Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program
RSS Feed for updates to Project 1992-061-05 - Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation-Kootenai Tribe Follow this via RSS feed. Help setting up RSS feeds?

Project Summary

Project 1992-061-05 - Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation-Kootenai Tribe
Project Number:
1992-061-05
Title:
Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation-Kootenai Tribe
Summary:
Natural resources, including flora and fauna have shaped the culture of the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho (Tribe) for thousands of years. The aboriginal territories of the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho people were far reaching with traditional hunting, fishing, and gathering activities extending into British Columbia, Western Montana, and all of Northern Idaho; many of the areas and resources traditionally used by the Tribe have been lost, anadromous salmonids no longer journey up the Upper Columbia River and its tributaries and wapato no longer blooms on the drained wet meadows. Even today, the Kootenai white sturgeon and burbot struggle to maintain historic spawning grounds. It is the goal of the Tribe to promote full mitigation of the impacts suffered by the people of the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho and the fish, water, wildlife, and plant resources which they depended, as a direct and indirect result of the development and operation of the Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS).

Coordination and cooperation between all agencies and Upper Columbia United Tribes (UCUT), including the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho, will ensure Albeni Falls wildlife mitigation activities are consistent with the Northwest Power Conservation Council's (NWPCC) Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program and the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority (CBFWA). The purpose of this work statement is to provide funds to the Tribe to participate in the Albeni Falls Interagency Work Group (Work Group) and implementation of Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation Project - 9206100 (Project). The Kootenai Tribe of Idaho project work statement and process follows the newly adopted program (NWPPC 2000) and the 1995 Fish and Wildlife Program by focusing its efforts on the mitigation of fish and wildlife losses attributable to the development, operation and management of the Columbia River Basin hydroelectric facilities. This project will also complement, support, and integrate ongoing and future fisheries, wildlife and ecological studies in the Kootenai River Basin.

The Kootenai Tribe of Idaho has met with community groups, agencies, governments and local individuals, including but not limited to local farmers, sportsman groups and county officials, in order to address public concerns regarding wetland/riparian mitigation and conservation activities. This community-oriented approach (membership in Kootenai Valley Resource initiative [KVRI], and development of the “Kootenai River Valley Wetland and Riparian Conservation Strategy”) has protracted the short-term mitigation activities of the Tribal mitigation program, but at this measured pace the Tribal mitigation program hopes to accomplish a more stable, long-lived wildlife mitigation strategy and insure the success of local wildlife management activities in the future. The Kootenai Tribe of Idaho is reviewing mitigation opportunities that combine local values, issues, and address potential concerns regarding land purchases in the Kootenai aboriginal territories.

Natural tree regeneration (cottonwood) on depositional areas along the Kootenai River shows promise during early surveys, but high winter flows by Libby Dam flooded, scoured and drown a large percentage of all surveyed natural regeneration. Surveys of water timing/duration/depth, and other factors influencing natural recruitment have been documented and the Tribe will utilize observational data and related river data (#20020800) to show the related impacts of winter high flows due to power peaking operation from Libby Dam (associated work in #2002-011-00) and develop manage options to assist in the increase of river bank pioneering species.

Long term funding of mitigation project operations and maintenance actions are based on ecological principles and activities that protect and/or maintain functional target habitats and associated habitat units (HU's) while ensuring project viability and integrity. O&M also includes administrative functions and practices that support protection and operations and maintenance measures on project lands.

Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is an integral component of long-term O&M. Monitoring target habitats (via HEP/vegetation surveys) and associated fish and wildlife species (via surveys on loss assessment species or surrogates) is necessary to ensure that post enhancement habitat activities fulfill the long-term maintenance of habitats and species being mitigated.
Proposer:
None
Proponent Orgs:
Kootenai Tribe (Tribe)
Starting FY:
2004
Ending FY:
2052
Stage:
Implementation - Project Status Report
Area:
Province Subbasin %
Intermountain Pend Oreille 100.00%
Purpose:
Habitat
Emphasis:
Restoration/Protection
Focal Species:
Burbot
Other Resident
Sturgeon, White - Kootenai River DPS
Trout, Rainbow
Wildlife
Species Benefit:
Anadromous: 0.0%   Resident: 0.0%   Wildlife: 100.0%
Special:
None
BiOp Association:
None

Description: Page: 3 Figure 1: Nimz and TNC Ranch locations.

Project(s): 1992-061-05

Document: P121943

Dimensions: 338 x 411

Description: Page: 4 Figure 2: 1934 waterways on Nimz Ranch.

Project(s): 1992-061-05

Document: P121943

Dimensions: 344 x 494

Description: Page: 9 Figure 3: Planting willow stakes with Waterjet.

Project(s): 1992-061-05

Document: P121943

Dimensions: 383 x 287

Description: Page: 12 Figure 4: Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation project. Courtesy of Kootenai Tribe.

Project(s): 1992-061-05

Document: P121943

Dimensions: 383 x 287


Summary of Budgets

To view all expenditures for all fiscal years, click "Project Exp. by FY"

To see more detailed project budget information, please visit the "Project Budget" page

Decided Budget Transfers  (FY2024 - FY2026)

Acct FY Acct Type Amount Fund Budget Decision Date
FY2024 Expense $420,081 From: Fish Accord - Kootenai Kootenai Tribe of Idaho (KToI) 2023-2025 MOA Extension 09/30/2022
FY2025 Expense $430,583 From: Fish Accord - Kootenai Kootenai Tribe of Idaho (KToI) 2023-2025 MOA Extension 09/30/2022

Pending Budget Decision?  No


Actual Project Cost Share

Current Fiscal Year — 2025
Cost Share Partner Total Proposed Contribution Total Confirmed Contribution
There are no project cost share contributions to show.
Previous Fiscal Years
Fiscal Year Total Contributions % of Budget
2020 (Draft)
2019 $7,374 2%
2018 $5,000 1%
2017 $5,000 1%
2016 $5,000 1%
2015 $7,830 2%
2014 $5,000 1%
2013 $17,830 5%
2012 $5,000 2%
2011
2010
2009
2008

Contracts

The table below contains contracts with the following statuses: Active, Closed, Complete, History, Issued.
* "Total Contracted Amount" column includes contracted amount from both capital and expense components of the contract.
Expense Contracts:
Number Contractor Name Title Status Total Contracted Amount Dates
37878 SOW Kootenai Tribe 1992-061-05 EXP KOOTENAI TRIBE ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION Closed $195,911 6/1/2008 - 5/31/2009
42696 SOW Kootenai Tribe 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WL KOOTENAI TRIBE Closed $206,113 6/1/2009 - 5/31/2010
49074 SOW Kootenai Tribe 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WL KOOTENAI Closed $212,258 6/1/2010 - 5/31/2011
54312 SOW Kootenai Tribe 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WL KOOTENAI Closed $343,991 6/1/2011 - 5/31/2012
58323 SOW Kootenai Tribe 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WL KOOTENAI Closed $314,311 6/1/2012 - 5/31/2013
61356 SOW Kootenai Tribe 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WL KOOTENAI Closed $343,097 6/1/2013 - 5/31/2014
65417 SOW Kootenai Tribe 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WL KOOTENAI Closed $381,720 6/1/2014 - 5/31/2015
68741 SOW Kootenai Tribe 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WL KOOTENAI Closed $311,813 6/1/2015 - 5/31/2016
72748 SOW Kootenai Tribe 1992-061-05 EXP KOOTENAI ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION Closed $376,555 6/1/2016 - 5/31/2017
76412 SOW Kootenai Tribe 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION - KOOTENAI Closed $397,151 6/1/2017 - 5/31/2018
76826 REL 6 SOW Kootenai Tribe 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION - KOOTENAI Closed $399,757 6/1/2018 - 5/31/2019
76826 REL 13 SOW Kootenai Tribe 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION - KOOTENAI Closed $399,581 6/1/2019 - 5/31/2020
76826 REL 18 SOW Kootenai Tribe 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION - KOOTENAI Closed $347,913 6/1/2020 - 5/31/2021
76826 REL 26 SOW Kootenai Tribe 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION - KOOTENAI Closed $276,652 6/1/2021 - 5/31/2022
76826 REL 31 SOW Kootenai Tribe 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION - KOOTENAI Closed $301,047 6/1/2022 - 5/31/2023
84055 REL 6 SOW Kootenai Tribe 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION - KOOTENAI Issued $399,778 6/1/2023 - 5/31/2024
84055 REL 13 SOW Kootenai Tribe 1992-061-05 EXP ALBENI FALLS WILDLIFE MITIGATION - KOOTENAI Issued $850,664 6/1/2024 - 5/31/2026



Annual Progress Reports
Expected (since FY2004):16
Completed:15
On time:15
Status Reports
Completed:65
On time:19
Avg Days Late:14



The table content is updated frequently and thus contains more recent information than what was in the original proposal reviewed by ISRP and Council.

Review: 2017 Wildlife Category Review

Council Recommendation

Assessment Number: 1992-061-05-NPCC-20210312
Project: 1992-061-05 - Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation-Kootenai Tribe
Review: 2017 Wildlife Category Review
Approved Date: 10/13/2017
Recommendation: Implement
Comments: Recommendation: Sponsor to address ISRP qualification by developing an adaptive management framework and submit to ISRP for review by the end of 2018 (per programmatic issue recommendations in this Decision Document Part 1).

[Background: See https://www.nwcouncil.org/fish-and-wildlife/project-reviews-and-recommendations/2017-wildlife-project-review]

Independent Scientific Review Panel Assessment

Assessment Number: 1992-061-05-ISRP-20201118
Project: 1992-061-05 - Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation-Kootenai Tribe
Review: 2017 Wildlife Category Review
Completed Date: 11/18/2020
Final Round ISRP Date: 6/28/2017
Final Round ISRP Rating: Meets Scientific Review Criteria (Qualified)
Final Round ISRP Comment:

The proponents provided a detailed, positive response to the ISRP concerns. While specific uncertainties remain – such as how the UWMEP monitoring data will be used – the overall response communicates a strong understanding of what the Tribe hopes to achieve with their collection of mitigation and restoration projects. This is a well-managed and productive program. Some of the ISRP concerns arise from the number of (separate) KTOI projects and their need for seamless integration. This might be a topic to discuss with them to explore ways to make the overall effort more understandable by reviewers.

Qualification #1 - Inclusion in Next Management Plan
The proponents indicate that they will establish quantifiable biological objectives and an adaptive management framework with the UWMEP project over the next year. The qualification is that the proponents provide this information for ISRP review within one year. This document can be a single product from the three tribes (Kalispel, Kootenai, Coeur d’Alene) implementing Albeni Falls projects.
Documentation Links:
Review: Wildlife Category Review

Council Recommendation

Assessment Number: 1992-061-05-NPCC-20091217
Project: 1992-061-05 - Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation-Kootenai Tribe
Review: Wildlife Category Review
Approved Date: 5/31/2009
Recommendation: Fund
Comments: Programmatic issues #2-3, and #10. See project-specific comments for Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation
Conditions:
Council Condition #1 Programmatic Issue: Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP) - interaction between wildlife crediting and monitoring
Council Condition #2 Programmatic Issue: Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP) participation funding
Council Condition #3 Programmatic Issue: Regional Coordination funding

Independent Scientific Review Panel Assessment

Assessment Number: 1992-061-05-ISRP-20090618
Project: 1992-061-05 - Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation-Kootenai Tribe
Review: Wildlife Category Review
Completed Date: 5/19/2009
Final Round ISRP Date: None
Final Round ISRP Rating: Meets Scientific Review Criteria
Final Round ISRP Comment:
This is a well designed and implemented project. Taking the time upfront for the types of planning and prioritizing demonstrated will ultimately make the project much more effective. Choosing to involve the public and to cultivate partnerships is also a wise investment in project success. This project demonstrates not only sound science, but sound planning practice as well.

1. Technical justification, program significance and consistency, and project relationships:
These sections are well organized and make a compelling case. The project is related to subbasin plans and other relevant plans and programs.

2. Project History and Results
This is a very useful history with sufficient results in terms of data and interpretation to illustrate scientific credibility of the project. This could be used as an example in the Albeni Falls group for results reporting.

3. Objectives, work elements, and methods
These are well described, and the choice of methods is based upon work that is often site-specific. Adaptive management is already evident.

We suggest looking at more recent references for noxious plant management – there has been great progress since 1988. For example biological control, targeted grazing and new understanding of plant life histories should be considered.

The problems with funding options to purchase and reaching traditional agricultural land owners with education on easements might be assisted by the American Farmland Trust, if you have not investigated this possibility already. Also UI Forestry Extension does easement workshops for landowners and might be a good partner in this effort.

4. M&E
The sponsors monitor burned area vegetation response and evaluate water level response of vegetation. The same new approach as other Albeni Falls tribal projects, working with UWMEP, is proposed. However, they have some specific objectives for Trout Creek parcel including 4 sampling locations and present some data including avian point count data 2005-2008, invertebrate data 2005-2008, fine scale habitat data (p.34).

The sponsor's strong commitment to M&E is obvious from the beginning of the project, in spite of logistic changes along the way. Results reporting in project history and appropriate discussion of monitoring in other sections demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the value of monitoring in long-term projects. These data will contribute to increasing project effectiveness and efficiency over time.
First Round ISRP Date: 3/26/2009
First Round ISRP Rating: Meets Scientific Review Criteria
First Round ISRP Comment:

This is a well designed and implemented project. Taking the time upfront for the types of planning and prioritizing demonstrated will ultimately make the project much more effective. Choosing to involve the public and to cultivate partnerships is also a wise investment in project success. This project demonstrates not only sound science, but sound planning practice as well. 1. Technical justification, program significance and consistency, and project relationships: These sections are well organized and make a compelling case. The project is related to subbasin plans and other relevant plans and programs. 2. Project History and Results This is a very useful history with sufficient results in terms of data and interpretation to illustrate scientific credibility of the project. This could be used as an example in the Albeni Falls group for results reporting. 3. Objectives, work elements, and methods These are well described, and the choice of methods is based upon work that is often site-specific. Adaptive management is already evident. We suggest looking at more recent references for noxious plant management – there has been great progress since 1988. For example biological control, targeted grazing and new understanding of plant life histories should be considered. The problems with funding options to purchase and reaching traditional agricultural land owners with education on easements might be assisted by the American Farmland Trust, if you have not investigated this possibility already. Also UI Forestry Extension does easement workshops for landowners and might be a good partner in this effort. 4. M&E The sponsors monitor burned area vegetation response and evaluate water level response of vegetation. The same new approach as other Albeni Falls tribal projects, working with UWMEP, is proposed. However, they have some specific objectives for Trout Creek parcel including 4 sampling locations and present some data including avian point count data 2005-2008, invertebrate data 2005-2008, fine scale habitat data (p.34). The sponsor's strong commitment to M&E is obvious from the beginning of the project, in spite of logistic changes along the way. Results reporting in project history and appropriate discussion of monitoring in other sections demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the value of monitoring in long-term projects. These data will contribute to increasing project effectiveness and efficiency over time.

Documentation Links:
Review: FY07-09 Solicitation Review

Capital Assessment

Assessment Number: 1992-061-05-CAPITAL-20090618
Project Number: 1992-061-05
Review: FY07-09 Solicitation Review
Completed Date: 2/27/2007
Capital Rating: Does Not Qualify for Capital Funding
Capital Asset Category: None
Comment: None

Project Relationships: None

Name Role Organization
Virgil Watts III Project Manager Bonneville Power Administration
Jenna Peterson Interested Party Bonneville Power Administration
Edward Gresh Env. Compliance Lead Bonneville Power Administration
Shelby Therrian Project Lead Kootenai Tribe
Ashley Gray Administrative Contact Kootenai Tribe
Gary Aitken, Jr Supervisor Kootenai Tribe