| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|---|
| A | 29 | Increase Aquatic and/or Floodplain Complexity | Install Beaver Dam Support structures | Fieldwork. Install beaver dam support (BDS) structures in Bridge Ck as specified by EC, annual work plan and ISEMP Bridge Ck. IMW experimental design.
This WE is integrated with, but does not duplicate any work specified by, contract 45470 WE O (Eco Logical Research Inc). This WE will provide field technicians through existing NOAA contracting vehicles to assist with ISEMP restoration actions in Bridge Ck. | A | EC | Environmental compliance requirements complete | 05/01/2010 | 05/15/2010 | Concluded | David Byrnes (Inactive) | 05/24/2010 2:48 PM |
| A | 29 | Increase Aquatic and/or Floodplain Complexity | Install Beaver Dam Support structures | Fieldwork. Install beaver dam support (BDS) structures in Bridge Ck as specified by EC, annual work plan and ISEMP Bridge Ck. IMW experimental design.
This WE is integrated with, but does not duplicate any work specified by, contract 45470 WE O (Eco Logical Research Inc). This WE will provide field technicians through existing NOAA contracting vehicles to assist with ISEMP restoration actions in Bridge Ck. | B | Suggested | Site Plan to include maps, structure types and locations. | 05/01/2010 | 07/01/2010 | Concluded | David Byrnes (Inactive) | 05/24/2010 2:48 PM |
| A | 29 | Increase Aquatic and/or Floodplain Complexity | Install Beaver Dam Support structures | Fieldwork. Install beaver dam support (BDS) structures in Bridge Ck as specified by EC, annual work plan and ISEMP Bridge Ck. IMW experimental design.
This WE is integrated with, but does not duplicate any work specified by, contract 45470 WE O (Eco Logical Research Inc). This WE will provide field technicians through existing NOAA contracting vehicles to assist with ISEMP restoration actions in Bridge Ck. | C | Suggested | Materials for structures purchased and staged at implementation sites | 06/01/2010 | 08/01/2010 | Concluded | David Byrnes (Inactive) | 05/24/2010 2:48 PM |
| A | 29 | Increase Aquatic and/or Floodplain Complexity | Install Beaver Dam Support structures | Fieldwork. Install beaver dam support (BDS) structures in Bridge Ck as specified by EC, annual work plan and ISEMP Bridge Ck. IMW experimental design.
This WE is integrated with, but does not duplicate any work specified by, contract 45470 WE O (Eco Logical Research Inc). This WE will provide field technicians through existing NOAA contracting vehicles to assist with ISEMP restoration actions in Bridge Ck. | D | Suggested | Completion of all structure implementation for the specific system | 08/01/2010 | 11/01/2010 | Concluded | David Byrnes (Inactive) | 05/24/2010 2:48 PM |
| A | 29 | Increase Aquatic and/or Floodplain Complexity | Install Beaver Dam Support structures | Fieldwork. Install beaver dam support (BDS) structures in Bridge Ck as specified by EC, annual work plan and ISEMP Bridge Ck. IMW experimental design.
This WE is integrated with, but does not duplicate any work specified by, contract 45470 WE O (Eco Logical Research Inc). This WE will provide field technicians through existing NOAA contracting vehicles to assist with ISEMP restoration actions in Bridge Ck. | E | DELIV | In-water work -- Beaver Dam Support | | 04/30/2011 | Concluded | David Byrnes (Inactive) | 05/24/2010 2:48 PM |
| B | 157 | Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data | Monitor Beaver Dam Support structures | Fieldwork. Monitoring the status and condition of beaver ponds and Beaver Dam Support (BDS) structures in Bridge and Murderers Ck. | A | EC | Environmental compliance requirements complete | 05/01/2010 | 05/15/2010 | Concluded | David Byrnes (Inactive) | 05/24/2010 2:48 PM |
| B | 157 | Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data | Monitor Beaver Dam Support structures | Fieldwork. Monitoring the status and condition of beaver ponds and Beaver Dam Support (BDS) structures in Bridge and Murderers Ck. | B | | Seasonal beaver pond monitoring | 05/01/2010 | 01/01/2011 | Concluded | David Byrnes (Inactive) | 05/24/2010 2:48 PM |
| B | 157 | Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data | Monitor Beaver Dam Support structures | Fieldwork. Monitoring the status and condition of beaver ponds and Beaver Dam Support (BDS) structures in Bridge and Murderers Ck. | C | | Seasonal BDS monitoring | 05/01/2010 | 01/01/2011 | Concluded | David Byrnes (Inactive) | 05/24/2010 2:48 PM |
| B | 157 | Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data | Monitor Beaver Dam Support structures | Fieldwork. Monitoring the status and condition of beaver ponds and Beaver Dam Support (BDS) structures in Bridge and Murderers Ck. | D | DELIV | Beaver Pond and BDS monitoring data | | 04/30/2011 | Concluded | David Byrnes (Inactive) | 05/24/2010 2:48 PM |
| C | 157 | Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data | Monitor Beaver Population | Fieldwork. Beaver survival monitoring. How are beaver colonies and individuals responding the the habitat modification work implemented in Bridge Ck. Since beavers are the main change agents for this restoration work, we must monitor our attempts to stabilize colony location and survival to asses this aspect of the overall restoration methodology | A | EC | Environmental compliance requirements complete | 05/01/2010 | 05/15/2010 | Concluded | David Byrnes (Inactive) | 05/24/2010 2:48 PM |
| C | 157 | Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data | Monitor Beaver Population | Fieldwork. Beaver survival monitoring. How are beaver colonies and individuals responding the the habitat modification work implemented in Bridge Ck. Since beavers are the main change agents for this restoration work, we must monitor our attempts to stabilize colony location and survival to asses this aspect of the overall restoration methodology | B | | Finalize beaver population monitoring protocols | 05/01/2010 | 07/01/2010 | Concluded | David Byrnes (Inactive) | 05/24/2010 2:48 PM |
| C | 157 | Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data | Monitor Beaver Population | Fieldwork. Beaver survival monitoring. How are beaver colonies and individuals responding the the habitat modification work implemented in Bridge Ck. Since beavers are the main change agents for this restoration work, we must monitor our attempts to stabilize colony location and survival to asses this aspect of the overall restoration methodology | C | | Field survey to monitor winter survival of beaver | 11/01/2010 | 03/31/2011 | Concluded | David Byrnes (Inactive) | 05/24/2010 2:48 PM |
| C | 157 | Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data | Monitor Beaver Population | Fieldwork. Beaver survival monitoring. How are beaver colonies and individuals responding the the habitat modification work implemented in Bridge Ck. Since beavers are the main change agents for this restoration work, we must monitor our attempts to stabilize colony location and survival to asses this aspect of the overall restoration methodology | D | | Measure population size and colony structure | 05/01/2010 | 04/30/2011 | Concluded | David Byrnes (Inactive) | 05/24/2010 2:48 PM |
| C | 157 | Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data | Monitor Beaver Population | Fieldwork. Beaver survival monitoring. How are beaver colonies and individuals responding the the habitat modification work implemented in Bridge Ck. Since beavers are the main change agents for this restoration work, we must monitor our attempts to stabilize colony location and survival to asses this aspect of the overall restoration methodology | E | DELIV | Beaver survival monitoring | | 04/30/2011 | Concluded | David Byrnes (Inactive) | 05/24/2010 2:48 PM |
| D | 162 | Analyze/Interpret Data | Develop models of learning and information flow | Population scale fish and habitat status and trends monitoring and watershed scale effectiveness monitoring and restoration action implementation are key objectives of the co-manager community in the Columbia River basin. Currently these activities are undertaken on an agency by agency or watershed by watershed basis without any real infrastructure for learning and information flow to be established between units. ISEMP is working to standardize methods and approaches for this work, and even within a watershed considerable learning and information flow is required in order to successfully transfer project tools to the local community. Potential barriers to this information transfer exist in that ways of doing monitoring and restoration work have been to a large extent engrained by practitioners as a culture. Therefore, strong social barriers exist for scientific or technical information to be incorporated and long-standing methods altered. The goal of this Work Element is to develop an understanding of the social framework in which ISEMP work exists, the framework of the co-manager community with which we collaborate, and the framework of the broader community that may not be directly involved, but which may be interested in adopting project output. The objective of this WE is to learn how to make information transfer more efficient and effective from the research and development component of RME to the applied, practitioner community. | A | | Develop preliminary relationship and structure model | 05/01/2010 | 04/30/2011 | Concluded | David Byrnes (Inactive) | 05/24/2010 2:48 PM |
| D | 162 | Analyze/Interpret Data | Develop models of learning and information flow | Population scale fish and habitat status and trends monitoring and watershed scale effectiveness monitoring and restoration action implementation are key objectives of the co-manager community in the Columbia River basin. Currently these activities are undertaken on an agency by agency or watershed by watershed basis without any real infrastructure for learning and information flow to be established between units. ISEMP is working to standardize methods and approaches for this work, and even within a watershed considerable learning and information flow is required in order to successfully transfer project tools to the local community. Potential barriers to this information transfer exist in that ways of doing monitoring and restoration work have been to a large extent engrained by practitioners as a culture. Therefore, strong social barriers exist for scientific or technical information to be incorporated and long-standing methods altered. The goal of this Work Element is to develop an understanding of the social framework in which ISEMP work exists, the framework of the co-manager community with which we collaborate, and the framework of the broader community that may not be directly involved, but which may be interested in adopting project output. The objective of this WE is to learn how to make information transfer more efficient and effective from the research and development component of RME to the applied, practitioner community. | B | | Field site visits | 06/15/2010 | 09/30/2010 | Concluded | David Byrnes (Inactive) | 05/24/2010 2:48 PM |
| D | 162 | Analyze/Interpret Data | Develop models of learning and information flow | Population scale fish and habitat status and trends monitoring and watershed scale effectiveness monitoring and restoration action implementation are key objectives of the co-manager community in the Columbia River basin. Currently these activities are undertaken on an agency by agency or watershed by watershed basis without any real infrastructure for learning and information flow to be established between units. ISEMP is working to standardize methods and approaches for this work, and even within a watershed considerable learning and information flow is required in order to successfully transfer project tools to the local community. Potential barriers to this information transfer exist in that ways of doing monitoring and restoration work have been to a large extent engrained by practitioners as a culture. Therefore, strong social barriers exist for scientific or technical information to be incorporated and long-standing methods altered. The goal of this Work Element is to develop an understanding of the social framework in which ISEMP work exists, the framework of the co-manager community with which we collaborate, and the framework of the broader community that may not be directly involved, but which may be interested in adopting project output. The objective of this WE is to learn how to make information transfer more efficient and effective from the research and development component of RME to the applied, practitioner community. | C | DELIV | Social structure underlying community of practice fish and habitat monitoring and restoration work. | | 04/30/2011 | Concluded | David Byrnes (Inactive) | 05/24/2010 2:48 PM |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Help
Mitigation work
Reporting
Funding
Search
Log in
