This page provides details of the selected work element.
SOWRevision | Planned | Updated | Contractor Comments (optional) | BPA Comments (optional) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. 25499 (11/04/2005 - 12/31/2006) | $6,605 | $6,605 | Budget is the same. | |
2. Amendment 001 (11/04/2005 - 10/31/2006) | $6,605 | $6,605 | Budget is the same. | |
Work Element Budget (Current Performance Period) | $6,605 | $6,605 | Budget is the same. |
Sort | Type | Title | Start | End | Status | Modified By | Modified Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | Identify potential options | 11/4/2005 | 12/31/2006 | Concluded | Linda Hermeston (Inactive) | 10/2/2006 2:53:30 PM | |
Description: Meet with representatives from DFO, MOWLAP, ONA, CCT, consultants and others to develop a list of options for fish passage at McIntyre Dam. | |||||||
B | Lead discussion and review of each option | 11/4/2005 | 12/31/2006 | Concluded | Linda Hermeston (Inactive) | 10/2/2006 2:53:30 PM | |
Description: Develop criteria and identify concerns to adequately analyze each option for fish passage at McIntyre Dam. | |||||||
C | Identify fatal flaws or pros and cons for each option | 11/4/2005 | 12/31/2006 | Concluded | Linda Hermeston (Inactive) | 10/2/2006 2:53:30 PM | |
Description: Develop a short list (1 or 2) of preferred options based upon critical review. | |||||||
D | DELIV | Identify alternatives for fish passage at McIntyre Dam | 12/31/2006 | Concluded | Linda Hermeston (Inactive) | 10/2/2006 2:53:31 PM | |
Description: Coordinate multiple agencies to develop options for fish passage and evaluate for feasibility. The results of these meetings will identify one or two preferred options to further analyze by a selected engineering firm. |