Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program
RSS Feed for updates to Project 1997-030-00 - Secesh chinook & Joseph Creek steelhead abundance monitoring Follow this via RSS feed. Help setting up RSS feeds?

Project Summary

Project 1997-030-00 - Secesh chinook & Joseph Creek steelhead abundance monitoring
Project Number:
1997-030-00
Title:
Secesh chinook & Joseph Creek steelhead abundance monitoring
Summary:
The Chinook Salmon Adult Abundance Monitoring project collects data for long term monitoring of trends in wild chinook salmon adult escapement and productivity. This information is used for effective resource management and for use in threatened species recovery monitoring. Wild salmon escapement monitoring occurs in the Secesh River and the information provides for supplementation program reference stream comparison.
Proposer:
None
Proponent Orgs:
Nez Perce Tribe (Tribe)
Starting FY:
2004
Ending FY:
2019
Stage:
Area:
Province Subbasin %
Mountain Snake Salmon 100.00%
Purpose:
Artificial Production
Emphasis:
RM and E
Focal Species:
Chinook - Snake River Spring/Summer ESU
Steelhead - Snake River DPS
Trout, Bull
Species Benefit:
Anadromous: 100.0%   Resident: 0.0%   Wildlife: 0.0%
Special:
None
BiOp Association:
FCRPS 2008 – view list of FCRPS 2008 BiOp Actions

RPA 50.4 Fund pilot studies in Wenatchee/Methow/Entiat,
RPA 50.4 Fund pilot studies in Wenatchee/Methow/Entiat,
RPA 50.4 Fund pilot studies in Wenatchee/Methow/Entiat,
RPA 50.4 Fund pilot studies in Wenatchee/Methow/Entiat,
RPA 50.4 Fund pilot studies in Wenatchee/Methow/Entiat,
RPA 50.4 Fund pilot studies in Wenatchee/Methow/Entiat,
RPA 50.4 Fund pilot studies in Wenatchee/Methow/Entiat,
RPA 50.4 Fund pilot studies in Wenatchee/Methow/Entiat,
RPA 50.4 Fund pilot studies in Wenatchee/Methow/Entiat,
RPA 50.4 Fund pilot studies in Wenatchee/Methow/Entiat,
RPA 50.4 Fund pilot studies in Wenatchee/Methow/Entiat,
RPA 50.6 Review/modify existing fish pop status monitoring projects,
RPA 50.6 Review/modify existing fish pop status monitoring projects,
RPA 50.6 Review/modify existing fish pop status monitoring projects,
RPA 50.6 Review/modify existing fish pop status monitoring projects,
RPA 50.6 Review/modify existing fish pop status monitoring projects,
RPA 50.6 Review/modify existing fish pop status monitoring projects,
RPA 50.6 Review/modify existing fish pop status monitoring projects,
RPA 50.6 Review/modify existing fish pop status monitoring projects,
RPA 50.6 Review/modify existing fish pop status monitoring projects,
RPA 50.6 Review/modify existing fish pop status monitoring projects,
RPA 50.6 Review/modify existing fish pop status monitoring projects,
RPA 51.1 Synthesize fish pop metrics thru Regional Data Repositories,
RPA 51.1 Synthesize fish pop metrics thru Regional Data Repositories,
RPA 51.1 Synthesize fish pop metrics thru Regional Data Repositories,
RPA 51.1 Synthesize fish pop metrics thru Regional Data Repositories,
RPA 51.1 Synthesize fish pop metrics thru Regional Data Repositories,
RPA 51.1 Synthesize fish pop metrics thru Regional Data Repositories,
RPA 51.1 Synthesize fish pop metrics thru Regional Data Repositories,
RPA 51.1 Synthesize fish pop metrics thru Regional Data Repositories,
RPA 51.1 Synthesize fish pop metrics thru Regional Data Repositories,
RPA 51.1 Synthesize fish pop metrics thru Regional Data Repositories,
RPA 51.1 Synthesize fish pop metrics thru Regional Data Repositories,
RPA 62.4 Support coded-wire tagging to hatchery rates,
RPA 62.4 Support coded-wire tagging to hatchery rates,
RPA 62.4 Support coded-wire tagging to hatchery rates,
RPA 62.4 Support coded-wire tagging to hatchery rates,
RPA 62.4 Support coded-wire tagging to hatchery rates,
RPA 62.4 Support coded-wire tagging to hatchery rates,
RPA 62.5 Investigate feasibility of genetic stock id techniques,
RPA 62.5 Investigate feasibility of genetic stock id techniques,
RPA 62.5 Investigate feasibility of genetic stock id techniques,
RPA 62.5 Investigate feasibility of genetic stock id techniques,
RPA 62.5 Investigate feasibility of genetic stock id techniques,
RPA 62.5 Investigate feasibility of genetic stock id techniques,
RPA 64.2 Determine if artificial production contributes to recovery,
RPA 64.2 Determine if artificial production contributes to recovery,
RPA 64.2 Determine if artificial production contributes to recovery,
RPA 64.2 Determine if artificial production contributes to recovery,
RPA 64.2 Determine if artificial production contributes to recovery,
RPA 64.2 Determine if artificial production contributes to recovery,
RPA 64.2 Determine if artificial production contributes to recovery,
RPA 64.2 Determine if artificial production contributes to recovery,
RPA 64.2 Determine if artificial production contributes to recovery,
RPA 64.2 Determine if artificial production contributes to recovery,
RPA 64.2 Determine if artificial production contributes to recovery

Description: Page: 11 Figure 1: Location of the DIDSON monitoring site in the Secesh River.

Project(s): 1997-030-00

Document: P123117

Dimensions: 1275 x 1650

Description: Page: 15 Figure 3a: Photograph of the DIDSON salmon escapement monitoring site in the Secesh River during high water conditions on natural stream substrate.

Project(s): 1997-030-00

Document: P123117

Dimensions: 932 x 621

Description: Page: 15 Figure 3b: Photograph of the DIDSON salmon escapement monitoring site in the Secesh River during low summer stream flow conditions on natural stream substrate.

Project(s): 1997-030-00

Document: P123117

Dimensions: 928 x 637

Description: Page: 16 Figure 4: Topside box with laptop computer that collects DIDSON files on an external hard drive, and quadplexes optical camera data with the DIDSON signal on a DVR for validation studies.

Project(s): 1997-030-00

Document: P123117

Dimensions: 1024 x 768


Summary of Budgets

To view all expenditures for all fiscal years, click "Project Exp. by FY"

To see more detailed project budget information, please visit the "Project Budget" page

No Decided Budget Transfers

Pending Budget Decision?  No


Actual Project Cost Share

Current Fiscal Year — 2025
Cost Share Partner Total Proposed Contribution Total Confirmed Contribution
There are no project cost share contributions to show.
Previous Fiscal Years
Fiscal Year Total Contributions % of Budget
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007

Contracts

The table below contains contracts with the following statuses: Active, Closed, Complete, History, Issued.
* "Total Contracted Amount" column includes contracted amount from both capital and expense components of the contract.
Expense Contracts:
Number Contractor Name Title Status Total Contracted Amount Dates
333 REL 31 SOW Nez Perce Tribe 1997-30 LISTED STOCK CHINOOK ESCAPEMENT MONITORING History $76,949 1/1/2000 - 2/28/2001
4600 SOW Nez Perce Tribe 1997-030-00 LISTED STOCK CHINOOK ESCAPEMENT MONITORING History $1,075,068 4/12/2001 - 12/31/2004
652 REL 25 SOW Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 1997-030-00 CHINOOK SALMON ADULT ABUNDANCE MONITORING Closed $98,957 12/1/2002 - 12/31/2004
15404 SOW Ocean Marine Industries, Inc. PI 1997-030-00 CHINOOK SALMON ADULT ABUNDANCE MONITORING History $78,050 10/1/2003 - 2/25/2004
20615 SOW Nez Perce Tribe 1997 030 00 LISTED STOCK CHINOOK ESCAPEMENT MONITORING History $398,835 1/1/2005 - 12/31/2005
25619 SOW Nez Perce Tribe 1997 030 00 CHINOOK SALMON ADULT ABUNDANCE MONITORING History $388,275 1/1/2006 - 12/31/2006
30562 SOW Nez Perce Tribe 1997 030 00 CHINOOK SALMON ADULT ABUNDANCE MONITORING Closed $297,195 1/1/2007 - 12/31/2007
35429 SOW Nez Perce Tribe 199703000 EXP CHINOOK SALMON ADULT ABUNDANCE MONITORING Closed $299,529 1/1/2008 - 12/31/2008
40142 SOW Nez Perce Tribe 199703000 EXP CHINOOK SALMON ADULT ABUNDANCE MONITORING Closed $299,856 1/1/2009 - 12/31/2009
BPA-005220 Bonneville Power Administration PIT TAGS - STEELHEAD IN JOSEPH CREEK - FAST TRACK Active $3,442 10/1/2009 - 9/30/2010
45340 SOW Nez Perce Tribe 199703000 EXP BIOP CHINOOK SALMON ADULT ABUNDANCE MONITORING Closed $475,008 1/1/2010 - 12/31/2010
BPA-005605 Bonneville Power Administration PIT TAGS - STEELHEAD IN JOSEPH CREEK Active $0 10/1/2010 - 9/30/2011
50063 SOW Nez Perce Tribe 199703000 EXP CHINOOK/STEELHEAD ADULT ABUNDANCE MONITORING Closed $434,907 1/1/2011 - 12/31/2011
BPA-006245 Bonneville Power Administration PIT Tags - Steelhead in Joseph Creek Active $3,872 10/1/2011 - 9/30/2012
55018 SOW Nez Perce Tribe 1997-030-00 EXP CHINOOK/STEELHEAD ADULT ABUNDANCE MONITORING Closed $553,522 1/1/2012 - 12/31/2012
59539 SOW Nez Perce Tribe 1997-030-00 EXP CHINOOK/STEELHEAD ADULT ABUNDANCE MONITORING Closed $466,965 1/1/2013 - 12/31/2013
BPA-007732 Bonneville Power Administration PIT Tags - Steelhead in Joseph Creek Active $592 10/1/2013 - 9/30/2014
63467 SOW Nez Perce Tribe 1997-030-00 EXP SECESH CHINOOK & JOSEPH CREEK STEELHEAD ABUNDANCE Closed $495,744 1/1/2014 - 12/31/2014
BPA-008393 Bonneville Power Administration PIT Tags - Steelhead in Joseph Creek Active $2,433 10/1/2014 - 9/30/2015
67519 SOW Nez Perce Tribe 1997-030-00 EXP SECESH CHINOOK & JOSEPH CREEK STEELHEAD ABUNDANCE Closed $525,149 1/1/2015 - 12/31/2015
BPA-008916 Bonneville Power Administration PIT Tags - Steelhead in Joseph Creek Active $4,338 10/1/2015 - 9/30/2016
70924 SOW Nez Perce Tribe 1997-030-00 EXP SECESH CHINOOK & JOSEPH CRK STLHD ABUNDANCE Closed $546,557 1/1/2016 - 12/31/2016
BPA-009582 Bonneville Power Administration PIT Tags - Steelhead in Joseph Creek Active $1,700 10/1/2016 - 9/30/2017
74547 SOW Nez Perce Tribe 1997-030-00 EXP SECESH CHINOOK & JOSEPH CRK STLHD ABUNDANCE Closed $579,517 1/1/2017 - 12/31/2017
74017 REL 4 SOW Nez Perce Tribe 1997-030-00 EXP SECESH CHINOOK & JOSEPH CRK STLHD ABUNDANCE Closed $570,261 1/1/2018 - 12/31/2018



Annual Progress Reports
Expected (since FY2004):15
Completed:13
On time:13
Status Reports
Completed:54
On time:49
Avg Days Early:10

                Count of Contract Deliverables
Earliest Contract Subsequent Contracts Title Contractor Earliest Start Latest End Latest Status Accepted Reports Complete Green Yellow Red Total % Green and Complete Canceled
333 REL 31 4600, 20615, 25619, 30562, 35429, 40142, 45340, 50063, 55018, 59539, 63467, 67519, 70924, 74547, 74017 REL 4 1997-030-00 EXP SECESH CHINOOK & JOSEPH CRK STLHD ABUNDANCE Nez Perce Tribe 01/01/2000 12/31/2018 Closed 54 168 0 0 4 172 97.67% 2
BPA-5220 PIT TAGS - STEELHEAD IN JOSEPH CREEK - FAST TRACK Bonneville Power Administration 10/01/2009 09/30/2010 Active 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BPA-5605 PIT TAGS - STEELHEAD IN JOSEPH CREEK Bonneville Power Administration 10/01/2010 09/30/2011 Active 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BPA-6245 PIT Tags - Steelhead in Joseph Creek Bonneville Power Administration 10/01/2011 09/30/2012 Active 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BPA-7732 PIT Tags - Steelhead in Joseph Creek Bonneville Power Administration 10/01/2013 09/30/2014 Active 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BPA-8393 PIT Tags - Steelhead in Joseph Creek Bonneville Power Administration 10/01/2014 09/30/2015 Active 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BPA-8916 PIT Tags - Steelhead in Joseph Creek Bonneville Power Administration 10/01/2015 09/30/2016 Active 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BPA-9582 PIT Tags - Steelhead in Joseph Creek Bonneville Power Administration 10/01/2016 09/30/2017 Active 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Totals 54 168 0 0 4 172 97.67% 2


The table content is updated frequently and thus contains more recent information than what was in the original proposal reviewed by ISRP and Council.

Review: Fast Track ISRP Review 2010

Independent Scientific Review Panel Assessment

Assessment Number: 1997-030-00-ISRP-20100623
Project: 1997-030-00 - Secesh chinook & Joseph Creek steelhead abundance monitoring
Review: Fast Track ISRP Review 2010
Completed Date: None
First Round ISRP Date: 2/24/2010
First Round ISRP Rating: Meets Scientific Review Criteria
First Round ISRP Comment:

In general, this proposal demonstrates good fisheries science. However, parts of this project are difficult to assess. In particular, it’s a combination of two projects with little in common (different species, equipment, even subbasins), and the relation between them was unclear. The need for continued Chinook monitoring at Secesh was well documented, and the addition of steelhead trout monitoring at Joseph Creek is justified as a benefit to the Fish and Wildlife Program, but it is not clear why the new steelhead program is to be combined with the Chinook program. Why is the proposed steelhead weir in this proposal and not in Integrated Status and Effectiveness Monitoring project (ISEMP; BPA Project No. 200301700I) that has a fast-track proposal “to install two PIT tag arrays in lower Joseph Creek and two arrays in the lower Grande Ronde River?” 1. Technical Justification, Program Significance and Consistency, and Project Relationships The proposal has two parts: 1) The Secesh River is an unsupplemented stream, in the South Fork Salmon River drainage in Idaho, which acts as a reference stream for three ongoing Chinook supplementation evaluation programs. It is the only stream in the Snake River Basin where monitoring of natural origin salmon escapement occurs absent a hatchery supplementation program. Salmon escapement monitoring will be continued using dual frequency identification sonar (DIDSON). It was begun in 2004. 2) This project also includes the new fast track Joseph Creek steelhead escapement monitoring project. It would use a floating weir to provide status monitoring of adult steelhead in Joseph Creek in the lower Grande Ronde River in Washington. The Secesh DIDSON monitoring is effective. It is operational a high percentage of the time, produces a good count, and has been in operation for a number of years. The program is consistent with BiOp goals, etc. 2. Project History and Results The Secesh component has a long history. It has been yielding good results for at least 5 years from DIDSON technology. The Johnson Creek steelhead project is in early development–it's not even clear where an adult counting weir structure can be emplaced. 3. Objectives, Work Elements, and Methods PIT tag arrays have been installed in the lower Secesh River to quantify both natural origin adult salmon and steelhead escapement. A comparison of PIT tag array escapement data with DIDSON salmon escapement information collected by this proposal will be performed over a period of years. The objectives and methods proposed for use in Joseph Creek seem reasonable and appropriate. A detailed explanation of methods including statistical methods is provided

Documentation Links:
Review: RME / AP Category Review

Council Recommendation

Assessment Number: 1997-030-00-NPCC-20110502
Project: 1997-030-00 - Secesh chinook & Joseph Creek steelhead abundance monitoring
Review: RME / AP Category Review
Proposal: RMECAT-1997-030-00
Proposal State: Pending BPA Response
Approved Date: 6/10/2011
Recommendation: Fund (Qualified)
Comments: Implement with condition through 2016 per April-May 2010 decision for Fast Track projects: Implementation subject to regional hatchery effects evaluation process described in programmatic recommendation #4.
Conditions:
Council Condition #1 Programmatic Issue: RMECAT #4 Hatchery Effectiveness—subject to regional hatchery effects evaluation process

2008 FCRPS BiOp Workgroup Assessment

Assessment Number: 1997-030-00-BIOP-20101105
Project Number: 1997-030-00
Review: RME / AP Category Review
Proposal Number: RMECAT-1997-030-00
Completed Date: None
2008 FCRPS BiOp Workgroup Rating: Supports 2008 FCRPS BiOp
Comments: BiOp Workgroup Comments: No BiOp Workgroup comments

The BiOp RM&E Workgroups made the following determinations regarding the proposal's ability or need to support BiOp Research, Monitoring and Evaluation (RME) RPAs. If you have questions regarding these RPA association conclusions, please contact your BPA COTR and they will help clarify, or they will arrange further discussion with the appropriate RM&E Workgroup Leads. BiOp RPA associations for the proposed work are: (50.6 62.5 64.2)
All Questionable RPA Associations ( ) and
All Deleted RPA Associations (63.1)
Proponent Response:
This is response to a request to clarify linkage between the Chinook Salmon Adult Abundance Monitoring project and RPA 63.1. RPA 63.1 is designed to determine effect of safety-net & conservation hatchery programs: Determine the effect that safety-net and conservation hatchery programs have on the viability and recovery of the targeted populations of salmon and steelhead. The Secesh River natural origin Chinook salmon population acts as a control stream under the Idaho Salmon Supplementation studies (Bowles and Leitzinger 1991) and a reference stream for the Johnson Creek and Northeast Oregon Hatchery supplementation programs monitoring and evaluation plans (Vogel et al. 2005, Hesse et al. 2006). Adult escapement and progeny-per-parent ratio (productivity) information from a reference stream, the Secesh River, are compared to supplementation program performance to separate environmental effects from supplementation effects. 
Review: FY07-09 Solicitation Review

Council Recommendation

Assessment Number: 1997-030-00-NPCC-20090924
Project: 1997-030-00 - Secesh chinook & Joseph Creek steelhead abundance monitoring
Review: FY07-09 Solicitation Review
Approved Date: 10/23/2006
Recommendation: Fund
Comments:

Independent Scientific Review Panel Assessment

Assessment Number: 1997-030-00-ISRP-20060831
Project: 1997-030-00 - Secesh chinook & Joseph Creek steelhead abundance monitoring
Review: FY07-09 Solicitation Review
Completed Date: 8/31/2006
Final Round ISRP Date: None
Final Round ISRP Rating: Meets Scientific Review Criteria
Final Round ISRP Comment:
The response was excellent in resolving both some rough spots in the original proposal and clarifying for the ISRP our misconceptions. They clarify that the project is not nearing termination, but intend for it to provide enumeration of adult summer Chinook in the Secesh River over the long-term. They explained the pilot project the ISRP referred to, and noted it was being completed with collections in 2006. They provided a succinct summary of the challenges of enumerating adult salmon using redd counts and discussed a timeframe to establish the precision and accuracy of estimates using DIDSON technology. The sponsors also clarified the methods they use to validate estimates using DIDSON, that hatchery and natural spawners and spawner ages are determined from carcass surveys, not from the DIDSON technology. Finally they clarified the status of video counts at Lake Creek, and the relationship between monitoring Lake Creek, Secesh River, and their roles as reference streams for Snake River spring and summer Chinook abundance and productivity. The roles of Lake Creek and Secesh monitoring provide good justification for continuation of the project.
Documentation Links:

Legal Assessment (In-Lieu)

Assessment Number: 1997-030-00-INLIEU-20090521
Project Number: 1997-030-00
Review: FY07-09 Solicitation Review
Completed Date: 10/6/2006
In Lieu Rating: Problems Exist
Cost Share Rating: None
Comment: Wild adult salmon stock abundance; other entities (fishery managers) authorized required to conduct this work. Needs cost share or some other remedy.

Capital Assessment

Assessment Number: 1997-030-00-CAPITAL-20090618
Project Number: 1997-030-00
Review: FY07-09 Solicitation Review
Completed Date: 2/27/2007
Capital Rating: Does Not Qualify for Capital Funding
Capital Asset Category: None
Comment: None

Project Relationships: This project Merged To 2010-057-00 effective on 10/1/2018
Relationship Description: Project budget for project 1997-030-00 is being merged with project 2010-057-00 permanently starting in FY19. Project 1997-030-00 closed out for FY19.


Name Role Organization
Deborah Docherty (Inactive) Project Manager Bonneville Power Administration
Brenda Aguirre Bonneville Power Administration
Jason Vogel Supervisor Nez Perce Tribe
Clark Watry Interested Party Nez Perce Tribe
Dorothy Welch Supervisor Bonneville Power Administration
John Robbins Project Lead Nez Perce Tribe
Peter Cleary Technical Contact Nez Perce Tribe
Russell Scranton Project SME Bonneville Power Administration