Show new navigation
On
Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program
View Work Elements Available in FY:

Summary

<<
<
>
>>
Work Element 168: Council 3-step Process: Step 1 - Published
WE Name:
168. Council 3-step Process: Step 1 (Council Step 1)
Work Category:
Hatchery - Hatchery / Major Construction
WE Agreement Type:
Contracted
Status:
Expired
Definition:
Step 1 - conceptual planning, represented under the Program primarily by master plan development and approval. Activities necessary to coordinate Step 1, the conceptual/preliminary phase of the NPCC's 3-step process, include submitting required documents, responding to Council/ISRP questions, developing and providing additional materials, attending meetings with Council/ISRP, and making appropriate revisions, etc.
WSE Description Template:
Effective Dates:
FY2005 to FY2011
Note on Expiration:
Work Phase:
planning/design
Sort Sequence:
16.01
Focal Species Required:
Yes
RM&E Metadata Required:
No
Finite or Recurring:
Finite
Is BPA Internal:
No
Is Contracted:
Yes
Is Cost Share:
No
Is Construction:
No

For Step 1, the key products needed for a Council/BPA decision are: 1) a program master plan and 2) an initial facility layout and cost estimate. Some level of feasibility/conceptual design is normally needed to develop a layout and cost estimate. Generally the review schedule for the Step 1 process is 18 weeks. Updated submittals are required throughout the process for specific items and cost estimates for 10 Fiscal Years for planning and design (i.e. conceptual, preliminary and final), construction, operation and maintenance and monitoring and evaluation (Step 1, 2 and 3).

At the Conceptual Design Development Phase, the degree of cost variance is expected to be +/- 35 to 50 %. The conceptual phase (Step 1) can be considered largely the feasibility stage that is important in identifying all major components and elements and includes the initial attempts at laying out the components on the chosen site or proposal. Approximate structure size and layouts are presented, with rough plans and elevations, general electrical and piping layouts are identified, but with little detail. Cost estimates are general and often are based on costs from previous projects and comparable construction costs.

Projects that fall under the Council's 3-Step Review Process include artificial production programs/facilities, other major or complex construction programs, programs that address an entire watershed, or actions that substantially deviate from a subbasin plan.

The review process will include an independent scientific review of the project sponsors' answers to the review elements. Depending on the nature and status of the proposed project a combination review may occur and address all relevant review elements in one submittal.

For less complex and costly proposals, a multiple phase review (i.e., Step 1, 2 and 3) would be more appropriate. This would entail a review of a submitted document (e.g. master plan), the associated supporting information, additional reviews that would include preliminary and detailed/final designs, remaining review elements, as well as the environmental review and answers to technical questions requested during the previous reviews. Review periods for project submittals can vary depending on the circumstances and nature surrounding any specific project. Generally the review schedule for the Step 1 process is 18 weeks. Council staff will review the results of the peer review with the project proponents and make recommendations to the Council.

This work element is a planning/coordination function broken out under a discrete work category because it is a unique feature of the F&W Program and needs to be tracked separately. This work element captures the labor and materials associated with coordinating the Step 1 process only. It does not include any work associated with creating or revising any of the required documents.


Deliverable Status:
Required
Default Deliverable Desc:
Potential Deliverables:
  • Acceptance of Master Plan & General Cost Estimate; Council/BPA approval to proceed to Step 2.

  • Rule 1 (Complexity): Because these projects are complex and/or large-scale (e.g., major or capital construction), planning and coordination is a major effort resulting in the development of a master plan (174. Produce Plan) describing the overall program proposal and facility design and cost estimates, (175. Produce Design).

    Example:
    A proposal to build a new hatchery on the Klickitat River to increase Spring Chinook and Steelhead production. For this project to be accepted as a valid proposal, a Master Plan must be developed with all stakeholders and submitted through the ISRP review process. Once the draft plan has been produced, reviewed by the ISRP, and the artificial production program and facilities conceptual designs have been accepted by BPA and Council, the project may proceed to Step 2.



Milestone Title
Type
Deliverable?
Description

Hold initial kick-off meeting with all stakeholders
Suggested
No
Master plan completed (from WE #174, Produce Plan)
Suggested
No
Cost Estimate prepared (from WE #175, Produce Design and/or Specifications)
Suggested
No
Submittal package delivered to Council
Suggested
No
Council/ISRP comments received
Suggested
No
Revision/edits/additional planning work completed
Suggested
No
Revised package submitted to Council
Suggested
No
Council approves/rejects proceeding to Step 2
Suggested
No
Receive approval to proceed to Step 2
Suggested
No
Acceptance of Master Plan & General Cost Estimate; Council/BPA approval to proceed to Step 2
Required
Yes


Location Requirement Type:
Location Work Site in CBFish
Number of Locations:
1
Location Guidance:
Identify point where proposed hatchery or major construction will take place. Location point must be the same for all associated Council 3-Step Process work elements.

If an associated work element and its location are already in Pisces, click the "Link" button to synchronize locations. If not, enter a location and location description for this work element to enable future linking.

Applicability and status of the following environmental compliance requirements can be found on the Environmental Compliance tab for that work element in your SOW for all 2007 contracts forward. BPA's Environmental staff will update and maintain this information in CBFish in real time, so that you can check the status of environmental compliance on your project at any time.

Note: Many of the fields are set to auto-load in CBFish, but the settings will be reviewed by BPA's Environmental staff prior to the contract being finalized, and may be revised depending on the specific circumstances.

  • National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
    NEPA coverage for this work element will be determined by BPA's Environmental staff and could include an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Environmental Assessment (EA), Record of Decision to an existing EIS, or Categorical Exclusion.

  • Endangered Species Act (ESA)
    ESA consultation is typically not required for this work element.

  • National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)
    NHPA Section 106 consultation is typically not required for this work element.

  • Public Involvement
    Public involvement is typically not required for this work element.


Reports that Use this Work Element

This work element and its metrics are used in measures in the following reports. These PDF reports are generated dynamically, always showing you the most up to date information. Most of them also have links to download the underlying data sets to structured text or Excel format.

Stats and Overview

Number of active contracts using Work Element #168 by FY

Top 5 BPA Project Managers using this Work Element:
(by number of current contracts)
Carlos Matthew 6
Virgil Watts III 5
Patricia Smith (Inactive) 5
David Roberts (Inactive) 4
Tracy Hauser 4
Average Work Element Budget: $45,451
Average Duration: 14 months