59 AM
A185Produce CBFish Status ReportPeriodic Status Reports for BPAThe Contractor shall report on the status of milestones and deliverables in Pisces. Reports shall be completed either monthly or quarterly as determined by the BPA COTR. Additionally, when indicating a deliverable milestone as COMPLETE, the contractor shall provide metrics and the final location (latitude and longitude) prior to submitting the report to the BPA COTR.DSROct-Dec 2009 (10/1/2009 - 12/31/2009)01/01/201001/15/2010ConcludedSuzanne Frye (Inactive)11/13/2009 2:14 PM
A185Produce CBFish Status ReportPeriodic Status Reports for BPAThe Contractor shall report on the status of milestones and deliverables in Pisces. Reports shall be completed either monthly or quarterly as determined by the BPA COTR. Additionally, when indicating a deliverable milestone as COMPLETE, the contractor shall provide metrics and the final location (latitude and longitude) prior to submitting the report to the BPA COTR.ESRFinal Jan-Feb 2010 (1/1/2010 - 2/27/2010)02/13/201002/27/2010ConcludedSuzanne Frye (Inactive)11/13/2009 2:14 PM
B114Identify and Select ProjectsIdentify Priority Pile Structure Modification ProjectsUsing data collected in previous work, the AAs will work with the Estuary Partnership, the Estuary Partnership's Science Workgroup Pile Subcommittee (SWG Pile Subcommittee) and regional experts to identify one or two pilot modification projects. In Year 2007-2008 a list of eight to ten pile structures were identified collaboratively by the AAs, Estuary Partnership, SWG Pile Subcommittee, and regional experts as potential pilot projects for modification. Each pilot project was scored based on the draft project prioritization criteria and is paired with a description describing the hypotheses that can be tested through pile structure removal as well as the potential ecological benefits and challenges associated with removal. Through field visits, landowner outreach, and additional research the AAs, Estuary Partnership, SWG Pile Subcommittee and regional experts will develop a subset of one to two potential pilot projects that will be investigated for near term implementation subsequent to the Coal Creek Slough pilot project. Emphasis will be placed on project feasibility and the following considerations: • Potential ecological benefits • Sites that represent the diversity of testable hypotheses (water quality, predation, sediment processes, etc.) • Historical importance and community support • Low risk of negative impacts resulting from removal (i.e. erosion, contaminant entrainment, etc. • Modification logistics (mobilization, equipment access, disposal) The Estuary Partnership and the AAs will determine how many, where, and who will participate in all field visits conducted under this contract or relating to the AAs Pile Structure Program. Participants could include AA staff, management and contractors, regional technical experts, scientists, elected officials, members or staff of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (Council), and/or others. The AAs and the Estuary Partnership will meet periodically to collaboratively make decisions and plan field visits.A Develop One to Two Potential Pilot Projects09/15/200801/15/2009ConcludedTracey Yerxa (Inactive)11/12/2009 7:59 AM
B114Identify and Select ProjectsIdentify Priority Pile Structure Modification ProjectsUsing data collected in previous work, the AAs will work with the Estuary Partnership, the Estuary Partnership's Science Workgroup Pile Subcommittee (SWG Pile Subcommittee) and regional experts to identify one or two pilot modification projects. In Year 2007-2008 a list of eight to ten pile structures were identified collaboratively by the AAs, Estuary Partnership, SWG Pile Subcommittee, and regional experts as potential pilot projects for modification. Each pilot project was scored based on the draft project prioritization criteria and is paired with a description describing the hypotheses that can be tested through pile structure removal as well as the potential ecological benefits and challenges associated with removal. Through field visits, landowner outreach, and additional research the AAs, Estuary Partnership, SWG Pile Subcommittee and regional experts will develop a subset of one to two potential pilot projects that will be investigated for near term implementation subsequent to the Coal Creek Slough pilot project. Emphasis will be placed on project feasibility and the following considerations: • Potential ecological benefits • Sites that represent the diversity of testable hypotheses (water quality, predation, sediment processes, etc.) • Historical importance and community support • Low risk of negative impacts resulting from removal (i.e. erosion, contaminant entrainment, etc. • Modification logistics (mobilization, equipment access, disposal) The Estuary Partnership and the AAs will determine how many, where, and who will participate in all field visits conducted under this contract or relating to the AAs Pile Structure Program. Participants could include AA staff, management and contractors, regional technical experts, scientists, elected officials, members or staff of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (Council), and/or others. The AAs and the Estuary Partnership will meet periodically to collaboratively make decisions and plan field visits.B Project Review by the Estuary Partnership Science Work Group Subcommittee10/15/200802/01/2009ConcludedTracey Yerxa (Inactive)11/12/2009 7:59 AM
B114Identify and Select ProjectsIdentify Priority Pile Structure Modification ProjectsUsing data collected in previous work, the AAs will work with the Estuary Partnership, the Estuary Partnership's Science Workgroup Pile Subcommittee (SWG Pile Subcommittee) and regional experts to identify one or two pilot modification projects. In Year 2007-2008 a list of eight to ten pile structures were identified collaboratively by the AAs, Estuary Partnership, SWG Pile Subcommittee, and regional experts as potential pilot projects for modification. Each pilot project was scored based on the draft project prioritization criteria and is paired with a description describing the hypotheses that can be tested through pile structure removal as well as the potential ecological benefits and challenges associated with removal. Through field visits, landowner outreach, and additional research the AAs, Estuary Partnership, SWG Pile Subcommittee and regional experts will develop a subset of one to two potential pilot projects that will be investigated for near term implementation subsequent to the Coal Creek Slough pilot project. Emphasis will be placed on project feasibility and the following considerations: • Potential ecological benefits • Sites that represent the diversity of testable hypotheses (water quality, predation, sediment processes, etc.) • Historical importance and community support • Low risk of negative impacts resulting from removal (i.e. erosion, contaminant entrainment, etc. • Modification logistics (mobilization, equipment access, disposal) The Estuary Partnership and the AAs will determine how many, where, and who will participate in all field visits conducted under this contract or relating to the AAs Pile Structure Program. Participants could include AA staff, management and contractors, regional technical experts, scientists, elected officials, members or staff of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (Council), and/or others. The AAs and the Estuary Partnership will meet periodically to collaboratively make decisions and plan field visits.C AA Approval of Pilot Project Selection and Funding09/15/200811/15/2009ConcludedTracey Yerxa (Inactive)11/12/2009 7:59 AM
B114Identify and Select ProjectsIdentify Priority Pile Structure Modification ProjectsUsing data collected in previous work, the AAs will work with the Estuary Partnership, the Estuary Partnership's Science Workgroup Pile Subcommittee (SWG Pile Subcommittee) and regional experts to identify one or two pilot modification projects. In Year 2007-2008 a list of eight to ten pile structures were identified collaboratively by the AAs, Estuary Partnership, SWG Pile Subcommittee, and regional experts as potential pilot projects for modification. Each pilot project was scored based on the draft project prioritization criteria and is paired with a description describing the hypotheses that can be tested through pile structure removal as well as the potential ecological benefits and challenges associated with removal. Through field visits, landowner outreach, and additional research the AAs, Estuary Partnership, SWG Pile Subcommittee and regional experts will develop a subset of one to two potential pilot projects that will be investigated for near term implementation subsequent to the Coal Creek Slough pilot project. Emphasis will be placed on project feasibility and the following considerations: • Potential ecological benefits • Sites that represent the diversity of testable hypotheses (water quality, predation, sediment processes, etc.) • Historical importance and community support • Low risk of negative impacts resulting from removal (i.e. erosion, contaminant entrainment, etc. • Modification logistics (mobilization, equipment access, disposal) The Estuary Partnership and the AAs will determine how many, where, and who will participate in all field visits conducted under this contract or relating to the AAs Pile Structure Program. Participants could include AA staff, management and contractors, regional technical experts, scientists, elected officials, members or staff of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (Council), and/or others. The AAs and the Estuary Partnership will meet periodically to collaboratively make decisions and plan field visits.D Submit Draft and Final Report to BPA Project Manager08/15/200911/15/2009ConcludedTracey Yerxa (Inactive)11/12/2009 7:59 AM
B114Identify and Select ProjectsIdentify Priority Pile Structure Modification ProjectsUsing data collected in previous work, the AAs will work with the Estuary Partnership, the Estuary Partnership's Science Workgroup Pile Subcommittee (SWG Pile Subcommittee) and regional experts to identify one or two pilot modification projects. In Year 2007-2008 a list of eight to ten pile structures were identified collaboratively by the AAs, Estuary Partnership, SWG Pile Subcommittee, and regional experts as potential pilot projects for modification. Each pilot project was scored based on the draft project prioritization criteria and is paired with a description describing the hypotheses that can be tested through pile structure removal as well as the potential ecological benefits and challenges associated with removal. Through field visits, landowner outreach, and additional research the AAs, Estuary Partnership, SWG Pile Subcommittee and regional experts will develop a subset of one to two potential pilot projects that will be investigated for near term implementation subsequent to the Coal Creek Slough pilot project. Emphasis will be placed on project feasibility and the following considerations: • Potential ecological benefits • Sites that represent the diversity of testable hypotheses (water quality, predation, sediment processes, etc.) • Historical importance and community support • Low risk of negative impacts resulting from removal (i.e. erosion, contaminant entrainment, etc. • Modification logistics (mobilization, equipment access, disposal) The Estuary Partnership and the AAs will determine how many, where, and who will participate in all field visits conducted under this contract or relating to the AAs Pile Structure Program. Participants could include AA staff, management and contractors, regional technical experts, scientists, elected officials, members or staff of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (Council), and/or others. The AAs and the Estuary Partnership will meet periodically to collaboratively make decisions and plan field visits.E Field Trips09/15/200811/15/2009ConcludedTracey Yerxa (Inactive)11/12/2009 7:59 AM
B114Identify and Select ProjectsIdentify Priority Pile Structure Modification ProjectsUsing data collected in previous work, the AAs will work with the Estuary Partnership, the Estuary Partnership's Science Workgroup Pile Subcommittee (SWG Pile Subcommittee) and regional experts to identify one or two pilot modification projects. In Year 2007-2008 a list of eight to ten pile structures were identified collaboratively by the AAs, Estuary Partnership, SWG Pile Subcommittee, and regional experts as potential pilot projects for modification. Each pilot project was scored based on the draft project prioritization criteria and is paired with a description describing the hypotheses that can be tested through pile structure removal as well as the potential ecological benefits and challenges associated with removal. Through field visits, landowner outreach, and additional research the AAs, Estuary Partnership, SWG Pile Subcommittee and regional experts will develop a subset of one to two potential pilot projects that will be investigated for near term implementation subsequent to the Coal Creek Slough pilot project. Emphasis will be placed on project feasibility and the following considerations: • Potential ecological benefits • Sites that represent the diversity of testable hypotheses (water quality, predation, sediment processes, etc.) • Historical importance and community support • Low risk of negative impacts resulting from removal (i.e. erosion, contaminant entrainment, etc. • Modification logistics (mobilization, equipment access, disposal) The Estuary Partnership and the AAs will determine how many, where, and who will participate in all field visits conducted under this contract or relating to the AAs Pile Structure Program. Participants could include AA staff, management and contractors, regional technical experts, scientists, elected officials, members or staff of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (Council), and/or others. The AAs and the Estuary Partnership will meet periodically to collaboratively make decisions and plan field visits.FDELIVSelected Projects Description Report 11/15/2009ConcludedTracey Yerxa (Inactive)11/12/2009 7:59 AM
C99Outreach and EducationField Site Visits for Education and Stakeholder SupportThe Estuary Partnership will host several field visits for key partners such as action agencies, elected officials, regulators, resource managers, and scientists. Field visits to proposed pile structure removal projects will strengthen relationships and build Program support. These site visits also inform the resource managers and decision-makers on the Program's importance and provide an opportunity to address emerging issues. Selected field visit locations will demonstrate the array of testable hypotheses. Transportation to field visit locations will be via car, boat, or most appropriate method for site conditions. Most site visits will require a boat accommodating five to seven people. The Estuary Partnership will work collaboratively with the AAs to determine how many, where, and who will participate in all field visits conducted under this contract. Participants could include AA staff, management and contractors, regional technical experts, scientists, elected officials, members or staff of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (Council), and/or others. The AAs and the Estuary Partnership will meet periodically to collaboratively make decisions and plan field visits.A Convene Multiple Site Visits09/15/200811/15/2009ConcludedTracey Yerxa (Inactive)11/12/2009 7:59 AM
C99Outreach and EducationField Site Visits for Education and Stakeholder SupportThe Estuary Partnership will host several field visits for key partners such as action agencies, elected officials, regulators, resource managers, and scientists. Field visits to proposed pile structure removal projects will strengthen relationships and build Program support. These site visits also inform the resource managers and decision-makers on the Program's importance and provide an opportunity to address emerging issues. Selected field visit locations will demonstrate the array of testable hypotheses. Transportation to field visit locations will be via car, boat, or most appropriate method for site conditions. Most site visits will require a boat accommodating five to seven people. The Estuary Partnership will work collaboratively with the AAs to determine how many, where, and who will participate in all field visits conducted under this contract. Participants could include AA staff, management and contractors, regional technical experts, scientists, elected officials, members or staff of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (Council), and/or others. The AAs and the Estuary Partnership will meet periodically to collaboratively make decisions and plan field visits.BDELIVList of Sites Visited and Participants 11/15/2009ConcludedTracey Yerxa (Inactive)11/12/2009 7:59 AM
D165Produce Environmental Compliance DocumentationEnvironmental ComplianceComplete all environmental compliance requirements. Work with BPA COTR and Compliance officer to determine best course of action per subcontract. Align efforts with other participating agencies to avoid duplication of efforts. Update COTR and compliance officer with documentation and status when reported from subcontract sponsors. Portions of this work element will require consultation and are being subcontracted to Subcontractor B. Subcontractor B likely will develop two biological assessments (BAs) addressing ESA and MSA species. Impacts to USFWS species and marine mammals are not anticipated, therefore, compliance with the ESA for USFWS species and marine mammals likely will be addressed through preparation and submittal of a no effect document to BPA. In the event the project may affect these species, an analysis of effects to USFWS species and marine mammals would be included in the BAs discussed above and consultation with USFWS and/or NMFS would be required. In the two BAs and No Effect Letters, Subcontractor B will address all species regulated by the ESA or MSA that potentially will be affected by the proposed projects. With the exception of localized sediment contamination, the subcontractor will gather all information required to author these BAs and No Effect Letters. The subcontractor will attend two meetings with Estuary Partnership staff. During the first meeting, Estuary Partnership staff will introduce the PSP, provide a project description (including locations, construction methods, timing, etc.), and answer any questions the subcontractor may have. Construction methods and BMPs will be based on those specified in permitting documents for the Coal Creek Slough Restoration Project, as well as those specified in the NOAA Restoration Center Northwest’s Programmatic Biological Opinion. During the second meeting, the subcontractor will discuss Estuary Partnership review comments as well as those received from USFWS and NMFS. Subcontractor B also will attend one site visit for each site. The Estuary Partnership will provide transportation to and from the project sites and will attend site visits to discuss project specifics with the subontractor.A Complete environmental compliance documentation09/15/200811/15/2009ConcludedTracey Yerxa (Inactive)11/12/2009 7:59 AM
D165Produce Environmental Compliance DocumentationEnvironmental ComplianceComplete all environmental compliance requirements. Work with BPA COTR and Compliance officer to determine best course of action per subcontract. Align efforts with other participating agencies to avoid duplication of efforts. Update COTR and compliance officer with documentation and status when reported from subcontract sponsors. Portions of this work element will require consultation and are being subcontracted to Subcontractor B. Subcontractor B likely will develop two biological assessments (BAs) addressing ESA and MSA species. Impacts to USFWS species and marine mammals are not anticipated, therefore, compliance with the ESA for USFWS species and marine mammals likely will be addressed through preparation and submittal of a no effect document to BPA. In the event the project may affect these species, an analysis of effects to USFWS species and marine mammals would be included in the BAs discussed above and consultation with USFWS and/or NMFS would be required. In the two BAs and No Effect Letters, Subcontractor B will address all species regulated by the ESA or MSA that potentially will be affected by the proposed projects. With the exception of localized sediment contamination, the subcontractor will gather all information required to author these BAs and No Effect Letters. The subcontractor will attend two meetings with Estuary Partnership staff. During the first meeting, Estuary Partnership staff will introduce the PSP, provide a project description (including locations, construction methods, timing, etc.), and answer any questions the subcontractor may have. Construction methods and BMPs will be based on those specified in permitting documents for the Coal Creek Slough Restoration Project, as well as those specified in the NOAA Restoration Center Northwest’s Programmatic Biological Opinion. During the second meeting, the subcontractor will discuss Estuary Partnership review comments as well as those received from USFWS and NMFS. Subcontractor B also will attend one site visit for each site. The Estuary Partnership will provide transportation to and from the project sites and will attend site visits to discuss project specifics with the subontractor.B Pre Monitoring01/15/200911/15/2009ConcludedTracey Yerxa (Inactive)11/12/2009 7:59 AM
D165Produce Environmental Compliance DocumentationEnvironmental ComplianceComplete all environmental compliance requirements. Work with BPA COTR and Compliance officer to determine best course of action per subcontract. Align efforts with other participating agencies to avoid duplication of efforts. Update COTR and compliance officer with documentation and status when reported from subcontract sponsors. Portions of this work element will require consultation and are being subcontracted to Subcontractor B. Subcontractor B likely will develop two biological assessments (BAs) addressing ESA and MSA species. Impacts to USFWS species and marine mammals are not anticipated, therefore, compliance with the ESA for USFWS species and marine mammals likely will be addressed through preparation and submittal of a no effect document to BPA. In the event the project may affect these species, an analysis of effects to USFWS species and marine mammals would be included in the BAs discussed above and consultation with USFWS and/or NMFS would be required. In the two BAs and No Effect Letters, Subcontractor B will address all species regulated by the ESA or MSA that potentially will be affected by the proposed projects. With the exception of localized sediment contamination, the subcontractor will gather all information required to author these BAs and No Effect Letters. The subcontractor will attend two meetings with Estuary Partnership staff. During the first meeting, Estuary Partnership staff will introduce the PSP, provide a project description (including locations, construction methods, timing, etc.), and answer any questions the subcontractor may have. Construction methods and BMPs will be based on those specified in permitting documents for the Coal Creek Slough Restoration Project, as well as those specified in the NOAA Restoration Center Northwest’s Programmatic Biological Opinion. During the second meeting, the subcontractor will discuss Estuary Partnership review comments as well as those received from USFWS and NMFS. Subcontractor B also will attend one site visit for each site. The Estuary Partnership will provide transportation to and from the project sites and will attend site visits to discuss project specifics with the subontractor.C Pre-Implementation01/15/200911/15/2009ConcludedTracey Yerxa (Inactive)11/12/2009 7:59 AM
D165Produce Environmental Compliance DocumentationEnvironmental ComplianceComplete all environmental compliance requirements. Work with BPA COTR and Compliance officer to determine best course of action per subcontract. Align efforts with other participating agencies to avoid duplication of efforts. Update COTR and compliance officer with documentation and status when reported from subcontract sponsors. Portions of this work element will require consultation and are being subcontracted to Subcontractor B. Subcontractor B likely will develop two biological assessments (BAs) addressing ESA and MSA species. Impacts to USFWS species and marine mammals are not anticipated, therefore, compliance with the ESA for USFWS species and marine mammals likely will be addressed through preparation and submittal of a no effect document to BPA. In the event the project may affect these species, an analysis of effects to USFWS species and marine mammals would be included in the BAs discussed above and consultation with USFWS and/or NMFS would be required. In the two BAs and No Effect Letters, Subcontractor B will address all species regulated by the ESA or MSA that potentially will be affected by the proposed projects. With the exception of localized sediment contamination, the subcontractor will gather all information required to author these BAs and No Effect Letters. The subcontractor will attend two meetings with Estuary Partnership staff. During the first meeting, Estuary Partnership staff will introduce the PSP, provide a project description (including locations, construction methods, timing, etc.), and answer any questions the subcontractor may have. Construction methods and BMPs will be based on those specified in permitting documents for the Coal Creek Slough Restoration Project, as well as those specified in the NOAA Restoration Center Northwest’s Programmatic Biological Opinion. During the second meeting, the subcontractor will discuss Estuary Partnership review comments as well as those received from USFWS and NMFS. Subcontractor B also will attend one site visit for each site. The Estuary Partnership will provide transportation to and from the project sites and will attend site visits to discuss project specifics with the subontractor.D Complete Biological Assessments07/06/200911/15/2009ConcludedTracey Yerxa (Inactive)11/12/2009 7:59 AM