| | | | | | | | | |
---|
A | 18182 | 165 | Produce Environmental Compliance Documentation | Ensure proper environmental clearance | Will work with BPA environmental staff if necessary to ensure proper environmental clearance is in place on work elements requiring environmental clearance. | $0 | 0.00% | 10/01/2006 | 10/31/2006 |
B | 17334 | 157 | Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data | Reference site physical habitat characteristics | Quantify the physical characteristics that define suitable fall Chinook spawning habitat the tailwater reference site (Wanapum Dam). Map spawning areas at the reference site. Use existing data indicating spawning areas and redd locations. If necessary, collect aerial photography to delineate spawning areas. Collect data on the physical characteristics of the spawning areas and throughout the reference site. The data to be collected will be metrics of physiography, hydrologic regime, channel morphology, substrate, hydraulics, water quality, and hyporheic exchange. The data will support analyses of habitat quantity and quality. | $0 | 0.00% | 10/01/2006 | 09/30/2007 |
C | 17335 | 157 | Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data | Lower Snake River physical habitat characteristics | Using the physical characteristics identified at the reference site in Work Element A, quantify the physical characteristics at each of the Snake River study sites. Conduct a thorough analysis and summary of existing data for study sites, including site visits for reconnaissance level work. The research will be carried out in two phases at each site. The first phase involves estimating the quantity of potential fall Chinook salmon spawning habitat, while the second phase involves evaluating the quality of the potential habitat. Collect data on the physical characteristics of the study sites. The data to be collected will be metrics of physiography, hydrologic regime, channel morphology, substrate, hydraulics, water quality, and hyporheic exchange. These data will support the setup of a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model that will estimate hydraulic characteristics within each study site for different flow regimes. Estimating hydraulic characteristics through the use of a hydrodynamic model is necessary because the study sites are currently impounded. The data will support analyses of habitat quantity and quality. During years 1 (FY07) and 2 (FY08) we will evaluate the quality of potential habitat at the Ice Harbor and Lower Granite study sites, and the quantity of potential habitat at the Lower Monumental and Little Goose study sites. Years 2 (FY08) and 3 (FY09) of the study will focus on modeling alternative flow scenarios and evaluating habitat quality at the Lower Monumental and Little Goose study sites. | $46,144 | 97.88% | 10/01/2006 | 09/30/2007 |
D | 17348 | 162 | Analyze/Interpret Data | Analyze lower Snake River study sites | Apply hydrodynamic model(s) to the study sites to estimate two-dimensional hydraulic characteristics under different flow scenarios. Estimating hydraulic characteristics through the use of a hydrodynamic model is necessary because the study sites are currently impounded. Scenarios would include incremental drawdown of forebay elevations between spillway crest and normal operating pool, including an elevation that would allow the travel of shallow draft barges. The modeling evaluation would also include an analysis of flow scenarios by water-year type (extremely wet, wet, normal, dry, extremely dry) to account for natural variation in hydrologic regime. Water-year types would be determined based on runoff volume at The Dalles Dam by July 1.
To simulate the spatial distribution of water depth and velocity under different project operating conditions, it is proposed that a two-dimensional depth-averaged hydrodynamic and water quality model be applied to the Ice Harbor and Lower Granite tailraces. We propose to use the existing two-dimensional MASS2 (Richmond et al., 2000) model to simulate the majority of the river section (i.e. from below Lower Granite Dam to the river's confluence with the Columbia). The MASS2 model has already been applied to these river reaches. In this project we will update the bathymetry, computational grid, and perform additional validation simulations using velocity and stage data collected for this project.
MASS2 is a two-dimensional depth-averaged hydrodynamic and water quality model. The model simulates time-varying distributions of the depth-averaged velocities, water temperature, and total dissolved gas. The model is a finite-volume code that is formulated using the general principles described by Patankar (1980), and uses a structured multi-block scheme on a curvilinear grid system. Heat exchange at the air-water surface is computed using a physical based approach based upon commonly observed meteorological conditions (Edinger et al., 1974). Dissolved gas concentrations are transported using the two-dimensional form of the advection-diffusion equation, with appropriate source/sink terms for gas exchange. The model also includes a wetting-drying algorithm to simulate conditions where the wetted channel area is initially unknown or varies in time because the upstream inflow and/or downstream stage are unsteady. The wetting-drying capability is currently being used in unsteady simulations of hydraulic conditions in the Hanford Reach of the Columbia River.
MASS2 has previously been calibrated and verified to portions of the Columbia and Snake River systems, including the lower Snake River from LGR to the Columbia River confluence (Richmond et al., 1999a). The model was then used to simulate gas concentrations under various flow release alternatives (Richmond et al., 2000). MASS2 has also been applied to simulate the sediment erosion and deposition in the river under impounded (current) and unimpounded (four lower Snake dams removed) conditions (Richmond et al., 1999b). | $0 | 0.00% | 10/01/2006 | 09/30/2007 |
E | 17349 | 162 | Analyze/Interpret Data | Compare data at Columbia and Snake River tailrace sites | Determine if physical characteristics at study sites resemble those at reference site. This involves comparing the physical processes measured and modeled at the reference site with the physical processes modeled and measured at the study sites. | $0 | 0.00% | 10/01/2006 | 09/30/2007 |
F | 17350 | 132 | Produce Progress (Annual) Report | Produce FY07 annual report | Complete a report summarizing the activities, accomplishments, and results to-date for FY07. | $0 | 0.00% | 01/01/2007 | 09/30/2007 |
G | 17352 | 119 | Manage and Administer Projects | Project management | Provide oversight on the project throughout the performance period. Respond to BPA as requested, providing financial, contractual, and administrative documents. Prepare FY 2007 Statement of Work and submit no less than 90 days before end of current contract. | $1,000 | 2.12% | 05/15/2007 | 09/30/2007 |
H | 17353 | 185 | Produce CBFish Status Report | Periodic Status Reports for BPA | The Contractor shall report on the status of milestones and deliverables in Pisces. Reports shall be completed either monthly or quarterly as determined by the BPA COTR. Additionally, when indicating a deliverable milestone as COMPLETE, the contractor shall provide metrics and the final location (latitude and longitude) prior to submitting the report to the BPA COTR. | $0 | 0.00% | 01/01/2007 | 09/30/2007 |