| | | | | | | |
---|
| A | 185 | Produce CBFish Status Report | Periodic Status Reports for BPA | The Contractor shall report on the status of milestones and deliverables in Pisces. Reports shall be completed either monthly or quarterly as determined by the BPA COTR. Additionally, when indicating a deliverable milestone as COMPLETE, the contractor shall provide metrics and the final location (latitude and longitude) prior to submitting the report to the BPA COTR. | | |
| B | 165 | Produce Environmental Compliance Documentation | Provide Environmental Compliance Documentation for Work Element M | The NOAA BiOp for the Bridge Creek IMW and BLM NEPA documentation will be provided as Environmental Compliance documentation.
The Bridge Creek IMW work is shared with EcoLogical Research. South Fork Research is responsible for the riparian planting and monitoring, groundwater well monitoring, climate data stewardship, and permitting related activities while ELR is responsible for fish, geomorphological, in-stream habitat, and temperature monitoring, along with actual restoration implementation actions. SFR and ELR work together closely to coordinate the individual monitoring efforts. | | |
| C | 165 | Produce Environmental Compliance Documentation | NEPA Consultation for Bridge Creek IMW for 2014 | BLM in Prineville, OR has requested assistance from ISEMP to develop an Environmental Assessment (EA) as part of the requirements for the NEPA Consultation for Bridge Creek IMW restoration work planned in 2015. Note that this EC documentation is for future restoration work and current restoration maintenance and monitoring is covered under our current compliance documentation (covered in Work Element B of this contract).
The Bridge Creek IMW work is shared with EcoLogical Research. South Fork Research is responsible for the riparian planting and monitoring, groundwater well monitoring, climate data stewardship, and permitting related activities while ELR is responsible for fish, geomorphological, in-stream habitat, and temperature monitoring, along with actual restoration implementation actions. SFR and ELR work together closely to coordinate the individual monitoring efforts. | | |
| D | 174 | Produce Plan | Participate in RME planning process for pilot basins | The ISEMP requires planning and documentation support for all ISEMP basins to ensure goals and projects are aligned appropriately within ISEMP. This work elements provides for review time of ISEMP documents and participation in ISEMP coordination meetings. | Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) - All Populations, Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) - All Populations | |
| E | 161 | Disseminate Raw/Summary Data and Results | QA and Summary of ISEMP data | This work element provides time for centralized QA review for ISEMP datasets, including fish, habitat, climate, invertebrate, or other data. Data QA and review priorities are determined by analysis needs. | Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) - All Populations, Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) - All Populations | |
| F | 161 | Disseminate Raw/Summary Data and Results | QA and summary of Bridge Creek data | SFR will provide raw data QAQC support to Bridge Creek as needed to supplement Data Stewards. Note that it is the primary duty of Data Stewards to provide QAQC support and SFR will assist Data Stewards only when Data Steward timelines for work completion do not meet the timeline needs of ISEMP data analysts. SFR is explicitly responsible for QA/QC checks on riparian vegetation, vegetation monitoring (remote sensing summary), groundwater, discharge and climate data collected in Bridge Creek basin.
The Bridge Creek IMW work is shared with EcoLogical Research. South Fork Research is responsible for the riparian planting and monitoring, groundwater well monitoring, climate data stewardship, and permitting related activities while ELR is responsible for fish, geomorphological, in-stream habitat, and temperature monitoring, along with actual restoration implementation actions. SFR and ELR work together closely to coordinate the individual monitoring efforts. | Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) - All Populations, Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) - All Populations | |
| G | 157 | Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data | Collect field data for monitoring vegetation in Bridge Creek | Beaver dam support structures installed in 2008 and 2009 require monitoring to detect biological changes related to restoration. This work element continues monitoring of vegetation around BDS structures.
The Bridge Creek IMW work is shared with EcoLogical Research. South Fork Research is responsible for the riparian planting and monitoring, groundwater well monitoring, climate data stewardship, and permitting related activities while ELR is responsible for fish, geomorphological, in-stream habitat, and temperature monitoring, along with actual restoration implementation actions. SFR and ELR work together closely to coordinate the individual monitoring efforts. | Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Mid-Columbia River Spring ESU, Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Middle Columbia River DPS (Threatened) | |
| H | 162 | Analyze/Interpret Data | Bridge Creek analysis of climate, groundwater, and riparian planting data | Climate, groundwater, and riparian planting data are collected annually on Bridge Creek. This Work Element provides time to review, summarize and analyze Bridge Creek data to inform future monitoring.
The Bridge Creek IMW work is shared with EcoLogical Research. South Fork Research is responsible for the riparian planting and monitoring, groundwater well monitoring, climate data stewardship, and permitting related activities while ELR is responsible for fish, geomorphological, in-stream habitat, and temperature monitoring, along with actual restoration implementation actions. SFR and ELR work together closely to coordinate the individual monitoring efforts. | Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Mid-Columbia River Spring ESU, Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Middle Columbia River DPS (Threatened) | |
| I | 47 | Plant Vegetation | Plant and fence riparian stakes along Bridge Creek | Plant and fence riparian stakes along Bridge Creek as needed to supplement plantings in 2009-2011.
The Bridge Creek IMW work is shared with EcoLogical Research. South Fork Research is responsible for the riparian planting and monitoring, groundwater well monitoring, climate data stewardship, and permitting related activities while ELR is responsible for fish, geomorphological, in-stream habitat, and temperature monitoring, along with actual restoration implementation actions. SFR and ELR work together closely to coordinate the individual monitoring efforts. | Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Mid-Columbia River Spring ESU, Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Middle Columbia River DPS (Threatened) | |
| J | 161 | Disseminate Raw/Summary Data and Results | ISEMP website development and updates | 2x per year updates of the ISEMP website are needed to ensure up to date delivery of ISEMP products through the website. Continued task from 2014. | Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) - All Populations, Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) - All Populations | |
| K | 162 | Analyze/Interpret Data | Modeling and analysis of ISEMP fish data | This work element addresses ongoing modeling and analysis efforts by ISEMP. Specific objectives include the finalization of projects such as the Bioenergetics Model R package, Watershed Production Model testing, validation and refinement, and continued development work on the NREI model. | Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Mid-Columbia River Spring ESU, Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Snake River Spring/Summer ESU (Threatened), Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Lower Columbia River DPS (Threatened), Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Middle Columbia River DPS (Threatened), Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Snake River DPS (Threatened), Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Upper Columbia River DPS (Threatened) | |
| L | 161 | Disseminate Raw/Summary Data and Results | Development of GIS data for use in analytical models | Develop processing procedure for expansion of habitat data in continuous fashion along hydrology. GRTS has been proposed as one method, but using spatial autocorrelation processing methods have also been proposed and will be investigated and/or other processing procedures reviewed and tested. | Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Mid-Columbia River Spring ESU, Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Snake River Fall ESU (Threatened), Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Snake River Spring/Summer (not listed), Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Snake River Spring/Summer ESU (Threatened), Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Middle Columbia River DPS (Threatened), Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Snake River DPS (Threatened), Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Upper Columbia River DPS (Threatened) | |
| M | 183 | Produce Journal Article | Article documenting GIS tool development for habitat monitoring | ISEMP has worked closely with the Columbia River Habitat Monitoring Program (CHaMP) and this work element will guide the development of a journal article that details the lessons learned in the GIS tools developed for in-stream habitat monitoring. This article is falling under the ISEMP budget number because it will focus on the lessons learned and development of habitat collection in GIS. | Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Snake River Spring/Summer (not listed), Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Snake River Spring/Summer ESU (Threatened), Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Upper Columbia River Spring ESU (Endangered), Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Upper Columbia River Summer/Fall ESU, Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Middle Columbia River DPS (Threatened), Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Snake River DPS (Threatened), Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Upper Columbia River DPS (Threatened) | |
| N | 183 | Produce Journal Article | Article documenting riparian monitoring methods for Bridge Creek | Riparian monitoring methods in 2013 will be documented in a peer-reviewed manuscript. We currently plan to describe the classification of vegetation data using remotely collected imagery, which would allow for broad-scale monitoring of riparian vegetation data.
The Bridge Creek IMW work is shared with EcoLogical Research. South Fork Research is responsible for the riparian planting and monitoring, groundwater well monitoring, climate data stewardship, and permitting related activities while ELR is responsible for fish, geomorphological, in-stream habitat, and temperature monitoring, along with actual restoration implementation actions. SFR and ELR work together closely to coordinate the individual monitoring efforts. | Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Snake River Spring/Summer (not listed), Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Snake River Spring/Summer ESU (Threatened), Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Upper Columbia River Spring ESU (Endangered), Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Upper Columbia River Summer/Fall ESU, Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Middle Columbia River DPS (Threatened), Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Snake River DPS (Threatened), Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Upper Columbia River DPS (Threatened) | |
| O | 162 | Analyze/Interpret Data | Analysis of continuous habitat data along hydrographic networks (GIS) | This work element is paired with Work Element P. The GIS data collected in Work Element P will be analyzed to determine the best model for expansion of habitat data to areas with no direct habitat data collection. | Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Snake River Spring/Summer (not listed), Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Snake River Spring/Summer ESU (Threatened), Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Upper Columbia River Spring ESU (Endangered), Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Upper Columbia River Summer/Fall ESU, Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Middle Columbia River DPS (Threatened), Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Snake River DPS (Threatened), Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Upper Columbia River DPS (Threatened) | |
| P | 119 | Manage and Administer Projects | Manage and Administer ISEMP tasks, contracts, and subcontracts for SFR | SFR will manage and administer ISEMP tasks, contracts, and subcontracts for SFR in accordance with guidance from BPA's assigned COTR. | | |
| Q | 132 | Produce Progress (Annual) Report | Contribute ISEMP RM&E Tech. Report (Lessons Learned Report) | Since its inception in 2003, reporting for Project #2003-017 has been accomplished through reports prepared by individual contractors, an annual program-wide (project-wide) capstone report that collates the reports from each ISEMP pilot subbasin and the data management team, or through BiOp reporting. Also, in 2006 ISEMP produced the first Three-Year Review document, which provided a retrospective of the work that had occurred over the three years since ISEMP's inception through 2006. (http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/research/divisions/cbd/mathbio/isemp/documents.cfm). In 2011 BPA managers (and other entities) expressed the need to have a lessons learned synthesis report covering the entire period of the program. This synthesis report reviewed the relevant F&W Program management questions and RPAs that ISEMP was initiated to help answer.
ISEMP will update the lessons learned synthesis report for FY14 by compiling the work of all ISEMP contractors (from each of the three pilot subbasins and the umbrella group), describing ISEMP's progress in FY14 in relation to its proposed goals and objectives, and documents changes in protocols/indicators being monitored that have resulted from data collected over the course of the program. This work will be coordinated by Terraqua Inc., and depends on the collaboration and input of all ISEMP contractors.
The 2014 ISEMP Lessons Learned report will consist only of an update to progress and lessons learned that occurred between reporting points (e.g., since last released project-level report). Descriptions of progress and lessons learned will only be included in the ISEMP Lessons Learned Report if not included in the RM&E and RPA reporting. | | |
| | | | | | | |