None

• Because designing large scale (greater than $250,000 value) facilities involves significant technical detail and engineering specifications, use 175. Produce Design.
• Because the project is part of the Council's 3-Step Process, use 196. Council Step Process for the process leading up to implementation.
• 165. Produce Environmental Compliance Documentation must be used to describe required monitoring or follow-up reporting related to environmental compliance provisions.
• If you are constructing, modifying, or upgrading an artificial production facility, use 171. Build, Modify, and/or Refurbish Artificial Production Facility.
  

• Rule 1 (Environmental Compliance): NEPA, ESA, other environmental compliance work should be split out as a separate work element under 165. Produce Environmental Compliance Documentation.
  
  
  Example:
  

  
  WE: 100. Construction Management
  WE Title: Manage construction of Healthy Fish Hatchery.
  
  WE: 165. Produce Environmental Compliance Documentation
  WE Title: NEPA, Cultural Resources, and ESA Compliance.
  WE Description: Provide maps, designs, and information to BPA and work closely with them on BA for NOAA Fisheries and USFWS.
  
  
• Rule 2 (Complexity): Because the project is complex and/or large-scale (e.g., major or capital construction), feasibility, design, construction management, and construction will be separate work elements, and on very large projects, perhaps even separate contracts. If the project is routine or small-scale, construction management could appear as a milestone under the work element that accomplishes the work.
  
  
  Example: You manage the Cascadia Hatchery project, a proposed hatchery complex intended to increase production of Chinook and steelhead in the Cascadia subbasin. In order to build the hatchery facilities, you must complete several related work elements. This example shows how the above rules might be applied and how related work might be called out using a typical plan-design-build cycle for such a major construction project:
  
  

  • 199. Remove Vegetation

  • 165. Produce Environmental Compliance Documentation

  • 175. Produce Design

  • 171. Build, Modify, and/or Refurbish Artificial Production Facility - Cascadia Fish Hatchery

  • 100. Construction Management covers activities in a separate construction management contract.

  
  
  
  NOTE: Any coordination work (i.e., work to get agreement from regulators and among fish managers) should be captured as a milestone under the work element the coordination most directly supports. For example, if the coordination is necessary to enable the on-the-ground work of building the hatchery, coordination work should be captured as a milestone under 171. Build, Modify, and/or Refurbish Artificial Production Facility. If the project is in the planning stages, and the hatchery won't be built until later, in a subsequent contract, coordination could be captured under 175. Produce Design, or under 196. Council Step Process.
  
  

None

None

None

Reports that Use this Work Element

This work element and its metrics are used in measures in the following reports. These PDF reports are generated dynamically, always showing you the most up to date information. Most of them also have links to download the underlying data sets to structured text or Excel format.

Work Element Usage

Types of Work Funded

View as PDF

Project Number:
Account:	Expense and Capital Expense Capital
Province/Subbasin:	Specified By Project Proposal
Province:	All Blue Mountain Columbia Cascade Columbia Gorge Columbia Plateau Columbia River Estuary Intermountain Lower Columbia Middle Snake Mountain Columbia Mountain Snake Upper Snake
Subbasin:	All Asotin Grande Ronde Imnaha Snake Hells Canyon Columbia Upper Middle Entiat Lake Chelan Methow Okanogan Wenatchee Big White Salmon Columbia Gorge Fifteenmile Hood Klickitat Little White Salmon Wind Columbia Lower Middle Crab Deschutes John Day Palouse Snake Lower Tucannon Umatilla Walla Walla Yakima Columbia Estuary Cowlitz Elochoman Grays Coeur D'Alene Columbia Upper Pend Oreille Sanpoil Spokane Columbia Lower Kalama Lewis Sandy Washougal Willamette Boise Bruneau Burnt Malheur Owyhee Payette Powder Snake Lower Middle Snake Upper Middle Weiser Bitterroot Blackfoot Clark Fork Flathead Kootenai Clearwater Salmon Snake Headwaters Snake Upper Snake Upper Closed Basin
Work Start Date:
Work End or Concluded Date:

Overview: Rolls up program funding across time by work class such as Habitat, Hatchery, Research Monitoring and Evaluation, Local & Regional Coordination, etc. Includes summary and detail pie charts showing funding levels for various types of work. Provides drill-downs to work element detail.

Dimensions: Work Class, Work Element, Work Element Budget, Account Type (Expense or Capital), NPCC Province, NPCC Subbasin

Stats and Overview

Number of active contracts using Work Element #100 by FY

Top 5 BPA Project Managers using this Work Element:
(by number of current contracts)
	Andre L'Heureux (Inactive)	45
	Tracy Hauser	35
	Jennifer Lord	28
	Mary Haight	22
	Joseph Connor (Inactive)	19
Average Work Element Budget:		$94,262
Average Duration:		11 months