Show new navigation
On
  • Help
    • Help
    • How Do I?
    • Why Do I?
    • Help Center
    • Data dictionary
    • EF&W Program documents
    • Request support
    • Send feedback
      • View all help topics
Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program
  • Mitigation work
    Mitigation work View all mitigation work topics
  • Reporting
    Reporting View all reporting topics
  • Funding
    Funding View all funding topics
  • Search
Close NoticeNotice: ATTENTION BPA USERS: The data sync between Asset Suite and CBFish failed last night, so changes made in Asset Suite yesterday are not reflected in CBFish today. Note that changes made within CBFish are not impacted.
Close Notice
Back to SOW

This page provides details of the selected work element.

Work Element Summary PDF
Select a work element:

Contract Number:
29562
Contract Title:
200305400 GRN REPRO OF STEELHEAD IN HOOD RIVER
Contract Start Date:
10/1/2006
Contract End Date:
9/30/2007
WE ID:
162. Analyze/Interpret Data
Work Element Usage Report
Title:
B: 162 - Data Analysis
Description:
Analysis of data collected to date. Each year we will update our estimate of the relative fitness of wild vs. hatchery as each new run year of offspring is genotyped. Results of analyses of data collected for the year will be included in final report.
WE Agreement Type:
Contracted
Deliverable Specification:
This year's analyses will be to: (1) Compare fitness of winter run Hnew vs. wild in run year 1999. This year will be particularly interesting because it will provide the second comparison of wild versus the two types of supplementation fish – those with two wild parents as broodstock (Hnew-wxw), and those having a wild parent and a hatchery parent as broodstock (Hnew-hxw). Thus, with the addition of this run year we will have comparisons between wild and Hnew-wxw in each of five years (from 1995 to 1999) and of Hnew-wxw vs. Hnew-hxw in each of two years. (2) We will analyze the relative fitness of summer Hold vs. wild in run year 1993. With the addition of this run year we will have analyzed five of the six run years in which we can compare Hold vs. wild in the summer run (1992 is the remaining year, and we will be working through that backlog of samples during the upcoming year. (3) We will continue our methodological work on the estimation of effective size in supplemented populations. Analyses will be ongoing during the year, but the main questions are to be answered at the end of the contract period.
WSE Effective Budget:
$88,639
% of Total WSE Effective Budget:
32.00%
WSE Start:
07/01/2007
WSE End:
09/30/2007
WSE Completion:
09/30/2007
WSE Progress:
Concluded
WSE ID Continued From:
n/a
WSE ID Continued To:
n/a
Finite or Recurring:
Recurring

Back To Top

Budget History

SOWRevision Planned Updated Contractor Comments (optional) BPA Comments (optional)
Work Element Budget (Current Performance Period) $93,022 $88,639

Back To Top

Milestones

2 Milestones
Sort Type Title Start End Status Modified By Modified Date
A Begin interpretation of genotype data 7/1/2007 9/30/2007 Concluded Tracy Hauser 8/8/2006 4:04:50 PM
Description: Interpretation of data to be described in annual report
B DELIV Complete interpretation of data 9/30/2007 Concluded Michael Blouin 8/24/2006 5:50:58 PM
Description: This year's analyses will be to: (1) Compare fitness of winter run Hnew vs. wild in run year 1999. This year will be particularly interesting because it will provide the second comparison of wild versus the two types of supplementation fish – those with two wild parents as broodstock (Hnew-wxw), and those having a wild parent and a hatchery parent as broodstock (Hnew-hxw). Thus, with the addition of this run year we will have comparisons between wild and Hnew-wxw in each of five years (from 1995 to 1999) and of Hnew-wxw vs. Hnew-hxw in each of two years. (2) We will analyze the relative fitness of summer Hold vs. wild in run year 1993. With the addition of this run year we will have analyzed five of the six run years in which we can compare Hold vs. wild in the summer run (1992 is the remaining year, and we will be working through that backlog of samples during the upcoming year. (3) We will continue our methodological work on the estimation of effective size in supplemented populations. Analyses will be ongoing during the year, but the main questions are to be answered at the end of the contract period.

Back To Top

Metrics

Implementation Metrics
Metric Planned Actual Contractor Comments Measures HLIs
1464. Primary R, M, and E Focal Strategy [Population Status, Hydrosystem, Tributary Habitat, Estuary/Ocean, Harvest, Hatchery, Predation, Multiple Strategies] Multiple Strategies Hatchery
1472. Primary R, M, and E Type [Status and Trend Monitoring, Action Effectiveness Research, Uncertainties Research, Project Implementation/ Compliance Monitoring] Uncertainty Research Uncertainty Research

Back To Top

Location

<a target='blank' href='https://www.monitoringresources.org/Designer/Design/Index'>Location data for Area of Inference (AOI) should be entered into MonitoringResources.org. Click here to go to that site.</a>
Back To Top

Focal Species

Primary Focal Species:
Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Lower Columbia River DPS (Threatened)
Secondary Focal Species:
None

Back To Top

Environmental Compliance

This work element does not require Environmental Compliance
Back To Top

RM&E Metadata

Data Repositories:
""
Study Plan:
""
Area of Inference:
""

Back To Top