Show new navigation
On
Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program
Close NoticeNotice: ATTENTION BPA USERS: The data sync between Asset Suite and CBFish failed last night, so changes made in Asset Suite yesterday are not reflected in CBFish today. Note that changes made within CBFish are not impacted.
Close Notice
Select a work element:
Contract Number:
Contract Title:
1996 005 00 INDEPENDENT SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD
Contract Start Date:
1/1/2005
Contract End Date:
9/30/2005
Title:
H: 122 - Review of NOAA Fisheries' Draft ESA Analyses
Description:
A. Technical Recovery Team Draft Products
NOAA Fisheries may request the ISAB to review draft products of TRTs addressing Columbia River salmon listings. The TRTs are multi-agency technical workgroups lead by NOAA-Fisheries. Staff of the Northwest or Southwest Fisheries Science Center chair each of the TRTs. The initial task of all of the TRTs is to determine preliminary biological criteria necessary to ensure the viability of Evolutionarily Significant Units (ESUs) listed under the Endangered Species Act and then to help develop and evaluate various options for meeting these criteria (for general information on recovery planning see www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/trt/index.html).

In FY 2004, at NOAA Fisheries' request, the ISAB reviewed a TRT draft document titled Independent Populations of Chinook, Steelhead, and Sockeye for Listed Evolutionarily Significant Units Within the Interior Columbia River Domain, which was produced by the Interior Columbia River Technical Recovery Team. For FY 2005, NOAA Fisheries is likely to request that the ISAB review additional Columbia River TRT documents. The anticipated ISAB budget to participate in reviews of TRT drafts is $20,000.

B. Scientific Issues related to the evaluation of extinction risk of complex taxa
NOAA-Fisheries is currently dealing with two interesting and potentially controversial scientific problems. The first relates to how to biologically evaluate the contribution that hatchery fish make toward an ESU's viability. This topic is particularly important due to NOAA-Fisheries' Proposed Policy on evaluating hatchery fish in ESA listing decisions, which was released for public comment in June, 2004. The second issue relates to how to evaluate the viability of Oncorhynchus mykiss ESUs that contain both resident and anadromous populations. Some of the O. mykiss ESUs identified by NOAA-Fisheries as threatened or endangered under the ESA also contain resident components that were not listed. NOAA Fisheries may seek the ISAB's advice on how to evaluate the contribution to viability made by resident populations. These reviews would likely follow completion of the ISAB's Harvest Report and begin in January 2005.
WE Agreement Type:
Contracted
Deliverable Specification:
DELIVERABLE SPECIFICATION

Reviews of TRT draft products, if requested, and an evaluation of how hatchery fish and resident fish may affect an ESU's viability.
______________________________

MILESTONE DESCRIPTION

(see Deliverable)
______________________________

[The above merge of the DELIVERABLE SPECIFICATION and MILESTONE DESCRIPTION for the deliverable milestone was done by Pisces on 06/24/2005 due to changes in the data model.]
WSE Effective Budget:
$40,000
% of Total WSE Effective Budget:
11.27%
WSE Start:
01/15/2005
WSE End:
04/30/2005
WSE Completion:
WSE Progress:
Other
WSE ID Continued From:
[Unassigned]
WSE ID Continued To:
[Unassigned]
Finite or Recurring:
Finite

SOWRevision Planned Updated Contractor Comments (optional) BPA Comments (optional)
Work Element Budget (Current Performance Period) $40,000 $40,000

2 Milestones
Sort Type Title Start End Status Modified By Modified Date
A Evaluate ESU viability with hatchery and/or resident components 1/15/2005 4/30/2005 Active
Description: Independent Scientific Advisory Board's report and report submittal letter answering five questions asked by NOAA-Fisheries Northwest Science Center
B DELIV Deliverable complete 4/30/2005 Active
Description: DELIVERABLE SPECIFICATION Reviews of TRT draft products, if requested, and an evaluation of how hatchery fish and resident fish may affect an ESU's viability. ______________________________ MILESTONE DESCRIPTION (see Deliverable) ______________________________ [The above merge of the DELIVERABLE SPECIFICATION and MILESTONE DESCRIPTION for the deliverable milestone was done by Pisces on 06/24/2005 due to changes in the data model.]

This work element does not require Metrics
This work element does not require Focal Species
This work element does not require Environmental Compliance
This work element does not require RM&E metadata