View and print project details including project summary, purpose, associations to Biological Opinions, and area. To learn more about any of the project properties, hold your mouse cursor over the field label.
Province | Subbasin | % |
---|---|---|
Intermountain | Pend Oreille | 100.00% |
Description: Page: 3 Figure 1: Nimz and TNC Ranch locations. Project(s): 1992-061-05 Document: P121943 Dimensions: 338 x 411 Description: Page: 4 Figure 2: 1934 waterways on Nimz Ranch. Project(s): 1992-061-05 Document: P121943 Dimensions: 344 x 494 Description: Page: 9 Figure 3: Planting willow stakes with Waterjet. Project(s): 1992-061-05 Document: P121943 Dimensions: 383 x 287 Description: Page: 12 Figure 4: Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation project. Courtesy of Kootenai Tribe. Project(s): 1992-061-05 Document: P121943 Dimensions: 383 x 287 |
To view all expenditures for all fiscal years, click "Project Exp. by FY"
To see more detailed project budget information, please visit the "Project Budget" page
Acct FY | Acct Type | Amount | Fund | Budget Decision | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2024 | Expense | $420,081 | From: Fish Accord - Kootenai | Kootenai Tribe of Idaho (KToI) 2023-2025 MOA Extension | 09/30/2022 |
FY2025 | Expense | $430,583 | From: Fish Accord - Kootenai | Kootenai Tribe of Idaho (KToI) 2023-2025 MOA Extension | 09/30/2022 |
FY2025 | Expense | $51,865 | From: Fish Accord - Kootenai | Accord Transfers (Kootenai) 12/4/2024 | 12/13/2024 |
FY2025 | Expense | $51,865 | To: Fish Accord - Kootenai | Accord Transfers (Kootenai) 12/4/2024 | 12/13/2024 |
FY2025 | Expense | $197 | From: Fish Accord - Kootenai | Accord Transfers (Kootenai) 12/4/2024 | 12/13/2024 |
FY2025 | Expense | $197 | To: Fish Accord - Kootenai | Accord Transfers (Kootenai) 12/4/2024 | 12/13/2024 |
FY2025 | Expense | $128,123 | From: Fish Accord - Kootenai | Accord Transfers (Kootenai) 12/4/2024 | 12/13/2024 |
FY2025 | Expense | $128,123 | To: Fish Accord - Kootenai | Accord Transfers (Kootenai) 12/4/2024 | 12/13/2024 |
Number | Contractor Name | Title | Status | Total Contracted Amount | Dates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
37878 SOW | Kootenai Tribe | 1992-061-05 EXP KOOTENAI TRIBE ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION | Closed | $195,911 | 6/1/2008 - 5/31/2009 |
42696 SOW | Kootenai Tribe | 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WL KOOTENAI TRIBE | Closed | $206,113 | 6/1/2009 - 5/31/2010 |
49074 SOW | Kootenai Tribe | 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WL KOOTENAI | Closed | $212,258 | 6/1/2010 - 5/31/2011 |
54312 SOW | Kootenai Tribe | 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WL KOOTENAI | Closed | $343,991 | 6/1/2011 - 5/31/2012 |
58323 SOW | Kootenai Tribe | 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WL KOOTENAI | Closed | $314,311 | 6/1/2012 - 5/31/2013 |
61356 SOW | Kootenai Tribe | 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WL KOOTENAI | Closed | $343,097 | 6/1/2013 - 5/31/2014 |
65417 SOW | Kootenai Tribe | 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WL KOOTENAI | Closed | $381,720 | 6/1/2014 - 5/31/2015 |
68741 SOW | Kootenai Tribe | 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WL KOOTENAI | Closed | $311,813 | 6/1/2015 - 5/31/2016 |
72748 SOW | Kootenai Tribe | 1992-061-05 EXP KOOTENAI ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION | Closed | $376,555 | 6/1/2016 - 5/31/2017 |
76412 SOW | Kootenai Tribe | 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION - KOOTENAI | Closed | $397,151 | 6/1/2017 - 5/31/2018 |
76826 REL 6 SOW | Kootenai Tribe | 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION - KOOTENAI | Closed | $399,757 | 6/1/2018 - 5/31/2019 |
76826 REL 13 SOW | Kootenai Tribe | 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION - KOOTENAI | Closed | $399,581 | 6/1/2019 - 5/31/2020 |
76826 REL 18 SOW | Kootenai Tribe | 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION - KOOTENAI | Closed | $347,913 | 6/1/2020 - 5/31/2021 |
76826 REL 26 SOW | Kootenai Tribe | 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION - KOOTENAI | Closed | $276,652 | 6/1/2021 - 5/31/2022 |
76826 REL 31 SOW | Kootenai Tribe | 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION - KOOTENAI | Closed | $301,047 | 6/1/2022 - 5/31/2023 |
84055 REL 6 SOW | Kootenai Tribe | 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION - KOOTENAI | Issued | $399,778 | 6/1/2023 - 5/31/2024 |
84055 REL 13 SOW | Kootenai Tribe | 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION - KOOTENAI | Issued | $850,664 | 6/1/2024 - 5/31/2026 |
Annual Progress Reports | |
---|---|
Expected (since FY2004): | 16 |
Completed: | 15 |
On time: | 15 |
Status Reports | |
---|---|
Completed: | 65 |
On time: | 19 |
Avg Days Late: | 14 |
Assessment Number: | 1992-061-05-NPCC-20210312 |
---|---|
Project: | 1992-061-05 - Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation-Kootenai Tribe |
Review: | 2017 Wildlife Category Review |
Approved Date: | 10/13/2017 |
Recommendation: | Implement |
Comments: |
Recommendation: Sponsor to address ISRP qualification by developing an adaptive management framework and submit to ISRP for review by the end of 2018 (per programmatic issue recommendations in this Decision Document Part 1). [Background: See https://www.nwcouncil.org/fish-and-wildlife/project-reviews-and-recommendations/2017-wildlife-project-review] |
Assessment Number: | 1992-061-05-ISRP-20201118 |
---|---|
Project: | 1992-061-05 - Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation-Kootenai Tribe |
Review: | 2017 Wildlife Category Review |
Completed Date: | 11/18/2020 |
Final Round ISRP Date: | 6/28/2017 |
Final Round ISRP Rating: | Meets Scientific Review Criteria (Qualified) |
Final Round ISRP Comment: | |
The proponents provided a detailed, positive response to the ISRP concerns. While specific uncertainties remain – such as how the UWMEP monitoring data will be used – the overall response communicates a strong understanding of what the Tribe hopes to achieve with their collection of mitigation and restoration projects. This is a well-managed and productive program. Some of the ISRP concerns arise from the number of (separate) KTOI projects and their need for seamless integration. This might be a topic to discuss with them to explore ways to make the overall effort more understandable by reviewers. |
|
Qualification #1 - Inclusion in Next Management Plan
The proponents indicate that they will establish quantifiable biological objectives and an adaptive management framework with the UWMEP project over the next year. The qualification is that the proponents provide this information for ISRP review within one year. This document can be a single product from the three tribes (Kalispel, Kootenai, Coeur d’Alene) implementing Albeni Falls projects.
|
|
Documentation Links: |
|
Assessment Number: | 1992-061-05-NPCC-20091217 |
---|---|
Project: | 1992-061-05 - Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation-Kootenai Tribe |
Review: | Wildlife Category Review |
Approved Date: | 5/31/2009 |
Recommendation: | Fund |
Comments: | Programmatic issues #2-3, and #10. See project-specific comments for Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation |
Conditions: | |
Council Condition #1 Programmatic Issue: Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP) - interaction between wildlife crediting and monitoring | |
Council Condition #2 Programmatic Issue: Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP) participation funding | |
Council Condition #3 Programmatic Issue: Regional Coordination funding |
Assessment Number: | 1992-061-05-ISRP-20090618 |
---|---|
Project: | 1992-061-05 - Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation-Kootenai Tribe |
Review: | Wildlife Category Review |
Completed Date: | 5/19/2009 |
Final Round ISRP Date: | None |
Final Round ISRP Rating: | Meets Scientific Review Criteria |
Final Round ISRP Comment: | |
This is a well designed and implemented project. Taking the time upfront for the types of planning and prioritizing demonstrated will ultimately make the project much more effective. Choosing to involve the public and to cultivate partnerships is also a wise investment in project success. This project demonstrates not only sound science, but sound planning practice as well.
1. Technical justification, program significance and consistency, and project relationships: These sections are well organized and make a compelling case. The project is related to subbasin plans and other relevant plans and programs. 2. Project History and Results This is a very useful history with sufficient results in terms of data and interpretation to illustrate scientific credibility of the project. This could be used as an example in the Albeni Falls group for results reporting. 3. Objectives, work elements, and methods These are well described, and the choice of methods is based upon work that is often site-specific. Adaptive management is already evident. We suggest looking at more recent references for noxious plant management – there has been great progress since 1988. For example biological control, targeted grazing and new understanding of plant life histories should be considered. The problems with funding options to purchase and reaching traditional agricultural land owners with education on easements might be assisted by the American Farmland Trust, if you have not investigated this possibility already. Also UI Forestry Extension does easement workshops for landowners and might be a good partner in this effort. 4. M&E The sponsors monitor burned area vegetation response and evaluate water level response of vegetation. The same new approach as other Albeni Falls tribal projects, working with UWMEP, is proposed. However, they have some specific objectives for Trout Creek parcel including 4 sampling locations and present some data including avian point count data 2005-2008, invertebrate data 2005-2008, fine scale habitat data (p.34). The sponsor's strong commitment to M&E is obvious from the beginning of the project, in spite of logistic changes along the way. Results reporting in project history and appropriate discussion of monitoring in other sections demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the value of monitoring in long-term projects. These data will contribute to increasing project effectiveness and efficiency over time. |
|
First Round ISRP Date: | 3/26/2009 |
First Round ISRP Rating: | Meets Scientific Review Criteria |
First Round ISRP Comment: | |
This is a well designed and implemented project. Taking the time upfront for the types of planning and prioritizing demonstrated will ultimately make the project much more effective. Choosing to involve the public and to cultivate partnerships is also a wise investment in project success. This project demonstrates not only sound science, but sound planning practice as well. 1. Technical justification, program significance and consistency, and project relationships: These sections are well organized and make a compelling case. The project is related to subbasin plans and other relevant plans and programs. 2. Project History and Results This is a very useful history with sufficient results in terms of data and interpretation to illustrate scientific credibility of the project. This could be used as an example in the Albeni Falls group for results reporting. 3. Objectives, work elements, and methods These are well described, and the choice of methods is based upon work that is often site-specific. Adaptive management is already evident. We suggest looking at more recent references for noxious plant management – there has been great progress since 1988. For example biological control, targeted grazing and new understanding of plant life histories should be considered. The problems with funding options to purchase and reaching traditional agricultural land owners with education on easements might be assisted by the American Farmland Trust, if you have not investigated this possibility already. Also UI Forestry Extension does easement workshops for landowners and might be a good partner in this effort. 4. M&E The sponsors monitor burned area vegetation response and evaluate water level response of vegetation. The same new approach as other Albeni Falls tribal projects, working with UWMEP, is proposed. However, they have some specific objectives for Trout Creek parcel including 4 sampling locations and present some data including avian point count data 2005-2008, invertebrate data 2005-2008, fine scale habitat data (p.34). The sponsor's strong commitment to M&E is obvious from the beginning of the project, in spite of logistic changes along the way. Results reporting in project history and appropriate discussion of monitoring in other sections demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the value of monitoring in long-term projects. These data will contribute to increasing project effectiveness and efficiency over time. |
|
Documentation Links: |
Assessment Number: | 1992-061-05-CAPITAL-20090618 |
---|---|
Project Number: | 1992-061-05 |
Review: | FY07-09 Solicitation Review |
Completed Date: | 2/27/2007 |
Capital Rating: | Does Not Qualify for Capital Funding |
Capital Asset Category: | None |
Comment: | None |
Name | Role | Organization |
---|---|---|
Virgil Watts III | Project Manager | Bonneville Power Administration |
Jenna Peterson | Interested Party | Bonneville Power Administration |
Edward Gresh | Env. Compliance Lead | Bonneville Power Administration |
Shelby Therrian | Project Lead | Kootenai Tribe |
Ashley Gray | Administrative Contact | Kootenai Tribe |
Gary Aitken, Jr | Supervisor | Kootenai Tribe |