Show new navigation
On
Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program
Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program
RSS Feed for updates to Proposal RMECAT-2002-031-00 - Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation Follow this via RSS feed. Help setting up RSS feeds?

Proposal Summary

Proposal RMECAT-2002-031-00 - Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation

View the dynamic Proposal Summary

This Proposal Summary page updates dynamically to always display the latest data from the associated project and contracts. This means changes, like updating the Project Lead or other contacts, will be immediately reflected here.

Download a snapshot PDF

To view a point-in-time PDF snapshot of this page, select one of the Download links in the Proposal History section. These PDFs are created automatically by important events like submitting your proposal or responding to the ISRP. You can also create one at any time by using the PDF button, located next to the Expand All and Collapse All buttons.


Archive Date Time Type From To By
6/30/2010 2:09 PM Status Draft <System>
Download 7/30/2010 4:49 PM Status Draft ISRP - Pending First Review <System>
10/15/2010 5:56 PM Status ISRP - Pending First Review ISRP - Pending Final Review <System>
1/19/2011 2:46 PM Status ISRP - Pending Final Review Pending Council Recommendation <System>
7/8/2011 2:03 PM Status Pending Council Recommendation Pending BPA Response <System>

This online form is dynamically updated with the most recent information. To view the content as reviewed by the ISRP and Council for this review cycle, download an archived PDF version using the Download link(s) above.

Proposal Number:
  RMECAT-2002-031-00
Proposal Status:
Pending BPA Response
Proposal Version:
Proposal Version 1
Review:
RME / AP Category Review
Portfolio:
RM&E Cat. Review - Artificial Production
Type:
Existing Project: 2002-031-00
Primary Contact:
Donald Larsen
Created:
6/30/2010 by (Not yet saved)
Proponent Organizations:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
University of Washington

Project Title:
Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation
 
Proposal Short Description:
This project assesses the proportion of precociously maturing males produced in supplementation and conservation hatcheries for Chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin. We conduct both basic and applied research to help devise rearing protocols for hatchery programs to reduce the production of these life history types, enhance smolt development, reduce domestication selection and ultimately produce fish with similar physiological, morphological and behavioral attributes as their wild cohorts.
 
Proposal Executive Summary:
Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA) 63.2 of FCRPS Biological Opinion calls for determining the effects of implementing hatchery reforms on salmon and steelhead populations and RPA 65.2 is focused on estimating Fall Chinook hatchery program effects on productivity. A major focus of current actions under Northwest Power and Conservation Council (NWPCC 2004) and Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) programs is the support of 12 supplementation programs to assist in recovery of 8 ESUs of Chinook salmon and steelhead trout listed as threatened or endangered under the ESA. A significant concern for these programs is that they release fish that are ecologically, genetically, and phenotypically similar to their wild cohorts. In response to this concern, a number of rearing guidelines for supplementation programs have been made in the Artificial Production Review and Evaluation report (APRE).

The primary goals of this project are to assesses the proportion of precociously maturing males and smolt associated physiological development of Chinook salmon produced in supplementation and conservation hatcheries in the Columbia River Basin and to conduct both basic and applied research to help devise rearing protocols to reduce unnaturally high rates of precocious male maturation and produce fish with similar physiological, morphological and life-history attributes as wild fish. Previously, we have identified the prevalence and magnitude of age-2 male maturation (minijack) in conservation and supplementation programs for Spring and Summer Chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin. In some programs, in some years, 60% of the males produced are destined to mature at age 2. In the Yakima Supplementation program the average minijack rate over 10 years is 41% which is 9 fold the rate we have estimated in wild Yakima Spring Chinook. This represents an obvious loss of production. More insidiously, the minijack phenotype also results in unnatural selection profiles on the smolts released from the hatchery and profound demographic effects on the spawning grounds, ultimately and undeniably altering the genetic structure of the natural populations that the conservation programs were designed to protect. Minijacks represent an ecological presence that may prey on and compete for food and habitat with native stocks. Finally, high minijack rates represent a significant source of error in calculations of smolt-to-adult return rates (SAR's); the central currency for survival estimates throughout the Columbia Basin. Through this ongoing project we have documented that hundreds of thousands of minijacks are released from hatchery programs each year. These are actually not smolts when released and they rarely return as adults to the spawning grounds. It is essential to quantify their presence prior to release in programs of interest and devise methods to control production of unnaturally high minijack rates. Reduction in the rate of minijack production can lead to direct increases in smolt production and reduction in domestication selection. However, there are significant challenges associated with these efforts as growth profiles that reduce early male maturation often produce small smolts. Numerous studies have shown that smolt size is highly correlated with adult survival. This project is specifically designed to reconcile the paradox presented by these conflicting principals. Key Project Personnel have conducted experiments that suggest reducing growth rates and lipid deposition in the autumn/winter of the fish’s 1st year will reduce early male maturation rates. In addition, experiments have shown that delaying ponding until March/April can eliminate high rates of age-1 male maturation.

Preliminary data suggests that yearling hatchery releases of URB fall Chinook salmon (currently a key part of supplementation programs for listed Snake River URB fall Chinook salmon) results in a high proportion of early male maturation. This represents a loss of production of full size anadromous fish and also represent a threat to the maintenance of the genetic integrity of the naturally spawning population. Documented evidence also suggests that yearling releases of URB fall Chinook salmon result in a high proportion of early maturing males in the Yakima and Umatilla Basins. Counts of age-2 upstream migrants at Three Mile Falls Dam on the Umatilla River suggest that significant minijack production was evident at the initiation of yearling fall Chinook salmon releases in the Umatilla River (Umatilla Fall Chinook HGMP). While potentially ubiquitous and common, little effort has been put forth to either enumerate or evaluate minijack production; thus, the problem is largely (and conveniently) ignored.

This project has three central objectives:
Objective 1) Improve survival and reduce fitness loss in Columbia River URB Fall Chinook salmon. We will determine rates of minijack production (through measurement of plasma 11-ketotestosterone levels) and associated physiological development including growth, whole body lipid, plasma IGF-1 (endocrine index of growth physiology) and Na+/K+-ATPase activity (enzyme indicator of smolt development) in Umatilla stock URB Fall Chinook Salmon (serving as a proxy for listed Snake River stocks) reared at Bonneville Hatchery for a production scale 2x2 factorial experiment exploring the effects of High and Low Ration and High and Low lipid diet on life-history development over four consecutive brood years (BY's 2010-2013 released 2012-2015). This study will be monitored by Don Larsen, Brian Beckman of NOAA Fisheries, Seattle and Walton Dickhoff of NOAA Fisheries and the University of Washington, Seattle in partnership with co-managers from the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW- Lance Clarke and Scott Patterson). Our monitoring effort for this work will start in FY 2011 under the final year of the previous solicitation period (FY 07-09 extended to 2010-11) and continue until spring 2015. The effectiveness of this work will be monitored through compilation of physiological profiles for each brood year and treatment group, minijack surveys conducted for each treatment at the time of release, juvenile survival and minijack migration via pit-tag interrogation in the Columbia River hydro by-pass systems and adult ladders and ultimately via adult return rates from 2014-2017. Final results and conclusions will be reported in annual and final contract reports, at scientific conferences and in peer reviewed publication(s).

Objective 2) Refine rearing protocols to reduce minijack rates and optimize smolt development in URB Fall Chinook salmon. We will conduct a laboratory scale experiment at the Northwest Fisheries Science Center (NWFSC), Seattle exploring the effects of alterations in emergence timing and growth rate (via ration manipulation) on life-history development and associated physiology in Umatilla River URB Fall Chinook gametes obtained from the Bonneville Hatchery. In FY 2011 we will complete our current laboratory scale growth study being conducted for this objective under the previous solicitation period (FY07-09 extended to 11). This newly proposed experiment will be conducted with eggs obtained from brood year 2012 adults returning to the Umatilla River and continue through final sample analysis in spring 2015. The objective will be conducted by Don Larsen and Brian Beckman of NOAA Fisheries, and Walton Dickhoff and contract staff from the University of Washington, Seattle. The effectiveness of this research will be monitored through physiological profiles compiled for each treatment group throughout the experiment and final age-1 and age-2 maturation surveys conducted during and at the end of the experiment. Final results and conclusions will be reported in annual and final contract reports, at scientific conferences and in peer reviewed publication(s).

Objective 3) Continue long-term minijack monitoring in Spring Chinook salmon from the Yakima River Supplementation Program. We will continue to collect data for our long-term monitoring effort at the Yakima River Cle Elum Supplementation and Research Facility (CESRF) documenting size, gender proportions and minijack rates and threshold size for early male maturation of the Supplemented Natural (SN) line and Hatchery Control (HH) Line of this program. The desired outcome is to document annual variation in this central demographic trait and to determine if there is continued evidence of domestication selection associated with this trait occurring between the SN and HH lines. This demographic trait is an important component of the broader M and E plan for the Yakima Supplementation program. This monitoring effort of 1200 fish is conducted in March of each year 2012-2014 using quantification of the reproductive androgen, 11-ketotestosterone in all male fish. This data is added to a long term data base being maintained for this trait and provided to the Yakima Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) managers for compiling minijack corrected and uncorrected SAR's for the program. These data are reported annually at the Yakima Basin Science and Management Conference and used for making programatic decisions regarding hatchery growth profiles. This data has and will continue to be reported in annual contract reports, other regional and national science meetings and in peer reviewed publication(s).

Purpose:
Artificial Production
Emphasis:
RM and E
Species Benefit:
Anadromous: 100.0%   Resident: 0.0%   Wildlife: 0.0%
Supports 2009 NPCC Program:
Yes
Subbasin Plan:
Fish Accords:
None
Biological Opinions:

Describe how you think your work relates to or implements regional documents including: the current Council’s 2014 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program including subbasin plans, Council's 2017 Research Plan,  NOAA’s Recovery Plans, or regional plans. In your summary, it will be helpful for you to include page numbers from those documents; optional citation format).
Project Significance to Regional Programs: View instructions
Within the past two decades there has been a major paradigm shift with regard to hatchery programs in the Columbia River Basin that is perhaps best illustrated with the following quote: “When the Northwest Power Planning Council commissioned the report (Return to the River) from its board of independent scientists, the prevailing wisdom was not that the region’s approach to salmon recovery was necessarily wrong. Rather, the failure to recover salmon was due to not having gone far enough with existing programs and that we really needed more of the same – more hatcheries and more grandiose development of fish passage….” (Williams et al. 2006). Now, the focus is on reducing or eliminating deleterious effects of hatcheries on naturally rearing fish and redesigning and adjusting hatchery programs to rear fish that are quantitatively and qualitatively similar to wild fish, not to simply rear more fish in hatcheries. Many regional programs and mandates suggest that supplementation programs should release wild-like smolts; yet, few supplementation programs do much to assess their ability to achieve this goal. Thus, research conducted under this project (Growth modulation in salmon supplementation, BPA # 200203100) is highly applicable to Columbia basinwide reform strategies as it directly assesses smolts released from salmon supplementation programs. This projects overall goals are to 1) optimize production of a natural range of adult phenotypes in conservation and supplementation hatcheries for Chinook salmon (a priority fish) in the Columbia River Basin and in turn 2) Protect the genetic integrity of naturally spawning Chinook salmon populations in the Columbia River Basin by eliminating un-natural phenotypes, selection profiles and demographic contributions of hatchery reared fish spawning in natural areas. These goals relate to and assist in the implementation objectives of several regional documents for fish and wildlife restoration in the Columbia and Snake River Basins including the Council's Draft Monitoring Evaluation Research and Reporting Plan, The Snake ,Umatilla and Yakima Subbasin Plans, and the Council 2006 Research Plan: APPLICATION TO THE COUNCIL DRAFT MONITORING EVALUATION RESEARCH AND REPORTING PLAN 3.3) Focusing Program Research, Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting 3.3.1) Management Questions (#9 of 9) Does artificial production complement resident and anadromous recovery and harvest goals within the Columbia River Basin? High Level Indicator -Council Action Fish and Wildlife Program Indicators -Implementation of artificial production recommendations supported by the Council Fish and Wildlife Program’s. -Abundance of hatchery parr/smolts released complement abundance of wild parr/smolts in-stream. This project specifically addresses critical uncertainties regarding the efficacy of artificial production for recovery of Chinook populations in the Columbia River Basin and addresses the issues associated with whether hatchery parr/smolts released complement wild fish. This projects actions operate at all 4 Criteria Tiers of the Council's MERR: 1st Tier: This project addresses critical uncertainties such as factors limiting abundance and condition of fish and wildlife and has broad application to hatchery programs throughout the basin. 2nd Tier: This project is feasible as evidenced by it's strong peer review publication record and causes no risk to biological diversity. In fact one of it's primary goals is to help maintain natural levels of biological diversity. Results can be obtained in a very rapid manner with modification of rearing regimes within one salmonid generation and produce dramatic effects on population status (i.e. reduce loss of fish due to early male maturation by as much as 30%). 3rd Tier: This research, and projects that have been a direct byproduct of it, is collaborative with other programs throughout the Columbia with work conducted in the Yakima, Wenatchee, Methow, Hood, Umatilla, Similkameen, Okanogan, Entiat, Grande Rhonde, Deschutes, Wind River basins. 4th Tier: This project has been highly productive and cost effective with nearly level funding and has operated with approximately 50% cost share from NOAA Fisheries each year. This project directly addresses both high priority biological objectives and non-prioritized biological objectives of the Council's Draft Monitoring Evaluation Research and Reporting Plan listed below. Higher Priority Biological Objective – Anadromous Fish -Within 100 years, achieve population characteristics that while fluctuating due to natural variability, represent on average full mitigation for losses of anadromous fish. -Halt declining trends in Columbia River Basin salmon and steelhead populations, especially those that originate above Bonneville Dam. Increasing total adult salmon and steelhead runs to an average of 5 million annually by 2025 in a manner that emphasizes the populations that originate above Bonneville Dam and supports tribal and non-tribal harvest. -Significantly improve the smolt-to-adult return rates (SARs) for Columbia River Basin salmon and steelhead, resulting in productivity well into the range of positive population replacement. Achieving smolt-to-adult return rates in the 2-6 percent range (minimum 2 percent; average 4 percent) for listed Snake River and upper Columbia salmon and steelhead. Council's Non-Prioritized Biological Objectives - All Fish, Wildlife, and Habitat -Manage human activities to minimize artificial selection or the loss of life history traits. Non-Prioritized – Anadromous Fish -Conduct a transportation study that targets Snake River fall Chinook, including investigation and identification of key early life history characteristics for both yearling and subyearling life histories. While this study is obviously not a transportation study, the results obtained from Objective 2 of this proposal (URB Fall Chinook Emergence/Growth Experiment) will help improve our understanding of the proximate causes of the range of life history strategies demonstrated by Fall Chinook in the Columbia and Snake River basins. Biological Indicators Are Columbia River Basin fish and wildlife abundant, diverse, productive, spatially distributed, and sustainable? Fish and Wildlife Program Indicators -Smolt-Adult return rates for ESA listed salmon and steelhead in the Columbia River Basin. Among the list of high level indicators adopted by the Council's MERR is SAR'S for listed stocks. High minijack rates among listed and non-listed stocks, as we have revealed through this ongoing project, contribute to significant error in the calculation of SAR's. Minijacks are not smolts (but are counted as such), and rarely return as adults (Pearsons et al. 2009). They represent a major error (up to 30%) in the calculation of SAR's depending on program. This project enumerates minijack rates in select stocks and aims to develop rearing regimes to mitigate for this problem. Protocols can be modified and applied throughout the basin. APPLICATION TO THE SNAKE RIVER SUBBASIN PLAN Fall Chinook salmon in the Snake River Subbasin are listed as threatened under the ESA and are a focal species for the Subbasin. Current management objectives for Lyons Ferry Hatchery are driven by the ESA and the Columbia River Fish Management Plan. These objectives are to 1) maintain genetic integrity of LFH/Snake River stock, 2) produce 900,000 yearling smolts (450,000 on-station release and 450,000 for three equal releases at Pittsburg Landing, Captain John, and Big Canyon acclimation sites above Lower Granite Dam, and 3) reduce stray hatchery fish escaping above Lower Granite Dam to maintain the genetic integrity of Snake River fall chinook. The program produces subyearlings, even though their survival is lower than for yearlings, to mimic the natural life history of Snake River fall Chinook salmon. IDFG operates artificial production programs for anadromous species in the subbasin for harvest mitigation, supplementation, and conservation. These programs conform to statewide fisheries policies and management goals identified in the 2001–2006 Fisheries Management Plan (IDFG 2001a). Hatchery and genetic management plans (HGMPs), specified in the NOAA Fisheries 2000 Federal Columbia River Power System and 1999 hatchery biological opinions 2000a,b), have been prepared for all anadromous hatchery programs in Idaho. Lyons Ferry HGMP 1.9) List of program “Performance Standards”. (From NMFS Performance Standards and Indicators for the Use of Artificial Production for Anadromous and Resident Fish Populations in the Pacific Northwest, January 17, 2001) 3.4.3 Life history characteristics of the natural population do not change as a result of this artificial production program. - Specific life history characteristics to be measured in the artificially produced population include: • Juvenile dispersal timing • Juvenile size at emigration, and emigration age composition • Adult return timing • Adult return age and sex composition • Adult size at return • Spawn timing, distribution • Juvenile rearing densities and distribution • Juvenile condition factors and survivals at several growth stages prior to final release • Adult physical characteristics (length) • Fecundity and egg size The occurrence and magnitude of returning age 2 maturing males in hatchery populations is currently not a reporting standard (although adult return age is) even though they may represent a significant portion of adults returning to the Snake River and these fish may have significant genetic and demographic effects. APPLICATION TO THE UMATILLA SUBBASIN PLAN Fall Chinook are a focal species in the Umatilla Basin, based primarily on their cultural, social, and political importance and the plan suggests “Continue to supplement the recently reintroduced fall Chinook population with a hatchery program using upriver bright stock brood returning to the Umatilla River and Priest Rapids Hatchery to provide for natural production and harvest.” Umatilla Fall Chinook HGMP 1.6) Type of program. The fall Chinook program is integrated between harvest mitigation and re-introduction of fall Chinook to the Umatilla River. 1.7) Purpose (Goal) of program. The primary goal of the Umatilla River fall Chinook program is to reintroduce fall Chinook for harvest in the Umatilla and Columbia rivers while rebuilding and maintaining adequate hatchery and natural production. 1.12) Current program performance, including estimated smolt-to-adult survival rates, adult production levels, and escapement levels. Indicate the source of these data. • Estimated smolt-to-adult survival--Master Plan goal for the program is 0.3% for the sub-yearlings and 0.75% for the yearlings. The average smolt-to-adult survival of the Umatilla yearling and subyearling program has ranged from 0.001% to 0.149% (Tables 1&2; Grant et al. 2006). A primary focus of URB fall Chinook hatchery releases in the Umatilla River is for harvest. Harvest rates are low as smolt to adult survival is low. Increased productivity from hatchery releases would help the Umatilla Hatchery meet it’s goals under the Subbasin plan. APPLICATION TO THE YAKIMA RIVER SUBBASIN PLAN A major goal within the Yakima River subbasin is the restoration of native salmonid populations to historic levels, for both ecological and cultural reasons. Along with the significant habitat improvements, this effort has employed a hatchery supplementation program for spring Chinook salmon, as spring Chinook salmon were judged to be of major ecological and cultural importance. Guidelines for assessing the success of this hatchery program were not limited to increasing the number of returning salmon, also included were objectives to limit the detrimental impact of the hatchery program on other native fishes and that hatchery production should not alter the fundamental biological character of the native spring Chinook salmon population (YSFWPB, 2004). Our project meets specific objectives and strategies outlined in Table 8 of the Yakima Subbasin Management Supplement-26: Population performance and response strategies as follows (YSFWPB, 2004): Objectives: Improve understanding of population dynamics and the negative and positive effects of artificial population management (production hatchery, supplementation programs, physical transfer of fish). Reduce competitive effects with non-native and hatchery reared fish. Implementation: 1) Continue Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) supplementation experiments and habitat restoration. 2) Monitor population productivity, abundance and life-history and habitat restoration. 3) Continue and enhance the YKFP programs for spring and fall Chinook, coho reintroduction, kelt reconditioning. Activities within our project are also called for under Appendix J of the Subbasin Plan (Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project): Objective 1.k Task: Yakima hatchery/wild spring Chinook smolt physiology studies: Determine whether significant physiological differences exist among wild, OCT and SNT Yakima spring Chinook smolts during rearing, at release. Objective 1.p Task: Yakima spring Chinook residuals/precocials studies: Monitor abundance and distribution of wild and hatchery residual and precocial spring Chinook salmon Page xx-12. APPLICATION TO THE COUNCIL'S 2006 RESEARCH PLAN IV. FOCAL RESEARCH THEMES AND CRITICAL UNCERTAINTIES (1) Hatcheries/Artificial Production Critical Uncertainties: Conventional Hatchery Production — 1. What is the cost to natural populations from competition, predation (direct and indirect), and disease caused by interactions with hatchery-origin juveniles and from harvest in fisheries targeting hatchery-origin adults? 2. To what extent can interactions between production-hatchery fish and naturally produced wild fish be reduced — for example with the goal of achieving sustainable long-term productivity and resilience of the wild component of the population by spatial or temporal partitioning of natural and artificial production at the subbasin, province, basin, and regional scale? Supplementation — 3. What is the magnitude of any demographic benefit to the production of natural-origin juveniles and adults from the natural spawning of hatchery-origin supplementation adults? 4. What are the range, magnitude, and rates of change of natural spawning fitness of integrated (supplemented) populations, and how are these related to management rules, including the proportion of hatchery fish permitted on the spawning grounds, the broodstock mining rate, and the proportion of natural origin adults in the hatchery broodstock? 5. Can the carrying capacity of freshwater habitat be accurately determined and, if so, how should this information be used to establish the goals and limitations of supplementation programs within subbasins? Minijacks are produced in great numbers from many conventional and supplementation programs. They have genetic, demographic and ecological impacts on wild stocks and decrease productivity. Thus, understanding the magnitude of this issue and ways to mitigate for it is part and parcel to answering each of these critical uncertainties outlined under Hatcheries/Artificial production of the Council's 2006 Research Plan.
In this section describe the specific problem or need your proposal addresses. Describe the background, history, and location of the problem. If this proposal is addressing new problems or needs, identify the work components addressing these and distinguish these from ongoing/past work. For projects conducting research or monitoring, identify the management questions the work intends to address and include a short scientific literature review covering the most significant previous work related to these questions. The purpose of the literature review is to place the proposed research or restoration activity in the larger context by describing work that has been done, what is known, and what remains to be known. Cite references here but fully describe them on the key project personnel page.
Problem Statement: View instructions

Absolute declines in salmon abundance, coupled with the regulatory requirements of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), have resulted in a number of efforts to enhance and restore threatened and endangered populations of Columbia River salmon.  Salmon hatcheries have been common on the Columbia River for the past century; thus, they represent a familiar response to the threat of declining stocks (Lichatowich 1999).  However, the mandates of the ESA don’t allow for the establishment of a typical hatchery program for the enhancement of a listed population.  Considerable research has shown that while conventional hatchery programs may produce significant quantities of returning adult salmon, they can also result in domestication of the cultured stock (Reisenbichler and Rubin 1999, Waples 1999, Ford 2002, Hard 1995, Goodman 2005, Berejikian and Ford 2004, Araki et al. 2007).  Domestication results in fundamental genetic and phenotypic changes in the hatchery stock, such that the hatchery fish no longer are representative of the original wild population.  Most importantly, domestication appears to reduce the fitness of hatchery stocks when they are allowed to breed and rear in the wild (NRC 1996, Williams et al. 2006, Araki et al. 2007).  Thus, new approaches to captive culture of Columbia River salmon have been devised; the most common of these is an integrated hatchery or supplementation program.  Essentially, a supplementation program is designed to provide the advantages of hatchery rearing (increased egg to smolt survival) without resulting in any domestication selection (Mobrand et al. 2005).  The importance placed on supplementation programs is illustrated by the release of 2-3 million ESA listed Chinook salmon, representing 12 populations from 2 evolutionarily significant units (ESUs, mid-Columbia River spring Chinook and Snake River spring/summer Chinook salmon) from 7 hatcheries in the Columbia River Basin (Fish Passage Center).  Supplementation programs have been embraced by agencies responsible for enhancing salmon in the Columbia River (both for listed and un-listed stocks), but the efficacy of these programs in producing fish without altering their essential wild-like genotype and phenotype (avoiding domestication) is rarely tested.  This has been a major concern of the Independent Science Review Panel (Monitoring and evaluation of supplementation projects, ISRP 2005) and they urge both caution and rigorous monitoring and experimentation of these programs. 

Numerous rearing guidelines have been proposed for supplementation programs; much of them focused on broodstock selection (using an unbiased selection of parents representative of the wild population) and avoiding selective mortality in the hatchery (Artificial Production Review and Evaluation, NWPCC, 2004).  It is important to realize that hatchery survival is routinely quite good (> 80% egg to smolt), so that mortality in the hatchery is unlikely to result in important genetic shifts in the populations.   It is equally important to realize that smolts released from hatcheries routinely experience high mortalities almost immediately, with survival to the first dam encountered on the migration pathway to the Pacific Ocean routinely less than 50% for some hatcheries (Muir et al. 2001)High mortalities can occur in hatchery fish soon after release and it is possible that this mortality is related to traits associated with hatchery rearing.  After release, differential selective pressures on hatchery smolts and wild smolts may occur, potentially resulting in domestication selection.  Thus, one of the key guidelines for supplementation programs is “Fish should be released at sizes and life- history stages similar to those of natural fish of the same species.” (APRE, Appendix A, Table A-1).  Recent research has demonstrated that different rearing conditions can easily produce fish populations with altered life-history characters (Foote et al. 1991; Mullan et al. 1992; Clarke and Blackburn 1994; Shearer and Swanson 2000; Larsen et al. 2004, 2006; Shearer et al. 2006). 

One of the most compelling examples of such alterations was documented through this ongoing BPA sponsored project, "Growth modulation in salmon supplementation", in the Yakima River spring Chinook salmon Supplementation Program of Washington State; a program considered one of the most ambitious tests of "supplementation" hatchery principles (Fast and Berg, 2001).  Our research revealed that approximately 41% (10 year avg.) of the male spring Chinook salmon released from the Cle Elum spring Chinook salmon Supplementation and Research Facility (CESRF) mature precociously as minijacks at age-2 rather than the more typical age-3 to-5 for fish from the wild Yakima River population (Larsen et. al 2004).  This previously under appreciated phenomenon was revealed by measuring plasma levels of the steroid 11-ketotestosterone (an androgen that is instrumental in stimulating spermatogenesis, Amer et al. 2001) in fish prior to release as 'putative' smolts before there are any obvious external signs of maturation (i.e. olive pigmentation, retention of parr marks, milt expression, etc.) (Larsen et al. 2004).  Furthermore, we have documented that this issue is far from unique to the Yakima program and, in fact, prevalent in most hatchery programs surveyed through this project (Table 1 and 2 in Project History) (Beckman and Larsen 2005, Larsen et al. 2010a).  Instead of migrating to the ocean for long-term rearing and growth, we have documented that many precocious males undertake a short-term migration downstream in a 'smolt-like' manner, turn around, and attempt to migrate back upstream to complete the maturation process (Beckman and Larsen 2005, Larsen et al. 2010b).  Thus, these supplementation programs have resulted in a large-scale shift in life-history pattern among the male fish they release.

What causes early male maturation?

Spring Chinook salmon naturally posses a variety of developmental trajectories, including two different strategies for early male maturation (Mullan et al. 1992) (Figure 1).  Males may mature in the autumn at age-1, during the same year that they emerged as fry.  These fish do not smolt and remain in fresh water throughout their rearing cycle and are termed “precocious male parr”.  Precocious male parr have been noted in several wild populations but they are not considered abundant (Gebhards 1960, Pearsons et al. 2009). Precocious male parr have also been described in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), may be locally abundant, and are quite capable of fertilizing eggs of full size anadromous females, even in the presence of full size males (Taggart et al. 2001, Jones and Hutchings 2001, 2002, Garant et al. 2003a).  Some spring Chinook salmon males mature at age-3.  These fish smolt in the spring as yearlings, return to fresh water after one winter in the ocean (one year earlier than the modal return of adult males), and are termed “jacks”.  Spring Chinook salmon jacks may be abundant in either wild or hatchery populations.

Fig 1

Mature male chinook salmon of age-2 (as opposed to age-1) are not common in wild populations of Columbia River spring Chinook salmon (Gebhards 1960, Pearsons et al. 2009; Larsen et al. 2010a) but may be locally abundant at hatcheries (Zimmerman et al. 2003, Larsen et al. 2004).  It is not clear whether age-2 maturing male Chinook salmon should be considered mature male parr or jacks.  To clearly differentiate age-2 mature males of hatchery origin from other male maturation strategies we refer to them as minijacks, following local hatchery tradition.  In some hatchery and laboratory studies age-2 maturation rates of > 90% have been found (Shearer et al. 2006).  Similar rates have not been reported in wild populations.  This suggests that there is a very strong environmental component to the expression of early male maturation and hatchery environments may potentiate early male maturation rates greatly in excess of that found in the wild.

Age of maturation in salmon is influenced by both genetic (Silverstein and Hershberger 1992; Hankin et al. 1993; Heath et al. 1994; Unwin et al. 1999) and environmental factors including body size, growth rate, and body lipid level (Rowe et al. 1991; Silverstein and Shimma 1994; Silverstein et al. 1997; 1998; Shearer and Swanson 2000; Shearer et al. 2006; Larsen et al. 2006).  Recent studies of spring Chinook salmon have demonstrated that male maturation for each age class is physiologically initiated in the late summer-winter period approximately 8-12 months prior to spawning the following autumn and is significantly influenced by alterations in growth and/or energy stores during this period (Silverstein et al. 1998; Shearer and Swanson, 2000; Campbell et al. 2003;Shearer et al. 2006) (Figure 2).  Even maturation at age-1 (precocious parr) appears to be initiated 8-10 months prior to spermiation suggesting that growth near the time of fry emergence significantly influences this developmental decision (Beckman et al., 2007; Larsen et al. 2007).  Furthermore, studies in Atlantic and Pacific salmon have suggested that the spring period preceding autumn spawning is a permissive period.  If spring growth and energy stores are adequate, maturation progresses in fish that have initiated the process in the previous year.  Restricted feeding during the spring will reduce, but not prevent, the incidence of precocious male maturation in Atlantic (Rowe and Thorpe 1990, Herbinger and Friars 1992) and Chinook salmon (Hopkins and Unwin, 1997).  However, low growth in the spring is not advised because it may be detrimental to the smoltification process in the immature male and female cohorts of the population (Beckman et al. 1999, 2000; Dickhoff et al. 1995, 1997).  Accordingly, the best strategy for decreasing precocious male maturation at either age-1 or age-2 is to reduce growth and thus inhibit the initiation process the year prior to spawning.

Fig 2

Most recently experiments with Chinook salmon have demonstrated another important environmental contributor to the propensity of male fish to mature: the seasonal timing of emergence (ponding). Natural emergence timing in different Columbia River Chinook salmon populations ranges from December to May, production hatcheries may pond fish (fry removed from egg incubation trays, placed in troughs or raceways and feeding initiated) from December through March.  Beckman et al. (2007) investigated the potential juvenile life history variability present in Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon. Emergence timing was varied by up to three months, after ponding growth rate was varied by feeding either High or Low ration. Percent male maturation ranged from 10 – 50% (Figure 3a).  Highly significant effects of both emergence time and ration were found with the greatest degree of maturation found in the early emerging high feed group and the lowest rate found in the late emerging low feed group.  A similar experimental design was used in an investigation of juvenile life history variability in Yakima River spring Chinook salmon. Emergence was varied by up to five months (December – May) and feeding rates were varied after ponding. Early male maturation rate ranged from 0% (late emergence low feed) to 40% (early emergence high feed). Notably, early maturation was almost entirely suppressed in the late emergence fish, regardless of feeding rate (Figure 3b).

Fig 3

Together, these experiments demonstrate 1) early male maturation may be extensively modified by environmental conditions, 2) both emergence timing and feeding rate may have important roles in modulating early maturation rate.  3) although similar trends were observed, the life-history response was not identical for the winter vesus spring run fish.  4)  these data suggest that manipulating emergence timing and growth rate may be useful tools for investigating methods to reduce early male maturation in other salmonid population/life-history types (i.e. URB Fall Chinook salmon, Summer Chinook salmon).

What about the effects of manipulations of growth on smoltification of non-maturing fish?

It is essential to keep in mind that any effort to manipulate growth and development in hatchery cultured fish has an impact on both the maturing (male) as well as non-maturing (male and female) fish.  The effects do not occur in isolation; necessitating monitoring growth and smoltification of the entire population in any growth study. Smoltification is a central developmental transition for juvenile salmonids involving morphological, physiological and behavioral changes that transfom a freshwater dwelling parr into a seawater adapted smolt.   High growth rate at the time of smolting has been correlated with enhanced development and improved SAR’s (Beckman et al 1999).  The physiological integration of growth and smoltification is due, in part, to the fact that these two developmental processes are mechanistically linked through growth hormone (GH); a pituitary factor common to all vertebrate animals (for review see Dickhoff et al 1997).  In salmonids, GH levels are secreted in response to changes in season, water temperature and nutrition.  GH, in turn, stimulates production and release of another hormone, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) from the liver that stimulates cell growth and differentiation in all vertebrate tissues (Daughaday and Rotwein, 1989).  Correspondingly, plasma IGF-I levels are positively correlated with growth rate in salmonids (Beckman and Dickhoff 1998; Beckman et al. 1998, 1999; 2000; 2003; 2004 a and b; Pierce et al 2001; Larsen et al. 2006) and have been positively correlated with SAR’s as well (Beckman et al 1999). 

GH also has a central role in smolt development (Sweeting et al 1985; Boeuf et al.1989; Prunet et al. 1989; Young et al. 1989) most notably through regulation of hypoosmoregulatory capability (seawater tolerance) via direct effects on gill Na+/K+-ATPase enzyme activity (the saltwater pump) and indirect effects mediated through IGF-I (Sakamoto et al. 1993; Madsen and Bern 1993; McCormick et al. 1995, McCormick 1996).  It is commonly held that ATPase activity provides one of the best physiological indicators of smolt development and positive correlations between ATPase activity and SAR’s have also been demonstrated in numerous studies (Zaugg 1989; Zaugg and Mahnken 1991; Ewing and Birks 1982; Beckman et al. 1999).  It should be noted that in the study conducted by Beckman et al. (1999) numerous common smolt and growth related physiological indices were examined for their relationship to SAR’s including: size, spring growth rate, condition factor (K), plasma hormone concentrations of thyroxine, cortisol and IGF-I, stress challenge, gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity, and liver glycogen.  Only spring growth, plasma IGF-I and gill ATPase were significantly correlated with SAR’s.  Taken together, in many of the salmonid growth studies conducted through this project and others conducted by our research group we monitor changes in plasma IGF-I levels and ATPase activity throughout smolting.    Changes in ATPase and IGF-I activity can then be potentially correlated with SAR’s (if sufficient #'s of adults return) to aid in isolating sources of differential survival (i.e. growth physiology, smolt development) and also assist in potential rearing modifications (i.e. pond timing, feed composition, ration) to optimize smolt quality for the production program. 

 

Why are high minijack rates a problem?

  Precocious male maturation represents a natural (and valuable) life-history strategy for wild Chinook salmon populations, but as noted above, the hatchery environment can change the proportion of fish expressing these alternate life-histories from that in the wild population.  Alterations in the normal life-history composition are undesirable in conservation hatchery programs because they may have adverse genetic, demographic and ecological effects on the supplemented stock (Myers, 1984; Garant et al. 2003b; Larsen et al. 2004; Thorpe 2004; Beckman and Larsen 2005).  The genetic impacts may occur at multiple levels: 1) Precocious males often represent the fastest growing members of the population during early development, but protocols in hatcheries typically exclude these males from their breeding programs (Quinn et al. 2004).  In the Yakima Supplementation program, for example, age-1 precocious parr are not produced despite the fact that they represent a viable component of the natural stock (Pearsons et al. 2009) while age-2 minijacks are produced at rates that are approximately 9 times that observed in the wild (Larsen et al. 2010a)  Neither of these life-history variants is used in the breeding program. Thus, this and similar programs may inadvertently be removing a significant and important allelic component of the supplemented population. 2) In the wild, the situation may be the opposite.  Studies in Atlantic salmon with single-locus DNA probes have shown that despite their small size, mature parr may fertilize as much as 40% of the eggs within a population (Taggart et al. 2001, Garant et al. 2003a).  3) Evidence from our work using the Columbia River PIT-tag data base suggests that minijacks that migrate significant distances downstream in the spring may not make it back to their native spawning grounds in the autumn due to mortality or hydrologic and/or thermal barriers to migration (Beckman and Larsen, 2005; Pearsons et al. 2009).  This may increase the stray rates among those fish that do survive to spawn wherever accessible habitat and mates can be found. 4) High numbers of precocious males may result in biasing of gender ratios in favor of females among full-size anadromous fish.  In fact, through this project we have documented female biased gender ratios of outmigrating spring Chinook salmon smolts at Prosser Dam on the lower Yakima River (Larsen et al. 2010a).  In contrast, gender ratios of parr in the hatchery are either 50:50 or biased toward males suggesting that either gender specific mortality occurs during the 200 km migration from the hatchery to Prosser Dam or that large numbers of hatchery males are maturing and not migrating from the system.  In addition, high rates of minijack production result in reductions in the number of returning anadromous adult fish for harvest and broodstock, and residualized minijacks may have potentially negative ecological impacts on wild populations and other native species with which they may compete for habitat and food.  Finally, among the list of high level indicators adopted by the Council's Monitoring Evaluation Reseach and Reporting Plan is SAR'S for listed stocks. High minijack rates among listed and non-listed stocks, as we have revealed through this ongoing project, contribute to significant error in the calculation of SAR's. Minijacks are not smolts (but are counted as such), and rarely return as adults (Pearsons et al. 2009). They represent a major error (up to 30%) in the calculation of SAR's depending on program.

We are not aware of any other program (aside from our own) that has surveyed hatchery smolts for the incidence of precociosly maturing males prior to release.  However, there are several anecdotal reports of minijack occurrence at other sites in the Columbia River Basin.  Underwood et al. (2003), in a review of the Hood River Production Program, suggests that unusually high rates of minijack production hindered meeting adult spring Chinook salmon production goals in the Hood River system, based upon counts of minijacks at Powerdale Dam on the Hood River (Olson 2003).  Bennett (1983 (cited in Howell et al. 1985, pg 97 - 100)) reports that 6,633 to 26,679 spring Chinook salmon minijacks were found migrating upstream past Willamette Falls (on the Lower Willamette River) for the years 1968 to 1980, presumably these were all hatchery fish as natural production of spring Chinook salmon in the Willamette River is quite low (Howell et al. 1985).  Milks (2003) and Zimmermann et al. (2003) both report on the return of over 1,000 minijacks in given years to fall Chinook salmon hatchery programs on the Snake and Umatilla Rivers (Lyons Ferry and Umatilla, respectively).   Overall, detailed reports and investigations of these alternate life-history types (like that proposed here) are minimal at best; a surprising finding in light of their ubiquitous presence throughout the Columbia and Snake River basins (Beckman and Larsen, 2005).

 

 The minijack phenomenon and Up-river bright Fall Chinook salmon

            Fall-run Chinook salmon within the Columbia River Basin are comprised of two major genetic groups:  tule fall Chinook salmon, generally originating from below the Dalles Dam and up-river bright fall Chinook, generally originating from above the Dalles Dam.  The two major components of the up-river bright group are the mid-Columbia (Hanford Reach) group and the Snake River group.  Natural or hatchery supplemented populations also occur in the Yakima, Umatilla and Deschutes Rivers.  Adult up-river bright fall Chinook salmon enter the Columbia river in August – September and spawn in October – November.  Juvenile up-river bright fall Chinook salmon generally smolt as under-yearlings and migrate downstream and enter the ocean over a relatively broad window (June – November).  A relatively small and variable portion of naturally-rearing fish smolt as yearlings and enter the ocean over the March – June period. 

Snake River fall Chinook salmon have been listed as endangered under the ESA and have been the focus of extensive restoration efforts including a large hatchery supplementation program.  A major component of this hatchery-rearing program involves the release of relatively large, yearling smolts.  This rearing strategy deviates from APRE guidelines and Lyons Ferry HGMP performance standards that suggest fish be released at a size and time similar to naturally-rearing fish.  Beyond technical recommendations, the extended rearing and extremely high growth rates used to rear these fish may have important biological implications.  The work reviewed above on spring Chinook salmon would suggest that this rearing strategy might promote early male maturation in these fish.  An analysis of the upstream movement of PIT-tagged, hatchery-released Snake River up-river bright fall Chinook salmon suggests that this is indeed true (Table 1).  Significant numbers of up-stream migrating minijacks were found at all Columbia River Dams in the upstream pathway of Snake River fish.  In particular in 2008, 4.5% of the PIT-tagged yearling smolts released from Lyons Ferry Hatchery were counted moving up-stream through the fish ladder at Bonneville Dam in September – October, 5 – 6 months after release.    Based on the work of Beckman and Larsen (2005), this suggests that a large portion of the males released were in fact maturing males.  No one knows what the actual proportion of minijacks at release is.  Determining that is part of  Objective #1 of this proposal.  Significant numbers of minijacks were also detected at Bonneville Dam from releases of yearling up-river bright fall Chinook salmon smolts from the Yakima River in 2008 and 2009.  In addition, evidence from the Umatilla Hatchery (Lance Clarke, ODFW) suggests a high proportion of yearling URB fall Chinook salmon released from acclimation ponds on the Umatilla River are also early maturing males .  The unnatural rearing programs developed for yearling fall Chinook salmon smolt releases appears to have a common and profound effect on adult life history:  production of an unnaturally elevated proportion of males maturing at age 2.  The demographic and genetic implications of these fish should not be ignored. 

Table 1

The necessity of an experimental proxy for Snake River URB fall Chinook salmon 

The most critical information needs with regard to early male maturation in URB fall Chinook salmon lie within the Snake River population group; however, not only are these fish listed as endangered, there is a large-scale PIT-tagging program in place that requires all hatchery produced fish.  There are no surplus Snake River URB fall Chinook salmon available for research.   Fortunately, closely related proxy stocks and hatchery programs are available.  The Umatilla Program collects adult URB fall Chinook salmon at Three Mile Dam on the Umatilla River for hatchery broodstock.  Yearling fish are released from two acclimation sites on the Umatilla River.  These fish are well suited to conduct extensive investigation of the minijack phenomenon in URB Fall Chinook salmon.

 In summary, this project assesses the proportion of precociously maturing  males and their associated physiology in supplementation and conservation hatcheries for Chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin and conducts both basic and applied research to help devise rearing protocols to reduce the production of these life history types.  Specifically, Key Project Personnel have identified the prevalence and magnitude of age-2 male maturation in conservation and supplementation programs for Spring and Summer Chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin.  In some programs, in some years, 60% of the males produced are destined to mature at age 2.  This represents an obvious loss of production.  More insidiously, the minijack phenotype also results in unnatural selection profiles on the smolts released from the hatchery and has profound demographic effects on the spawning grounds, ultimately and undeniably altering the genetic structure of the natural populations that the conservation programs were designed to protect.  Key Project Personnel have conducted experiments that suggest reducing growth rates and lipid deposition in the autumn/winter of the fish’s 1st year will reduce early male maturation rates.  In addition, experiments have shown that delaying ponding until March/April can eliminate age 1 male maturation. 

Preliminary data suggests that yearling hatchery releases of URB fall Chinook salmon (currently a key part of supplementation programs for listed Snake River URB fall Chinook salmon) results in a high proportion of early male maturation.  This represents a loss of production of full size anadromous fish and also represent a threat to the maintenance of the genetic integrity of the naturally spawning population.  Anecdotal and documented evidence also suggests that yearling releases of URB fall Chinook salmon result in a high proportion of early maturing males in the Yakima and Umatilla Basins.  Counts of age-2 upstream migrants at Three Mile Falls Dam on the Umatilla River suggest that significant minijack production was evident at the initiation of yearling fall Chinook salmon releases in the Umatilla River (Umatilla Fall Chinook HGMP).  While potentially ubiquitous and common, little effort has been put forth to either enumerate or evaluate minijack production; thus, the problem is largely (and conveniently) ignored. 

Key Project Personnel – specific relevant journal articles produced (listed here to highlight them from the general literature cited section):

Larsen, D.A., Beckman, B.R., and Cooper, K.A.  2010. Examining the conflict between smolting and precocious male maturation in Spring Chinook salmon.  Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 139: 564-578

Beckman, B.R., Gadberry, B., Parkins, P., and D.A. Larsen. 2008. The effect of Yakima River spring Chinook salmon sire life history type on emergence timing and size of progeny. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.137:1285-1291. 

Beckman, B.R., Gadberry, B., Parkins, P., Cooper, K.A., and K. Arkush.  2007.  State dependent life history plasticity in Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon:  interactions among growth and photoperiod at emergence influence smolting pattern and precocious male maturation.   Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 64:256-271.

Sharpe, C.S., Beckman, B.R., Cooper, K.A., and P.L. Hulett.  2007.  Residualism in wild and domesticated broodstock steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): growth modulation during juvenile rearing can reduce rates of residualism. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 27:1355-1368. 

Shearer, K.D., Parkins, P., Gadberry, B., Beckman, B.R., and Swanson, P.  2006.  The effects of growth rate/body size and a low lipid diet on the incidence of early sexual maturation in juvenile male spring chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha).  Aquaculture 252:545-556.

Larsen, D.A., Beckman, B.R., Strom, C., Parkins, P., Cooper, K.A., Fast, D., and Dickhoff, W.W.  2006. Growth modulation alters the incidence of early male maturation and physiological development of hatchery reared spring Chinook salmon: a comparison with wild fish. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 135:1017-1032. 

Beckman, B.R., and D.A. Larsen.  2005. Up-stream migration of PIT-tagged age 2 (minijack) Chinook salmon in the Columbia River:  behavior, abundance, distribution, and origin. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 134:1520-1541. 

Larsen, D.A., Beckman, B.R., Cooper, K.A., Barrett, D., Johnston, M., Swanson, P., and W.W. Dickhoff. 2004.  Assessment of high rates of precocious male maturation in a spring chinook salmon supplementation hatchery program. Trans Am. Fish Soc. 133:98-120.

 



What are the ultimate ecological objectives of your project?

Examples include:

Monitoring the status and trend of the spawner abundance of a salmonid population; Increasing harvest; Restoring or protecting a certain population; or Maintaining species diversity. A Project Objective should provide a biological and/or physical habitat benchmark by which results can be evaluated. Objectives should be stated in terms of desired outcomes, rather than as statements of methods and work elements (tasks). In addition, define the success criteria by which you will determine if you have met your objectives. Later, you will be asked to link these Objectives to Deliverables and Work Elements.
Objectives: View instructions
Improve survival and reduce fitness loss in Columbia River URB Fall Chinook - Hatchery Scale Experiment (OBJ-1)
Determine rates of minijack production and associated physiological development including growth, whole body lipid, plasma IGF-1 (endocrine index of growth physiology) and Na+/K+-ATPase activity (enzyme indicator of smolt development) in Umatilla stock URB Fall Chinook Salmon reared at Bonneville Hatchery for a production scale 2x2 factorial experiment exploring the effects of High and Low Ration and High and Low lipid diet on life-history development.

Develop rearing protocols to reduce minijack rates and optimize smolt development in Hatchery Chinook-Lab. scale expt. (OBJ-2)
Conduct a laboratory scale experiment at the Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle exploring the effects of alterations in emergence timing and growth rate on life-history development and associated physiology in URB Fall Chinook gametes obtained from the Bonneville Hatchery.

Long-term minijack monitoring-Yakima Spring Chinook salmon (OBJ-3)
Continue to collect data for our long-term monitoring effort in the Yakima River CESRF documenting minijack rates of the Supplemented Natural (SN) line and Hatchery Control (HH) Line of this program. The desired outcome is to document annual variation in the demographic trait and to determine if there is continued evidence of domestication selection associated with this trait occurring between the SN and HH lines. This demographic trait is an important component of the broader M and E plan for the Yakima Supplementation program.


The table content is updated frequently and thus contains more recent information than what was in the original proposal reviewed by ISRP and Council.

Summary of Budgets

To view all expenditures for all fiscal years, click "Project Exp. by FY"

To see more detailed project budget information, please visit the "Project Budget" page

Expense SOY Budget Working Budget Expenditures *
FY2019 $366,545 $359,021

BiOp FCRPS 2008 (non-Accord) $366,545 $359,021
FY2020 $356,678 $356,678 $356,919

BiOp FCRPS 2008 (non-Accord) $356,678 $356,919
FY2021 $356,678 $356,678 $354,895

BiOp FCRPS 2008 (non-Accord) $356,678 $354,895
FY2022 $356,678 $356,678 $348,425

BiOp FCRPS 2008 (non-Accord) $356,678 $348,425
FY2023 $356,678 $356,678 $357,659

BiOp FCRPS 2008 (non-Accord) $356,678 $357,659
FY2024 $372,372 $372,372 $347,129

General $372,372 $347,129
FY2025 $372,372 $372,372 $154,701

BiOp FCRPS 2008 (non-Accord) $372,372 $154,701

* Expenditures data includes accruals and are based on data through 31-Mar-2025

Actual Project Cost Share

The table content is updated frequently and thus contains more recent information than what was in the original proposal reviewed by ISRP and Council.

Current Fiscal Year — 2025   DRAFT
Cost Share Partner Total Proposed Contribution Total Confirmed Contribution
There are no project cost share contributions to show.
Previous Fiscal Years
Fiscal Year Total Contributions % of Budget
2024
2023
2022 $405,000 53%
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015 $417,553 54%
2014 $408,350 53%
2013 $386,887 52%
2012 $341,145 49%
2011 $370,586 51%
2010 $352,939 51%
2009 $378,122 53%
2008 $324,896 49%
2007 $281,722 46%
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002

Discuss your project's recent Financial performance shown above. Please explain any significant differences between your Working Budget, Contracted Amount and Expenditures. If Confirmed Cost Share Contributions are significantly different than Proposed cost share contributions, please explain.
Explanation of Recent Financial Performance: View instructions
Project 200203100 "Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation" has both recently and historically requested an appropriate budget for the work proposed with no cost overruns and no excess dollars unspent. The primary reason for this is the project typically has approximately 50% cost share with NOAA supplied funding and assistance of other tribal, state and federal interest groups. Thus, the work requires all the money we obtain from BPA and more from NOAA and others, leaving no unspent dollars.
Discuss your project's historical financial performance, going back to its inception. Include a brief recap of your project's expenditures by fiscal year. If appropriate discuss this in the context of your project's various phases.
Explanation of Financial History: View instructions
The historical financial performance of project #200203100 mirrors the recent financial performance described above. Specifically, the project has been close to level funded around $340,000 since it's inception. All dollars provided have been required and used. It is a project that is significantly supplemented with in kind spending through NOAA Fisheries base funds and specific NOAA BiOp project dollars. Collaboration with hatchery programs including the Yakima by Yakama Tribe and WDFW, Wenachee R. and Methow River via USFW service, ODFW and Nez Perce Tribe programs in NE Oregon have all donated facilities, fish, personnel and time to assist in implementing the research as well. As a result, this project has never functioned as a solely BPA funded project, but rather a significant "cost share" focused project. This is appropriate as the results from this project serve multiple interest groups throughout the Columbia River Basin. FY Budget (K) Spending (K) Cost overruns ($) Excess ($) 2002 345 345 0 0 2003 326 326 0 0 2004 339 339 0 0 2005 339 339 0 0 2006 337 337 0 0 2007 337 337 0 0 2008 337 337 0 0 2009 337 337 0 0 2010 345 currently ongoing NA NA

Annual Progress Reports
Expected (since FY2004):32
Completed:27
On time:24
Status Reports
Completed:119
On time:94
Avg Days Early:6

                Count of Contract Deliverables
Earliest Contract Subsequent Contracts Title Contractor Earliest Start Latest End Latest Status Accepted Reports Complete Green Yellow Red Total % Green and Complete Canceled
9556 17450, 27660, 32746, 37841, 42547, 46273 REL 9, 46273 REL 26, 46273 REL 46, 46273 REL 66, 46273 REL 86, 46273 REL 105, 46273 REL 118, 46273 REL 135, 46273 REL 153, 46273 REL 168, 83639 REL 13, 83639 REL 25, 83639 REL 38, 83639 REL 52, 83639 REL 63, CR-376248 2002-031-00 EXP SPRING CHINOOK GROWTH RATE MODULATION National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 06/01/2002 06/30/2026 Approved 79 243 13 0 16 272 94.12% 1
17513 27591, 33210, 37892, 42471, 46804, 53041, 57195, 61266, 65316 2002-031-00 EXP GROWTH MOD (UW) University of Washington 06/01/2004 06/30/2015 Closed 40 93 2 0 11 106 89.62% 1
BPA-10634 Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation Bonneville Power Administration 10/01/2018 09/30/2019 Active 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Totals 119 336 15 0 27 378 92.86% 2

Selected Contracted Deliverables in CBFish (2004 to present)

The contracted deliverables listed below have been selected by the proponent as demonstrative of this project's major accomplishments.

Contract WE Ref Contracted Deliverable Title Due Completed
27660 E: 157 Preliminary studies for Growth rate modulation experiment #3 9/30/2006 9/30/2006
27591 E: 157 Preliminary studies for Growth rate modulation experiment #3 9/30/2006 9/30/2006
27591 H: 162 Growth rate modulation experiments database and graphics management 2/28/2007 2/28/2007
27660 C: 157 Yakima hatchery pre-release precocious maturity screening 3/9/2007 3/9/2007
27591 C: 157 Yakima hatchery pre-release precocious maturity screening 3/9/2007 3/9/2007
27660 H: 162 Analysis of growth rate modulation experiments #2 and #3 prelim. studies 4/13/2007 4/13/2007
27660 I: 157 Leavenworth Complex monitoring 4/15/2007 4/15/2007
27591 I: 157 Leavenworth Complex monitoring 4/15/2007 4/15/2007
27591 D: 162 Plasma analysis for plasma 11-ketotestosterone 5/15/2007 5/15/2007
27591 J: 162 Leavenworth Complex hatcheries-plasma 11-KT analysis 5/18/2007 5/18/2007
27660 A: 157 Wild Yakima Chinook minijack estimate-Prosser Dam 5/31/2007 5/31/2007
27591 A: 157 Wild Yakima Chinook minijack estimate-Prosser Dam 5/31/2007 5/31/2007
27660 D: 162 Analyze precocious maturation rate of Yakima hatchery spring chinook salmon 5/31/2007 5/31/2007
27591 B: 162 Wild Yakima spring Chinook data analyses and graphics 5/31/2007 5/31/2007
32746 D: 157 Yakima hatchery pre-release precocious maturity screening 3/13/2008 3/13/2008
33210 D: 157 Yakima hatchery pre-release precocious maturity screening 3/13/2008 3/13/2008
32746 J: 157 Leavenworth Complex monitoring 4/11/2008 4/11/2008
33210 J: 157 Leavenworth Complex monitoring 4/11/2008 4/11/2008
32746 B: 157 Wild Yakima Chinook minijack estimate-Prosser Dam 5/31/2008 5/31/2008
32746 F: 157 Studies for Growth rate modulation experiment #4 5/31/2008 5/31/2008
33210 B: 157 Wild Yakima Chinook minijack estimate-Prosser Dam 5/31/2008 5/31/2008
33210 F: 157 Growth rate modulation experiment #4 5/31/2008 5/31/2008
32746 E: 162 Analyze precocious maturation rate of Yakima hatchery spring chinook salmon 5/31/2008 5/31/2008
32746 I: 162 Analysis of growth rate modulation experiments#3 prelim. and #4 5/31/2008 5/31/2008
32746 L: 183 Growth modulation peer reviewed publications 8/31/2008 8/31/2008
37892 D: 157 Yakima hatchery pre-release precocious maturity screening 3/13/2009 3/13/2009
37841 D: 157 Yakima hatchery pre-release precocious maturity screening 3/13/2009 3/13/2009
37892 J: 157 Columbia River hatchery monitoring 4/17/2009 4/17/2009
37841 J: 157 Columbia River Hatchery precocious maturation monitoring 4/17/2009 4/17/2009
42547 C: 157 Yakima hatchery pre-release precocious maturity screening 3/12/2010 3/12/2010
42471 C: 157 Yakima hatchery pre-release precocious maturity screening 3/12/2010 3/12/2010
42471 I: 157 Columbia River hatchery monitoring 4/16/2010 4/16/2010
42547 I: 157 Columbia River Hatchery precocious maturation monitoring 4/17/2010 4/17/2010
42471 D: 162 Plasma analysis for plasma 11-ketotestosterone 5/14/2010 5/14/2010
42547 B: 162 Wild Yakima precocious maturation data analysis and interpretation 5/26/2010 5/26/2010
42547 E: 157 Growth rate modulation experiments 5/27/2010 5/27/2010
42471 E: 157 Growth rate modulation experiments 5/27/2010 5/27/2010
42471 J: 162 Columbia River hatcheries-plasma 11-KT analysis 5/27/2010 5/27/2010
42471 B: 162 Wild Yakima spring Chinook data analyses and graphics 5/27/2010 5/27/2010
42547 D: 162 Analyze precocious maturation rate of Yakima hatchery spring chinook salmon 5/27/2010 5/27/2010

View full Project Summary report (lists all Contracted Deliverables and Quantitative Metrics)

Discuss your project's contracted deliverable history (from Pisces). If it has a high number of Red deliverables, please explain. Most projects will not have 100% completion of deliverables since most have at least one active ("Issued") or Pending contract. Also discuss your project's history in terms of providing timely Annual Progress Reports (aka Scientific/Technical reports) and Pisces Status Reports. If you think your contracted deliverable performance has been stellar, you can say that too.
Explanation of Performance: View instructions
The number of Red deliverables for this project is due to a few sources: 1) I'm liberal with using the Red (25) rather than Yellow (0) to describe deliverables that are delayed. Plain and simple, I use red if the deliverable date wasn't met. In retrospect if I'd known I'd be looking at a little summary table like this in the future I wouldn't have been quite this liberal with the Red. 2) Often we have had delays in getting samples processed in the lab due to reagent back orders, challenges with instruments and assays, or backlogs in samples from multiple projects. As a result, results are not available at the date anticipated as a 'best estimate'. I am honest in the status reports with these delays and list them as Red with explanations for the delay. In the end, the issues always get resolved, the assays get run in the lab and results are produced. 3) A final source of Red deliverables has been the desire of this project sponsor to focus on peer reviewed publication of results as the ultimate reporting medium. We have set forth estimates for the publication of these results. This project has produced and is in the process of producing a significant number of publications, some of which, have been impactful to the Columbia Basin Fisheries Management community and elsewhere. However, target dates for this deliverable are not always met due to delays in obtaining results, delays in the publication review process and yes, sometimes unrealistically optimistic deliverable dates. When the date isn't met, I mark these as Red. All this being said none of these delays (Red) have impacted the ultimate objectives of the project and have not affected any time critical management decisions at any level. Annual reports for this project are up to date. According to Taurus we have completed 7 Annual Progress Reports over 7 years since FY 2004 which is the correct number expected over that time period. It is unclear why the Taurus program says 11 Annual Reports are "expected" over the past 7 years.

  • Please do the following to help the ISRP and Council assess project performance:
  • List important activities and then report results.
  • List each objective and summarize accomplishments and results for each one, including the projects previous objectives. If the objectives were not met, were changed, or dropped, please explain why. For research projects, list hypotheses that have been and will be tested.
  • Whenever possible, describe results in terms of the quantifiable biological and physical habitat objectives of the Fish and Wildlife Program, i.e., benefit to fish and wildlife or to the ecosystems that sustain them. Include summary tables and graphs of key metrics showing trends. Summarize and cite (with links when available) your annual reports, peer reviewed papers, and other technical documents. If another project tracks physical habitat or biological information related to your project’s actions please summarize and expand on, as necessary, the results and evaluation conducted under that project that apply to your project, and cite that project briefly here and fully in the Relationships section below. Research or M&E projects that have existed for a significant period should, besides showing accumulated data, also present statistical analyses and conclusions based on those data. Also, summarize the project’s influence on resource management and other economic or social benefits. Expand as needed in the Adaptive Management section below. The ISRP will use this information in its Retrospective Review of prior year results. If your proposal is for continuation of work, your proposal should focus on updating this section. If yours is an umbrella project, click here for additional instructions. Clearly report the impacts of your project, what you have learned, not just what you did.
All Proposals: View instructions
  • For umbrella projects, the following information should also be included in this section:
  • a. Provide a list of project actions to date. Include background information on the recipients of funding, including organization name and mission, project cost, project title, location and short project summary, and implementation timeline.
  • b. Describe how the restoration actions were selected for implementation, the process and criteria used, and their relative rank. Were these the highest priority actions? If not, please explain why?
  • c. Describe the process to document progress toward meeting the program’s objectives in the implementation of the suite of projects to date. Describe this in terms of landscape-level improvements in limiting factors and response of the focal species.
  • d. Where are project results reported (e.g. Pisces, report repository, database)? Is progress toward program objectives tracked in a database, report, indicator, or other format? Can project data be incorporated into regional databases that may be of interest to other projects?
  • e. Who is responsible for the final reporting and data management?
  • f. Describe problems encountered, lessons learned, and any data collected, that will inform adaptive management or influence program priorities.
Umbrella Proposals: View instructions

Project History

This project #200203100 "Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation" derives it's title from the fact that growth is a central driver of life-history decisions in salmonid fishes and highlights the importance of understanding the causes and effects hatchery rearing protocols have on the quality and demographics of the fish they produce.  This project has a significant historical base in the Yakima River basin, but has broad scope and application in hatchery reform throughout the Columbia and Snake River Basins. 

History in the Yakima Basin

The Yakima Supplementation Program rears Yakima River spring Chinook salmon to supplement the natural population occurring in the river at the Cle Elum Supplementation and Research Facility (CESRF) (Fast and Berg 2001).  This extensively monitored program serves as one of the central tests of the efficacy of using "Supplementation" rearing strategies for hatchery production as well as recovery of listed stocks throughout the Columbia River Basin.  Fish rearing in this system was initiated with the collection of broodstock in 1997 (smolts first released in 1999) and continues to the present. We (Larsen, Beckman, and Dickhoff) initiated BPA funded studies (#199202200) examining growth and smolting of wild Yakima River spring Chinook salmon in 1993, prior to any hatchery activity (Larsen et al. 2003; Beckman et al. 2000).  We have monitored both hatchery and wild salmon continuously since the initiation of hatchery releases in accordance with APRE guidelines (NWPCC 2004), again supported by BPA funding.  While intimately associated with the Yakima Supplementation Project, our funding has been separate and independent as our findings have basin-wide significance with regard to hatchery rearing and supplementation programs.   Our expertise in physiology and endocrinology, coupled with our laboratory and experimental fish culture facilities, have provided us with a unique capability to assess fish in multiple hatchery programs within the basin and this ability is not solely limited to the Yakima Supplementation Program.

Initial Major Finding #1: Early detection of high minijack rates

The reproductive androgen, 11-ketotestosterone, is instrumental in initiating the maturation process in teleost fish and can be measured in fish plasma to screen a population prior to release for minijack rates (Larsen et al. 2004).  We compared the physiology and development of naturally rearing wild and hatchery-reared spring Chinook salmon in the Yakima River Basin, and found substantial differences. The most serious difference was an average 41%  (range 20-72%) incidence of early maturation of Yakima Hatchery-reared males over the past 11 years (age-2 minijacks) (Larsen et al. 2004; Larsen et al. 2010a) (Table 1).  This is approximately 9 times our estimate of early male maturation in wild spring Chinook salmon in the Yakima River (Larsen et al. 2010a).  Apparently, hatchery rearing practices promote early male maturation.  Hundreds of thousands of the early maturing hatchery males may residualize in the Yakima and/or Columbia River basins after release and cause potential negative genetic and ecological impacts (Beckman and Larsen 2005).  The ecological concerns include competition for space and food, food depletion and predation on emerging salmonids and other species.  Furthermore, early male maturation translates into as much as a 36% (depending on population and year) reduction in anadromous adult production.  Finally, the release of significant numbers of minijacks from hatchery programs seriously compromises the accuracy of smot-to-adult return estimates (SAR's) as these fish are not in fact smolts being released, but small maturing adult males that rarely return to the spawning grounds (Pearsons et al. 2010).  This major finding has historically served as an anchor point to this project and represents an important long term data monitoring objective for this research.  Starting with this major finding our research progressed through an iterative 3-step process as outlined below:

Step 1)  Study wild fish living in the Yakima River to develop a template for supplementation rearing of spring Chinook salmon (Beckman et al. 2000, previous BPA project # 199202200, Larsen et al. 2003, 2004). 

Step 2   Assess fish reared in the supplementation program according to APRE guidelines  (Document 2004-17, 30 November 2004) as they relate to size, growth rate, body proximate composition and life-history pattern. 

Step 3) Conduct controlled laboratory experiments to test what aspects of hatchery rearing have the greatest effect on hatchery produced fish conforming with APRE guidelines (wild fish template for size, growth rate, life-history composition).

Table 1

Finding #2:  The wild fish template and APRE guidelines: early male maturation and seasonal growth.

We’ve shown that seasonal growth profiles of wild and hatchery spring Chinook from the Yakima River differ and this supports the contention that high rates of autumnal growth in the hatchery environment may promote high rates of age-2 maturation. (Beckman et al. 2000, Larsen et al. 2004, Larsen et al. 2006; Table 1). Wild Yakima River fish typically show high growth in the summer and reduced growth in the fall as water temperature decreases.  In contrast, despite some variation in absolute size between brood years, Yakima hatchery fish have relatively moderate growth in the summer following later emergence and comparatively high growth in the fall.  These data demonstrated that the Yakima program was outside of APRE guidelines with regard to growth rate and life-history pattern relative to wild Yakima spring Chinook salmon.  Accordingly, these results answered one of the key uncertainties regarding Hatcheries posed by the Draft Columbia River Research Plans (NWPCC, 2005):  Yes, hatchery rearing conditions can alter life-history patterns.  Moreover, these results suggest that lowering autumn growth rates might reduce early male maturation (see Findings #4 and #5 below)

 Finding #3:  Directly compare age-2 male maturation rates of wild and hatchery Yakima River spring Chinook

The Chandler smolt by-pass facility at Prosser Dam, in the lower Yakima River, provides the best venue for selectively collecting both hatchery and wild fish during the spring smolt migration.  Despite conventional thinking that most minijacks remain in headwaters in search of spawning opportunities the following Autumn, this project documented that a significant number of minijacks migrate large distances downstream in a "smolt-like" manner before attempting to return to their natal spawing grounds (Beckman and Larsen 2005).  The physiology of this unique phenotype, which appears maladapted for either smoltification or maturation, was recently described in detail in Larsen et al. (2010b).  Because of the migratory tendency of many of the minijacks in the Yakima Program over the past 7 years this project has documented that precocious male maturation rates of the migrating Yakima hatchery stock are consistently higher than that of the migrating wild Yakima stock (by approximately 9 fold), (Figure 1) and the rate of minijack production from the Yakima CESRF is significantly correlated with the rate of hatchery minijack collection at Prosser Dam (Figure 2) (Larsen et al. 2010a).  These data further confirmed that the program was outside APRE guidelines with regard to life-history composition.

Fig 1

Fig 2

Finding #4:  Laboratory experiment I: seasonal growth and early male maturation 

Null Hypothesis:

H01: Growth rate in the first Summer-Autumn has no effect on physiological development and minijack rates of experimental Yakima hatchery spring Chinook salmon.

Based on numerous studies (Hopkins and Unwin 1997, Silverstein et al. 1997; Shearer et al. 2006) we hypothesized that the high autumn growth rate of the Yakima hatchery fish provided the energetic signal to initiate maturation in a significant proportion of the male fish.  We proposed that by altering growth rate during the critical summer-autumn period, through manipulation of feed ration, to more closely approximate growth of wild Yakima River fish, the incidence of precocious maturation could be reduced to a level more similar to that of the wild stock.  Growth modulation reduced the precocious male maturation rate by 39% among experimental treatments and 21% between CESRF production and experimental fish (Larsen et al. 2006).  However, maturation rates and whole body lipid levels of hatchery fish still differed markedly from that of their wild cohorts suggesting that more dramatic alterations of rearing regime may be required in subsequent experiments to further reduce the prevalence of this phenotype in the hatchery stock.  This experiment demonstrated the importance of the APRE guideline suggesting that growth patterns of hatchery fish match wild fish.  Because hatchery fish grow faster and have higher whole body lipid stores in the autumn than wild fish, the proportion of males maturing at age-2 in the hatchery population is much higher than that found in wild fish.  This experiment resulted in the Yakima Program initiating the first production scale growth modulation experiment aimed at reducing rates of age-2 male maturation (described in Finding #5).

Finding #5:  Production-scale hatchery experiment: seasonal growth modulation

Null Hypothesis:

H01: Growth rate in the Autumn has no effect on physiological development and minijack rates of production Yakima hatchery spring Chinook salmon.                

In response to the “best available data” from our first laboratory based study (Finding #4), the Yakima Project co-managers implemented a three year hatchery production scale growth modulation study at the CESRF aimed at reducing the rate of minijack production (brood years 2002-2004 released from 2004-2006).  Half of the production fish were grown to achieve a mid-October target weight of 15 grams (Conventional Treatment a.k.a. High Growth) and the other half grown to achieve a mid-October target weight of 10 grams (Modified Treatment a.k.a. Low Growth). It should also be noted that since BY 2002, one pair of raceways at the Clark Flat acclimation site each year contain fish that are part of a long term experiment investigating the effects of domestication vs. supplementation on survival and demographics of the Yakima population (see Pearsons et al. 2006).  Two raceways designated Hatchery x Hatchery (HH) contain fish that are part of a “domesticated” population that is uniquely marked such that at return as adults these fish are only crossed with one another.  By contrast, all other raceways at Clark Flat (4 raceways), Easton (6 raceways) and Jack Creek (6 raceways) use untagged and non-adipose fin clipped natural source spawners also referred to as Supplementation Natural (SN) fish for production broodstock.  Several parameters were monitored throughout this investigation to compare physiological responses to the two treatments.

As expected, compared to the Modified (Low) growth treatment, the Conventional (High) growth fish were significantly heavier (p<0.0001), longer (p<0.0001) and had higher condition factors (p<0.0143). Comparisons between High and Low Growth fish for other physiological parameters including the growth and development regulating hormones, thyroxine (T4) and insulin like-growth factor-I (IGF-I), and gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity (an indicator of smolt development) were presented in Larsen et al. (2005).  All of those data indicated that the Low Growth treatment had no significant detrimental effect on smolt associated physiology of those fish.  In three years of testing, the Modified (Low) growth treatment reduced the level of precociously maturing males compared with the Conventional (High) growth treatment by 33% (43 vs. 29%) in BY 2002, 52% (27 vs. 13%) in BY 2003 and 46% (16 vs. 30%) in BY 2004 (Figure 3).  However, survival data compiled by the Yakima Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) indicated that in all three years of this experiment both juvenile and adult (Figure 4) survival  was significantly lower for the Low Growth treatment compared to the High growth treatment suggesting that losses due to small smolt size outweigh losses due to precocious male maturation.  Size of fish at release has been shown to be an important factor influencing SAR’s in both hatchery fish (Bilton 1984; Martin and Wertheimer 1989; Virtanenen et al. 1991; Farmer 1994; Lundqvist et al. 1994) and wild fish (Ward and Slaney 1988; Ward et al. 1989; Henderson and Cass 1991). However, it should be noted that losses due to precocious male maturation might be very significant when compared to that of wild fish (Figure 1).  Furthermore, alterations in life-history composition of the supplemented population compared to the wild stock may increase the potential for undesirable fitness loss through domestication selection in this stock.  

In conclusion, this production scale test of modulating growth in the Yakima Spring Chinook to 1) reduce rates of age-2 male maturation and 2) improve adult survival appeared to have only succeeded with regard to the first factor.  A more appropriate test of the effect of growth modulation would have increased growth in the spring in the Low Growth treatment or a delayed release date to allow for additional growth such that size at release of the two treatments would be equivalent.  Cold water temperatures (2-6 C) at the acclimation sites in the spring prevented attaining significant growth in either group prior to the start of volitional release. Furthermore, after much discussion, the YKFP made the programmatic decision not to delay release in the spring in an attempt to increase growth rate of the Low Growth treatment.  It should be noted that Yakima Spring Chinook salmon are perhaps the healthiest, highest quality fish this research group has examined over the past 20+ years of this field of study and SAR's for this program are comparatively quite high. Thus, it is understandable why the YKFP co-managers would choose this course of action. The long term genotypic effects these high levels of minijack production may have on selection for this population remain to be seen as discussed in the Background section of this proposal and are being monitored and addressed in Objective 3 (Long-term minijack monitoring in Yakima Spring Chinook). In the current proposal, effort will be made in the rearing regime from Dec to the time of release to equalize release sizes through ration modification in order to reconcile this important confounding factor for the Umatilla Fall Chinook program.

Fig 3

Fig 4

Finding #6:  Laboratory experiment II: emergence timing, lipid level and early male maturation 

Null hypotheses:

H01: Emergence timing has no effect on physiological development and rates of age-1 and -2 early male maturation in experimental Yakima hatchery spring Chinook salmon.

H02: Dietary lipid level has no effect on physiological development and rates of age-1 and -2 early male maturation in experimental Yakima hatchery spring Chinook salmon.

The aim of our second laboratory based experiment was to further reduce the rate of age-2 male maturation by exploring the combined effect of altering dietary lipid level and fry emergence timing (Larsen et al. 2005).  As mentioned above (Finding #4) we have found that hatchery (and experimental) fish have higher lipid levels than wild fish (Larsen et al. 2006).  This is important from two perspectives.  First, it demonstrated, once again, that the supplementation program was outside of APRE guidelines for proximate body composition and second, previous work has shown that larger salmon males with higher fat levels tend to mature at an early age at a higher rate (Silverstein and Shimma 1994; Silverstein et al. 1997; 1998; Shearer and Swanson 2000; Shearer et al. 2006).

Results from this experiment provided the following conclusions (Larsen et al. 2005): 1) low growth in their first summer reduced rates of age-2 precocious male maturation in all treatment groups (range 15-19% of males).  2) In contrast with previous studies (see above) the low lipid diet had no significant effect on precocious male maturation rate.  3) Altering fry emergence timing by manipulating egg incubation temperature produced age-1 precocious parr (1-4%) for the first time in an experimental group of Yakima spring Chinook.  It is worth noting that while these rates of age-1 maturation were minimal, they were observed in fish grown to a relatively small size in their first autumn (8-9gms).  Any increase in autumn growth rate beyond the level in this experiment, coupled with the earlier emergence timing, may significantly increase the prevalence of age-1 “precocious parr”.  4) In this study we did not originally plan to produce fish of such a small size since program mangers view a parr less than 10 grams by mid-October as too small to tag.  However, this work emphasized that growth pattern had a more significant effect on determining early male maturation than whole body lipid level (at least in small fish) and demonstrated that rearing fish at a small size could result in smolts with a more “wild-like” life history composition.  5) These data once again demonstrated a conflict between the current design of the supplementation program and the ultimate APRE guideline.  Results from this study lead us to ask the question: How significant is the effect of emergence time and growth rate on both age-1 (precocious parr) and age-2 (minijack) maturation rates in Yakima hatchery spring Chinook?  This was a timely question as the Yakima hatchery program planned to move the emergence/pond date of the production stock to an earlier date to improve early spring growth in their fish for ease of tagging in the Autumn.  A laboratory scale experiment #3 (Finding #7 explored this question).

Finding #7:  Laboratory Experiment III, emergence timing, growth rate and early male maturation

Null Hypotheses:

H01: Emergence timing has no effect on incidence of age-1 and age-2 precocious male maturation rates of experimental Yakima hatchery Spring Chinook salmon.

H02: Growth rate has no effect on incidence of age-1 and age-2 precocious male maturation rates of experimental Yakima hatchery Spring Chinook salmon.

This experiment investigated the interaction between early and later emergence time and high and low growth on rates of age-1 and age-2 precocious male maturation in Yakima Spring Chinook salmon (Larsen et al. 2007).  The primary focus of this experiment was to test the limits of expression for early male maturation in this stock of fish to help make future predictions about the extent of impact manipulation of these factors might have.  Egg incubation temperatures were manipulated to induce emergence in early-January and early February of 2006, and fish from each emergence group were reared under either High (0.5% above maximum feed manufacturers recommended level) or Low (50% of manufacturers level) ration during the first year post-emergence. The four treatments (emergence/ration) in the 2x2 factorial design were Early/High, Early/Low, Late/High, and Late/Low were each reared in triplicate tanks. On the final sampling date of the experiment precocious male maturation rates ranged from 32% precocious parr and 40% minijacks (Total 72%) in the Early/High treatment to 11.4% precocious parr and 22% minijacks (Total 33%) in the Late/Low treatment. Precocious maturation rates were intermediate in the Early/Low (23%PP, 25% MJ, Total 48%) and Late/High treatments (16.6% PP, 31% MJ, Total 47%).  Growth modulation experiment #3 successfully demonstrated the significant capacity for precocious male maturation in Yakima Spring Chinook salmon. While precocious male maturation as age-2 minijacks is relatively common in the CESRF stock, maturation at age-1 has only been documented in two production fish among thousands examined since the establishment of the CESRF program.  However, when emergence time is manipulated through egg incubation temperature, as shown in the current investigation, precocious parr maturation rates (age-1) can be significant, ranging from 11 to 32%of males depending on treatment. When both precocious parr and minijacks rates are combined early male maturation ranged from 35 to 72% of males. Early emergence allows culture facilities like the CESRF to produce larger fish for tagging and larger smolts at the time of release. Our previous production scale growth modulation experiment at the CESFR reduced rates of minijack production at the expense of smolt release size. However, that study (Pearsons et al. 2006) and numerous studies in hatchery and experimental fish (Martin and Wertheimer 1989; Virtanen et al. 1991; Farmer 1994; Lundqvist et al. 1994) and wild fish (Ward and Slaney 1988; Henderson and Cass 1991) have suggested that large smolt size is advantageous for survival. Clearly, results from the current study demonstrate the limits to increasing smolt size excessively.

 Finding #8:  The extent of age-2 precocious male maturation throughout the Columbia and Snake River basins, or "How big is this issue?"

In an effort to determine the extent of minijack production throughout the Columbia and Snake River hatchery system we used information produced from (1) large-scale passive integrated transponder (PIT)-tagging programs at these hatcheries and (2) the installation of PIT tag detectors in the fish passage ladders built into dams on these rivers to investigate the occurrence, behavior, distribution, and origin of minijacks (Beckman and Larsen, 2005).  Minijacks were found in every hatchery release group of more than 7,500 PIT-tagged Chinook salmon smolts reported (2002, 13 groups; 2003, 15 groups).  Detection rates of minijacks at all dams ranged from 0.02% to 0.8% of the total smolts released for different hatchery groups (Figure 5).  While these percentages may seem modest, expansion of this rate, based on the relation between minijack estimates at Cle Elum Hatchery (before release, Larsen et al. 2004) and detections at Bonneville Dam (after release), suggests that minijack abundance in the Columbia and Snake River basins exceeds hundreds of thousands of fish.  External characteristics of maturation (olive pigmentation, deep body shape, and dark fin margins) as well as very large white gonads typical of the later stages of maturation may not be evident in these fish until mid-summer prior to autumn spawning.  These obvious external signs of early maturity are often not seen in the hatchery since most spring Chinook hatcheries release fish in March and April.  This fact may explain why, prior to the use of the new diagnostic tools employed by this project, this issue has historically received only modest attention.  These data show that the Yakima Supplementation Program is not unique.  Many programs appear to produce significant numbers of early maturing males.  We have used the basic research tools and knowledge obtained through this project to collaborate on research starting in 2009 with state and tribal co-managers in the Hood River Basin Spring Chinook salmon supplementation program where very high minijack rates have historically been documented.  Furthermore, we are also collaborating since 2008 with the Upper Columbia River Public Utility Districts (Chelan, Douglas, Grant) exploring the extent of minijack maturation in Summer Chinook stocks as well.  There is evidence of even higher rates among Fall Run Chinook in the Columbia Basin as part of the this current proposal (see Objective 1 and 2 of this proposal).  Clearly, this work has basin-wide significance.

Fig 5

Finding #9:  Assess fish reared in other Columbia basin hatcheries according to APRE guidelines.

In spring 2005 we initiated pre-release minijack surveys at Leavenworth, Entiat, and Winthrop hatcheries in the mid-Columbia River to further confirm our findings from the Yakima program and the PIT-tag database.  In subsequent years these surveys were opportunistically expanded to other spring Chinook populations at Lookingglass Hatchery in NE, Oregon and Summer Chinook populations in the Upper Columbia River (Larsen 2010a) (Table 2).  These surveys have demonstrated: 1) As documented in Beckman and Larsen (2005) minijacks are ubiquitous throughout the Columbia and Snake River basins.  2) Newer supplementation programs focused on localized broodstock that have not been in culture for several generations may be highly susceptible to high minijack rates (i.e. CESRF -41%, Imnaha - 51.7%, Lostine - 52%).  3) However, even stocks that have been in culture for over 20 generations have significant minijack rates (i.e. Leavenworth - 20%).  So, this life-history strategy is genetically retained to some degree even though these fish are not used for broodstock in any hatchery program.  4)  This issue of generations in culture and early male maturation has contributed to the decision to conduct a "Common Garden" rearing experiment described  in Finding #10.

Table 2

Finding #10:  The effect of hatchery domestication on early male maturation   

Related to the conclusions above in Finding #10, a second significant finding observed in Figure 3 concerns comparisons of minijack rates between the Supplementation Natural (SN) line and the Hatchery Control (HH) line of Yakima Spring Chinook salmon reared at the Clark Flat Acclimation site.  Minijack rates were consistently lower in the HH line under the High or Low Growth treatments used in BY 2002-2004 fish.  Statistical comparisons between the SN and HH lines were not conducted within years in 2002-2004 due to lack of replication with only one High and one Low Growth raceway each (Figure 3).  However, when minijack rates are compared with years (BY 2002-2004) serving as replicates, they were significantly lower in the HH line than the SN line under both the High and Low growth regime (Figure 6).  These data suggested that domestication selection for age of maturation may occur very rapidly; i.e. reduce rates of expression within 1 or 2 generations in culture in traditional segregated hatchery programs that continually recycle the population through the hatchery compared with integrated supplementation programs designed to return hatchery adults to the spawning grounds.  These results lead to the implementation of a "Common Garden" rearing experiment designed to explore the effect of generations in culture on the expression of early male maturation in spring Chinook salmon.

Fig 6

Null Hypothesis: 

H01: Increasing the number of generations of hatchery propagation (range 0 to 2) will have no effect on the incidence of precocious male maturation in Yakima hatchery spring Chinook salmon

The YKFP, Cle Elum Spring Chinook Salmon Supplementation Project is an integrated hatchery program (Mobrand et al. 2005) designed to test whether artificial propagation can be used to increase natural production and harvest opportunities while limiting ecological and genetic impacts.  Potential genetic risks of integrated hatchery programs have received significant attention in recent years (Hard 1995; Ford 2002; Goodman 2005; Berejikian and Ford 2004; Araki et al. 2007).  Demographic differences including reduced body size and earlier spawn timing in hatchery fish compared with wild fish have been documented in Yakima Spring Chinook salmon after a single generation of hatchery culture (Knudsen et al. 2006).  We have been monitoring the incidence of precocious male maturation at age-2 (minijacks) in the Yakima stock since the initiation of the program in 1997 and found rates ranging from 20 to 54% among males prior to release (Larsen et al. 2004, Finding #1).   While comparative estimates for wild fish are difficult to obtain, relative rates for co-migrating wild and hatchery fish captured at Prosser Dam in the spring are approximately 9 fold lower for wild fish compared to hatchery fish (Finding #3), suggesting that hatchery rearing may be influencing age of male maturation in this stock (Larsen et al. 2007).

In male salmonids the physiological decision to mature as a full sized anadromous adult (age-3-5) or a precociously mature "sneaker" parr or minijack (age 1-2) is commonly described as a conditional strategy in which variation in life-history type is under polygenic control and expression of a phenotype depends on exceeding some threshold condition (Roff 1996).  In Atlantic salmon, studies have shown that individuals whose size, growth rate or energetic condition exceeds some genetically determined threshold are more likely to mature precociously (Myers and Hutchings 1986; Aubin-Horth and Dodson 2004; Piche et al. 2008).  Piche et al. (2008) modeled the threshold graphically as a norm of reaction that expresses how the phenotypic value or a trait changes with the environment (and affects growth and energetics).  In this investigation we used this logistic approach to examine whether there is any evidence of evolutionary change in the threshold for minijack maturation as a function of size in three lines of Yakima spring Chinook with varying levels of domestication ranging from 0 to 2 generations in culture. We hypothesize that under traditional hatchery protocols (which do not use minijacks for broodstock production) there may be strong selection acting to reduce the incidence of the minijack phenotype with years in culture.  

The YKFP spring Chinook program includes a domestication monitoring effort that compares several traits of the supplemented natural (SN) population with those of a hatchery control (HH) line founded from first generation hatchery adults starting with BY 2002 (Knudsen et al. 2006).  As part of our monitoring effort we have estimated minijack rates of the SN and HH lines from brood years 2002 to 2007.  Minijack rates were lower in the HH line compared with the SN line in 4 of 6 years, equivalent in one year (BY 2005) and higher in one year (BY 2006).  These data initially suggested that while minijack rates were quite high in progeny of first generation Yakima hatchery fish, domestication selection against the minijack phenotype may be occurring relatively rapidly in the HH line.  The reversal in trend in the BY 2006 fish emphasized the need for a controlled, common garden experiment to clarify this issue.   Salmonid age of maturation is influenced by both environmental and genetic factors and the aim of this experiment was to improve our understanding of the rates at which artificial propagation in supplementation programs may influence this important life-history trait: age of male maturation.                  

Methods

 Fertilized eggs were obtained from three distinct lines of BY 2007 Yakima spring Chinook salmon: the SN line (untagged returning adults), HH line (uniquely tagged line described above), and the Supplementation Hatchery (SH) line (non-HH tagged returning adults).  Now that the Yakima Supplementation Program is rearing its third generation in culture these three lines have experienced varying degrees of hatchery influence and for some lines the exact amount is no longer known.  However, it is known that at the time of this experiment the SN line had either 0 or 1 generations in culture, the SH line had either 1 or 2 generations in culture, and the HH line had 2 generations in culture.  Thus, a potential “hatchery domestication” continuum ranging from 0 to 2 generations in culture among the lines essentially existed.  A mixture of eggs was obtained from each line depending on availability and with an emphasis on maximizing representation across multiple families as follows: SN line-2000 eggs from 80 families (25 eggs/family), SH line-approximately 4000 eggs from 45 potential families constructed from 15 females and 5 males, HH line-3100 eggs from 31 families (100 eggs/family).  The egg lots were transported to the Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, and were incubated at 5°C until emergence.  Fry were ponded (400/rep.) in quadruplicate 1m diameter circular tanks under an identical moderate growth regime for each line (Total 12 tanks). Growth was regulated by ration manipulation to achieve smolt sizes (April-May) comparable to the High (25 g) growth regimes used for production experiments conducted previously at the Cle Elum Hatchery (Larsen et al. 2006a).  Size was monitored monthly for tracking growth and adjusting rations.  The experiment was terminated after 18 months of rearing.  Minijack rates were determined by visual examination and gonadasomatic index (GSI) of maturing testes in all males in late Spring 2009.  Data were analyzed by ANOVA comparing genetic lines and via logistic regression comparing weight versus minijack proportion using the R statistical package (http://www.r-project.org/).

Growth rates and final weights were nearly identical between the HH, SH, and SN lines throughout the experiment (Figure 7). Minijack rates at the end of the experiment were very high; exceeding 50% of all males in each genetic line.  However, the HH line had a significantly lower proportion of minijacks (58.6%) than either the SH line (70.3%) and SN line (68.3%) (R2 = 0.78, p=0.003, Figure 8a).  This observation was consistent with the hypothesis that since minijacks are not used for broodstock in the HH line this life-history may be reduced in the population.  Precocious parr rates were low (<2%) for all lines but were greatest in the SH line (Figure 8b) .

Fig 7

Fig 8

More importantly, logistic regression analysis was conducted comparing the threshold norms of reaction between fish size (weight) and minijack proportion for each sampling date at the end of the experiment in May.  The reaction norm is shifted significantly to the right (higher weight) for the HH line compared with the SN and SH lines (Figure 9). The reaction norms can be used to statistically compare the inflection point at which 50% of all males are maturing as minijacks  (Piche et al. 2008).  Using tanks as replicates, a One-Way ANOVA shows that the HH line is statistically different in the threshold weight needed to achieve 50% maturity (R2 = 0.67, p=0.01, Figure 10) being approximately 37 grams for the HH line vs. 31 grams for either the SN or SH lines.  In the HH line breeding occurs in a closed loop where minijacks are not used as sires.  The SN and SH lines are natural origin stock that may have some hatchery influence and natural influence, most notable for the SN line.  Thus, these fish may be exposed to some degree of genetic input from precocious males on the spawning grounds.  Results from this study are consistent with the prediction that increases in the number of generations in hatchery culture can lower minijack rates by shifting the critical size threshold for physiological decision to mature to a larger body size.  These results are relatively striking when one considers that the threshold size for maturity as measured in May of age-2 shows a 19% change in size after only approximately 1-2 generations in culture.

Fig 9

Fig 10

From a hatchery management perspective results from this investigation support the following conclusions:

1) These data provide evidence that the Hatchery control (HH) line at the Cle Elum Hatchery is undergoing domestication selection after 1-2 generations in the size threshold for minijack maturation.

2) With regard to this important demographic trait (age of maturation), these data would suggest that an integrated hatchery strategy (SN line) may help reduce or slow the rate of selection on this and associated traits.

3) Over the long-term, segregated hatchery rearing (HH line) likely results in lower minijack rates at a larger threshold size for initiation of early male maturation.  This observation is supported by evidence from the Leavenworth hatchery on the neighboring Wenatchee River where that spring Chinook stock has been in culture for approximately 20 generations.  The average minijack rate of fish from BY's 2003-2007 is 16% at Leavenworth hatchery and 35% at Yakima Hatchery.  This represents an approximate 50% reduction in the rate of early male maturation in fish that are comparable if not larger in size at release in the spring.

 

Current Research

Our most current research has 4 areas of focus: 1) Continue to monitor minijack rates in the Yakima Program as part of a long-term Yakima M and E effort.  2) Expanded minijack monitoring of spring Chinook stocks at additional hatchery facilities in the Columbia Basin 3) a laboratory scale growth modulation experiment exploring the post maturation physiology of age-1 precocious males from the Yakima CESRF.  There is evidence to suggest that these fish survive after maturation.  This study is designed to characterize potential for smoltification and/or rematuration of these fish under variable growth regimes.  4) Complete two draft manuscripts for peer reviewed publication related to this study.  In FY 2011 we intend to complete this study and intitiate Objective 1 of the current proposal exploring URB Fall Chinook from the Umatilla Hatchery program.

 



The table content is updated frequently and thus contains more recent information than what was in the original proposal reviewed by ISRP and Council.

Review: 2018 Research Project Status Review

Council Recommendation

Assessment Number: 2002-031-00-NPCC-20210302
Project: 2002-031-00 - Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation
Review: 2018 Research Project Status Review
Approved Date: 12/20/2018
Recommendation: Implement
Comments: Recommendation: Sponsor is requested to submit an updated proposal in the Mainstem/Program Support Review, including a timeline for completing current research. Consider ISRP comments in proposal as appropriate. See programmatic issue on Fish Propagation. See programmatic issue on Information Sharing and Reporting.

Independent Scientific Review Panel Assessment

Assessment Number: 2002-031-00-ISRP-20181115
Project: 2002-031-00 - Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation
Review: 2018 Research Project Status Review
Completed Date: 11/15/2018
Final Round ISRP Date: 9/28/2018
Final Round ISRP Rating: Meets Scientific Review Criteria
Final Round ISRP Comment:

1. Objectives

The proponents found that hatcheries rearing yearling Chinook (i.e., spring, summer, and fall races) are producing substantial percentages of males that mature at age-2. In some cases, greater than 50% of the males were maturing as “minijacks.” The production of these precocious parr or minijacks reduces the production of anadromous fish, may lead to deleterious ecological and genetic interactions with native fishes, and complicates (i.e., biases) the computation of important demographic metrics such as SAR, SAS, and R/S values.

The overarching goal of this project is multi-faceted: (a) accurately determine the prevalence of minijacks in hatcheries that are releasing yearling Chinook smolts, (b) discern the environmental and genetic factors responsible for early maturation in hatchery settings, and (c) develop hatchery guidelines that can be used to reduce their occurrence. The project has developed clearly defined and measurable objectives to accomplish its overarching goal.

For example, surveys have been conducted to estimate the occurrence of minijacks in a number of the Basin’s Chinook hatcheries. These assessments occurred in both segregated and integrated hatchery programs. Common garden rearing studies were performed to determine if genetic factors were influencing early male maturation rates. Moreover, the effects of multiple environmental factors on minijack prevalence (e.g., feeding rates in the autumn/winter period, lipid content in foods, water temperatures during rearing, and feeding periodicity) were examined via carefully designed experiments.

The production of minijacks is a persistent problem faced by hatchery operators that rear and release yearling Chinook salmon. The project’s objectives directly and indirectly address several Fish Propagation uncertainties identified in the Council’s 2017 Research Plan. Consequently, the objectives of this project are relevant to the Council’s Fish and Wildlife Program. Furthermore, all the objectives and work described in the project’s narrative are time-based with clear end dates.

2. Methods

The proponents are using blood plasma 11-ketotestosrone assays to detect precocious maturation in juvenile Chinook. This assay has proven to be one of the most effective methods that can be applied to detect early maturation in male salmonids. Their annual reports, peer-reviewed papers, and presentations indicate that the project’s experimental designs and statistical approaches are appropriate. The narrative states that publications associated with this effort will be completed by 2022. However, given the key findings of this effort, we suspect the project team will continue to develop new hypotheses and conduct experiments that will directly benefit hatchery management in the Basin.

3. Results

The project is meeting its objectives, testing hypotheses, and addressing a number of Fish Propagation uncertainties contained in the Council’s 2017 Research Plan. Recent results from the project indicate that: (a) a wide range (e.g., 8 -71%) of hatchery-reared male chinook salmon mature precociously as age-2 minijacks throughout the Basin, (b) integrated hatchery stocks are frequently more susceptible than segregated stocks to early male maturation, (c) different stocks reared under identical conditions display an approximate 10-fold variation in minijack proportions (range 4.3-47% of males), (d) manipulation of ration and dietary lipid to match a “wild fish template” for growth significantly reduced minijack and jack rates in yearling Fall Chinook, and (e) a rearing design that uses a “wild fish template” for growth, through use of cold-water winter rearing acclimation facilities, increased age at maturation and improved SARs in hatchery Summer Chinook salmon.

The findings from the proponent’s common garden experiments have implications regarding broodstock transfers among facilities, most notably, when adult return numbers in one basin are inadequate to meet production goals in a given year. Transferring stocks with lower thresholds for early male maturation may result in higher than expected minijack rates in progeny from these stocks. This practice may fulfill short-term production goals but result in negative long-term consequences to the program depending on the specific stock and facility.

Results of the project have been used by managers to reduce minijack production in individual hatcheries. Additionally, the surveys for minijacks at Chinook hatcheries, controlled laboratory studies, and the proponent’s hatchery production experiments have substantially increased our understanding of the genetic and environmental factors that influence early male maturation. Idiosyncratic features at individual hatcheries (e.g., water sources, stock origins, whether hatcheries are operated as segregated or integrated programs, etc.) have all been identified as elements that can affect the incidence of early male maturation. As a result, each hatchery will need to implement a customized suite of strategies to reduce the occurrence of minijacks. There is no universal strategy. Although minimizing growth in the autumn and reducing the lipid content in feeds appear to be generally useful.

Future work is being directed toward assessing the physiological consequences of the measures used to reduce the prevalence of minijacks. Determining how shifts in diet formulations, feeding rates, water temperature, and other strategies designed to limit early maturity may affect smoltification, juvenile migration behavior, overall survival, and maturation age are also important. We encourage the project to continue its investigations into these questions.

Project results are being shared with hatchery operators and through annual reports and numerous peer-reviewed publications. Results are applicable both within and outside of the Columbia Basin.

4. 2017 Research Plan uncertainties validation

The Council’s 2017 Research Plan indicates that the project is addressing Fish Propagation uncertainties. These uncertainties coincide with those mentioned by the proponents.

Documentation Links:
Review: 2019-2021 Mainstem/Program Support

Council Recommendation

Assessment Number: 2002-031-00-NPCC-20210312
Project: 2002-031-00 - Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation
Review: 2019-2021 Mainstem/Program Support
Proposal: NPCC19-2002-031-00
Proposal State: Pending Council Recommendation
Approved Date: 8/25/2019
Recommendation: Implement
Comments: Continue implementation considering ISRP comments. Sponsor to submit to Council a report including a timeline for current and anticipated research by September 30, 2020, ahead of the 2021 Habitat and Hatchery Review. The report will also be considered by the ISRP and Council ahead of the review to assess and ensure value-added to the program- funded hatchery programs. See Programmatic issues for Hatchery-related work and for Research projects.

[Background: See https:/www.nwcouncil.org/fish-and-wildlife/fish-and-wildlife-program/project-reviews-and-recommendations/mainstem-review]

Independent Scientific Review Panel Assessment

Assessment Number: 2002-031-00-ISRP-20190404
Project: 2002-031-00 - Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation
Review: 2019-2021 Mainstem/Program Support
Proposal Number: NPCC19-2002-031-00
Completed Date: None
First Round ISRP Date: 4/4/2019
First Round ISRP Rating: Meets Scientific Review Criteria
First Round ISRP Comment:

Comment:

This is a highly relevant and practical research project that addresses key uncertainties involving survival and maturation rates of hatchery Chinook salmon and the potential effects of hatchery supplementation on natural and hatchery production. Results from this project may be used to help develop hatchery rearing regimes that minimize early male maturation rates and improve hatchery smolt-to-adult survival rates (SARs) while minimizing negative impacts to protected natural stocks, including resident fishes. The project has important implications for implementation of segregated versus integrated hatcheries, as the latter approach tends to produce earlier maturing minijacks. Based on the findings of this project, all Chinook salmon hatcheries in the Columbia Basin should test for and estimate the production of minijacks.

1. Objectives, Significance to Regional Programs, and Technical Background

Objectives are clearly stated and quantitative with implied time limits (one generation). The biological objectives have important implications for hatchery supplementation and management, including outcomes from segregated versus integrated hatcheries. The unintentional production of precocious salmon ("minijacks") reduces the production of anadromous fish (i.e., large fish that are harvested in fisheries), may lead to deleterious ecological and genetic interactions with native fishes, and complicates (i.e., biases) the calculation of important demographic metrics such as SAR, SAS, and R/S values. The anticipated outcomes are expressed quantitatively as hypotheses to be tested. Timelines for achievement are approximately 5 years (to obtain results over one full generation).

2. Results and Adaptive Management

Some objectives have already been achieved in that hypotheses have been tested at the laboratory scale, and multiple studies have been published in journals. The project is on track to assess the feasibility and potential benefits from implementation of its findings at a larger hatchery-level scale.

The project has evolved from surveys to accurately determine the prevalence of minijacks in hatchery releases of yearling Chinook smolts, to experiments to identify the environmental and genetic factors responsible for early maturation in hatchery settings, to efforts to develop hatchery guidelines that can be used to reduce minijack production in a variety of different settings. One of the most important and unexpected finding is that integrated hatcheries tend to produce more minijacks than segregated hatcheries because segregated hatcheries select against the use of minijacks in the broodstock. We expect the project team will continue to develop new hypotheses and conduct experiments that will provide direct benefits for hatchery management throughout the Basin.

3. Methods: Project Relationships, Work Types, and Deliverables

The numerous peer-reviewed publications indicate that the project includes appropriate experimental designs, methodology, and statistical methods. The proposal provides a good overview of the hypotheses tested, methods, findings, and relationships to key Fish and Wildlife Program issues throughout the Basin.

Documentation Links:
Review: RME / AP Category Review

Council Recommendation

Assessment Number: 2002-031-00-NPCC-20101108
Project: 2002-031-00 - Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation
Review: RME / AP Category Review
Proposal: RMECAT-2002-031-00
Proposal State: Pending BPA Response
Approved Date: 6/10/2011
Recommendation: Fund (Qualified)
Comments: Implement through FY 2013. Implementation beyond FY 2013 based on ISRP and Council review of the results report and/or outcome of a regional hatchery effects evaluation process.
Conditions:
Council Condition #1 Programmatic Issue: RMECAT #4 Hatchery Effectiveness—.
Council Condition #2 Programmatic Issue: RMECAT #4 Hatchery Effectiveness—.

Independent Scientific Review Panel Assessment

Assessment Number: 2002-031-00-ISRP-20101015
Project: 2002-031-00 - Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation
Review: RME / AP Category Review
Proposal Number: RMECAT-2002-031-00
Completed Date: 12/17/2010
Final Round ISRP Date: 12/17/2010
Final Round ISRP Rating: Meets Scientific Review Criteria
Final Round ISRP Comment:
The project is providing a major benefit to fish and wildlife simply by bringing the high frequency of minijack age 2 maturing males to light. It is a result of fish culture practice that not only biases SAR estimation but also is probably a source of domestication selection. The project scientists are well positioned to understand the problem physiologically and to evaluate fish-culture practices.

1. Purpose, Significance to Regional Programs, Technical Background, and Objectives

There are very compelling ties to regional programs and to the Council’s Fish and Wildlife Program – the proponents have identified a major problem with Chinook supplementation and offer the prospect of adaptive change of practices:

Objective 1) Improve survival and reduce fitness loss in Columbia River URB Fall Chinook salmon.

Objective 2) Refine rearing protocols to reduce minijack rates and optimize smolt development in URB Fall Chinook salmon.

Objective 3) Continue long-term minijack monitoring in Spring Chinook salmon from the Yakima River Supplementation Program.


2. History: Accomplishments, Results, and Adaptive Management

The project scientists are an experienced team with a strong record of publishing results. They have demonstrated an insidious problem and clearly describe past and future adaptive changes to fish culture practices that have occurred or will occur as a result of this research.

3. Project Relationships, Emerging Limiting Factors, and Tailored Questions for Type of Work (Hatchery, RME, Tagging)

The proposal explains how the research will affect other activities in the region, as well as serve as a model for other regions. The proponents also broach the subject of climate change and how that may contribute to the minijack problem in this and other systems.

4. Deliverables, Work Elements, Metrics, and Methods

The proposal does a great job of describing deliverables (as well as reviewing their past progress and difficulties in meeting past deliverable due dates). That candor is refreshing! The level of detail explaining methodology (both experimental and analytical) was outstanding
First Round ISRP Date: 10/18/2010
First Round ISRP Rating: Meets Scientific Review Criteria
First Round ISRP Comment:

The project is providing a major benefit to fish and wildlife simply by bringing the high frequency of minijack age 2 maturing males to light. It is a result of fish culture practice that not only biases SAR estimation but also is probably a source of domestication selection. The project scientists are well positioned to understand the problem physiologically and to evaluate fish-culture practices. 1. Purpose, Significance to Regional Programs, Technical Background, and Objectives There are very compelling ties to regional programs and to the Council’s Fish and Wildlife Program – the proponents have identified a major problem with Chinook supplementation and offer the prospect of adaptive change of practices: Objective 1) Improve survival and reduce fitness loss in Columbia River URB Fall Chinook salmon. Objective 2) Refine rearing protocols to reduce minijack rates and optimize smolt development in URB Fall Chinook salmon. Objective 3) Continue long-term minijack monitoring in Spring Chinook salmon from the Yakima River Supplementation Program. 2. History: Accomplishments, Results, and Adaptive Management The project scientists are an experienced team with a strong record of publishing results. They have demonstrated an insidious problem and clearly describe past and future adaptive changes to fish culture practices that have occurred or will occur as a result of this research. 3. Project Relationships, Emerging Limiting Factors, and Tailored Questions for Type of Work (Hatchery, RME, Tagging) The proposal explains how the research will affect other activities in the region, as well as serve as a model for other regions. The proponents also broach the subject of climate change and how that may contribute to the minijack problem in this and other systems. 4. Deliverables, Work Elements, Metrics, and Methods The proposal does a great job of describing deliverables (as well as reviewing their past progress and difficulties in meeting past deliverable due dates). That candor is refreshing! The level of detail explaining methodology (both experimental and analytical) was outstanding

Documentation Links:
Review: FY07-09 Solicitation Review

Council Recommendation

Assessment Number: 2002-031-00-NPCC-20090924
Project: 2002-031-00 - Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation
Review: FY07-09 Solicitation Review
Approved Date: 10/23/2006
Recommendation: Fund
Comments:

Independent Scientific Review Panel Assessment

Assessment Number: 2002-031-00-ISRP-20060831
Project: 2002-031-00 - Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation
Review: FY07-09 Solicitation Review
Completed Date: 8/31/2006
Final Round ISRP Date: None
Final Round ISRP Rating: Meets Scientific Review Criteria (Qualified)
Final Round ISRP Comment:
This is an excellent proposal, but this project may be nearing the point of toning down the actual collection of more research data and instead developing recommendations for protocol development and implementation of existing findings. Along these lines, the work element to look at rearing practices should be emphasized.

The results of this study have broad applicability.

Technical and scientific background: The technical and scientific background for this proposal is outstanding. It gives the reader an excellent basis to understand the rest of the proposal -- not only what is proposed, but why as well.

Rationale and significance to subbasin plans and regional programs: This proposal is clearly associated with reforms to artificial production in the basin, as evidenced by this quote: "Now, the focus is on reducing or eliminating deleterious effects of hatcheries on naturally rearing fish and redesigning and adjusting hatchery programs to rear fish that are qualitatively and qualitatively similar to wild fish, not to simply rear more fish in hatcheries."

Relationships to other projects: The proposal provides excellent detail in regards to specific projects, particularly to hatchery-rearing practices throughout the basin.

Project history: The proposal includes an excellent summary of the project history over the past five years, including listing important findings with excellent and informative figures. This is an interesting project at both the academic and practical levels.

Objectives: Although the specific objectives are well defined by tasks, an overarching objective of improving our understanding of the influences of artificial culture on the life history trajectories of salmon would be appropriate.

Tasks (work elements) and methods: Methods are extremely well explained, including nice conceptual diagrams.

Monitoring and evaluation: Evaluation has been provided in the past, and will likely continue in the future, to provide important insights into altering artificial production to make it compatible with populations of natural salmon.

Facilities, equipment, and personnel: Facilities have already been shown to be more than adequate.

Information transfer: Publication record is excellent, that is likely best outlet, although direct input into other programs would be good.

Benefits to focal and non-focal species: The project should provide benefits to both natural and hatchery populations of the focal species. There should be no adverse effect beyond interactions during data collections.
Documentation Links:
Explain how your project has responded to the above ISRP and Council qualifications, conditions, or recommendations. This is especially important if your project received a "Qualified" rating from the ISRP in your most recent assessment. Even if your project received favorable ratings from both the ISRP and Council, please respond to any issues they may have raised.
Response to past ISRP and Council comments and recommendations: View instructions
In the FY07-09 Solicitation Review this project #200203100 &quot;Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation received a Qualified rating from the ISRP. The proposal was described as excellent, the studies have broad applicability, relationships to other projects are significant, Tasks, facilities and publication record were all reviewed positively. The only point worth improving according to the ISRP concerned the note that specific objectives were well defined by tasks, but an overarching objective of improving our understanding of the influences of artificial culture on the life history trajectories of salmon would be appropriate. In response to that we have tried to demonstrate through our publication record over the past 4 years and the introduction to this current proposal that our overall objective is to illuminate this issue of the major effects hatchery culture techniques can have on life-history composition of salmonid populations and attempt to develop rearing techniques to help mitigate for those effects.<br/> <br/> In the FY07-09 Solicitation Review for this project by the NWPCC the recommendation simply stated Fund with no additional comments.


Project Level: Please discuss how you’ve changed your project (objectives, actions, etc) based on biological responses or information gained from project actions; because of management decisions at the subbasin state, regional, or agency level; or by external or larger environment factors. Specifically, regarding project modifications summarize how previous hypotheses and methods are changed or improved in this updated proposal. This would include project modifications based on information from recent research and literature. How is your new work different than previous work, and why?
Management Level: Please describe any management changes planned or made because of biological responses or information gained from project actions. This would include management decisions at the subbasin, state, or regional level influenced by project results.
Management Changes: View instructions
I.) The earliest, most significant management change connected with this project was conducted in the Yakima River Basin. In response to the “best available data” from our first laboratory based study (Finding #4 in the Project History), the Yakima Project co-managers implemented a three year hatchery production scale growth modulation study at the CESRF aimed at reducing the rate of minijack production (brood years 2002-2004 released from 2004-2006). Half of the production fish were grown to achieve a mid-October target weight of 15 grams (Conventional Treatment a.k.a. High Growth) and the other half grown to achieve a mid-October target weight of 10 grams (Modified Treatment a.k.a. Low Growth). All data indicated that the Low Growth treatment had no significant detrimental effect on smolt associated physiology of those fish. In three years of testing, the Modified (Low) growth treatment reduced the level of precociously maturing males compared with the Conventional (High) growth treatment by 33% (43 vs. 29%) in BY 2002, 52% (27 vs. 13%) in BY 2003 and 46% (30 vs. 16%) in BY 2004. However, survival data compiled by the Yakima Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) indicated that in all three years of this experiment both juvenile and adult survival was significantly lower for the Low Growth treatment compared to the High growth treatment suggesting that losses due to small smolt size outweigh losses due to precocious male maturation. However, it should be noted that losses due to precocious male maturation might be very significant when compared to that of wild fish. Furthermore, alterations in life-history composition of the supplemented population compared to the wild stock may increase the potential for undesirable domestication selection in this stock. In conclusion, this production scale test of modulating growth in the Yakima Spring Chinook to 1) reduce rates of age-2 male maturation and 2) improve adult survival appeared to have only succeeded with regard to the first factor. A more appropriate test of the effect of growth modulation would have increased growth in the spring in the Low Growth treatment or a delayed release date to allow for additional growth such that size at release of the two treatments would be equivalent. Cold water temperatures (2-6 C) at the acclimation sites in the spring prevented attaining significant growth in either group prior to the start of volitional release. Furthermore, after much discussion, the YKFP made the programmatic decision not to delay release in the spring in an attempt to increase growth rate of the Low Growth treatment. It should be noted that Yakima Spring Chinook salmon are perhaps the healthiest, highest quality fish this research group has examined over the past 20+ years of this field of study and SAR's for this program are comparatively quite high. Thus, it is understandable why the YKFP co-managers would choose this course of action. The long term genotypic effects these high levels of minijack production may have on selection for this population remain to be seen as discussed in the Background section of this proposal and are being monitored and addressed in Objective 3 (Long-term minijack monitoring in Yakima Spring Chinook. Future studies aimed at maintaining larger smolt size while decreasing unnatural rates of precocious male maturation are warranted and are being proposed for the Umatilla Fall Chinook program in this current proposal. II.) Results from the project have gained widespread interest throughout the Columbia River Basin beyond the Yakima River. We are currently collaborating with the CTWS and ODFW monitoring minijack rates and smolt quality in production fish reared for the Hood River spring Chinook salmon production monitoring and evaluation project # 1988-053-03. This program has historically produced significant numbers of minijacks, however the exact proportion of the release is not known. Results from this study will be used to determine true minijack rates of fish produced at each of 3 facilities (Carson, Round Butte, Parkdale) and the result will be used refine and optimize the rearing regime used for that program in the future at one of these facilities. III.) Our expertise and research methods are being used to monitor life-history composition and smolt quality for a Chelan County PUD funded project exploring the efficacy of partial water reuse technology for use in rearing Summer Chinook stocks in the upper Columbia River basin. IV.) Both Larsen and Beckman are collaborators on #1993-056-00 Advancements in hatchery reform Research. Technology and expertise developed by this project is being applied to examine the efficacy of rearing Steelhead salmon under S1 versus S2 regimes in supplementation programs to reduce residualism and improve smolt quality. V.) Our past publications and results precipitated contact from Lance Clarke, Fisheries Biologist, ODFW regarding collaborative assistance with resolving issues associated with high minijack rates in the Umatilla Fall Chinook program that is a major component of this current research proposal. The production experiment proposed by ODFW and CTUIR for the Umatilla URB stock exploring the effects of High and Low lipid diet and High and Low growth are a direct byproduct of our BPA research for this project and the publications related to that research.

The table content is updated frequently and thus contains more recent information than what was in the original proposal reviewed by ISRP and Council.

Public Attachments in CBFish

ID Title Type Period Contract Uploaded
00009556-1 Assessment of High Rates of Precocious Male Maturation in a Spring Chinook Salmon Supplementation Ha Progress (Annual) Report 10/2001 - 09/2003 9556 8/1/2003 12:00:00 AM
00017450-1 Growth Rate Modulation in Spring Chinook Salmon Supplementation Progress (Annual) Report 10/2002 - 09/2004 17513 12/1/2004 12:00:00 AM
00017450-2 Growth Rate Modulation in Spring Chinook Salmon Supplementation Progress (Annual) Report 06/2004 - 05/2005 17513 4/1/2006 12:00:00 AM
P102694 Growth Rate Modulation in Spring Chinook Salmon Progress (Annual) Report 06/2005 - 05/2006 32746 7/3/2007 9:53:28 AM
P104644 Growth rate modulation in Spring Chinook salmon supplementation. Progress (Annual) Report 06/2006 - 05/2007 32746 11/27/2007 2:05:20 PM
P108584 Growth Modulation in Chinook Salmon Supplementation Progress (Annual) Report 06/2007 - 05/2008 37841 10/8/2008 2:33:57 PM
P116889 Growth Rate Modulation in Spring Chinook Salmon Supplementation Progress (Annual) Report 06/2008 - 05/2009 42547 6/29/2010 5:43:38 PM
P121529 Growth Rate Modulation in Spring Chinook Salmon Supplementation Progress (Annual) Report 06/2009 - 05/2010 6/8/2011 12:36:56 PM
P126773 Growth Rate Modulation in Spring Chinook Salmon Supplementation; 6/10 - 5/11 Progress (Annual) Report 06/2010 - 05/2011 46273 REL 26 5/31/2012 2:15:57 PM
P132189 RM&E Annual Report 2002-031-00 (1Jun 2011 through 31 Dec 2012 Progress (Annual) Report 06/2011 - 12/2012 46273 REL 46 5/31/2013 3:21:39 PM
P136916 FY 2013 RMR Annual Report Project 2002-031-00 Progress (Annual) Report 01/2013 - 12/2013 46273 REL 66 6/4/2014 10:57:29 AM
P137622 RME Technical Report 2002-031-00 Progress (Annual) Report 06/2011 - 12/2012 46273 REL 66 7/23/2014 9:10:48 AM
P142390 Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation; 1/14 - 12/14 Progress (Annual) Report 01/2014 - 12/2014 46273 REL 86 2/23/2015 2:03:54 PM
P147427 Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation; 1/15 - 12/15 Progress (Annual) Report 01/2015 - 12/2015 46273 REL 105 2/18/2016 9:31:26 AM
P153914 Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation; 1/16 - 12/16 Progress (Annual) Report 01/2016 - 12/2016 46273 REL 118 4/3/2017 10:51:50 AM
P159554 Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation; 1/17 - 12/17 Progress (Annual) Report 01/2017 - 12/2017 46273 REL 135 3/5/2018 2:44:55 PM
P163602 Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation; 1/18 - 12/18 Progress (Annual) Report 01/2018 - 12/2018 46273 REL 153 1/17/2019 3:09:24 PM
P170639 Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation; 1/19 - 12/19 Progress (Annual) Report 01/2019 - 12/2019 46273 REL 168 2/3/2020 3:46:47 PM
P175353 Growth Rate Modulation in Spring Chinook Salmon Supplementation Photo - 5/7/2020 5:44:05 PM
P182121 FY2020 RME Annual Report 2002-031-00 1/1/20-12/31/20 Progress (Annual) Report 01/2020 - 12/2020 83639 REL 13 2/12/2021 3:56:06 PM
P190326 FY 2021 RME Annual Report Project 2002-031-00 Progress (Annual) Report 01/2021 - 12/2021 83639 REL 25 2/16/2022 1:44:52 PM
P197832 FY 2022 RME Annual Report 2002-031-00 Progress (Annual) Report 01/2022 - 12/2022 83639 REL 38 2/28/2023 4:03:40 PM
P207968 Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation FY 2023 Annual Report (Final) Progress (Annual) Report 01/2023 - 12/2023 83639 REL 52 3/19/2024 12:54:34 PM
P216880 FY 2024 RME Annual Report 2002-031-00 Progress (Annual) Report 01/2024 - 12/2024 83639 REL 63 4/3/2025 1:35:36 PM

Other Project Documents on the Web

None


The Project Relationships tracked automatically in CBFish provide a history of how work and budgets move between projects. The terms "Merged" and "Split" describe the transfer of some or all of the Work and budgets from one or more source projects to one or more target projects. For example, some of one project's budget may be split from it and merged into a different project. Project relationships change for a variety of reasons including the creation of efficiency gains.
Project Relationships: None

Additional Relationships Explanation:

1.  Research conducted under this  ongoing BPA project #200203100, “Growth modulation in salmon supplementation", has integrated and expanded on physiological principals and diagnostic tools developed by BPA Project # 1993-056-00 (Advancements in hatchery reform Research) and applied them at a hatchery production scale.

2. This project is integrally related to the Yakima Supplementation program and has broad applicability to all salmon supplementation and production hatchery programs throughout the Columbia and Snake River Basins.  The Yakima Supplementation Project (BPA Project #’s 1995-063-25, 1997-013-25) is the most extensive test of supplementation hatchery principals in the Columbia and Snake River Basins. Over the past several years we have characterized the physiological development of wild and hatchery spring Chinook salmon in the Yakima River (Beckman et al. 2000; Larsen et al. 2004, 2006, 2010b) in an effort to design hatchery rearing regimes for this and other supplementation programs.  Pearsons et al. (2004), in a BPA report on their work on the Yakima River suggest, “Our results indicate that the natural abundance, distribution, age/size, and behavior of precocially mature spring Chinook salmon on the spawning grounds are being altered by the release of precocially mature hatchery fish.”.  Because of the significant implications of these findings, we have received extensive encouragement and support from all state and tribal project stakeholders to pursue this ongoing research.  In cooperation with the Yakima Supplementation Project we shared costs for installation of experimental rearing vessels for a series of growth modulation studies conducted at the CESRF for this project.  The Yakama Nation fisheries managers have historically assisted us with collections of migrating juvenile and precociously maturing male salmonids at Roza and Prosser Dam smolt traps on the Yakima River.  They have also provided us with excess gametes for laboratory based growth modulation studies that are an integral part of this work.  Through these efforts we have quantified rates of precocious male maturation in wild Yakima spring Chinook salmon and made significant progress in refining rearing strategies for controlling high rates of precocious male maturation in the CESRF population (Larsen et al. 2006).  The ultimate goal of this research is to develop hatchery reform strategies for use in all county, state, tribal, and federal hatcheries that aim to produce fish that have similar morphological, physiological, and life-history attributes as their naturally reared cohorts.

3. We have expanded our minijack monitoring effort to other hatchery programs throughout the Columbia and Snake River basins including Leavenworth, Entiat, Winthrop National Fish Hatcheries and Imnaha and Lostine populations reared at Lookingglass Hatchery in NE Oregon under the Grande Ronde M&E program (#1998-007-2) and Summer Chinook stocks reared for mitigation by Washington State and Chelan County PUD in the Similkameen, Methow, Okanogan, and Methow basins.

4.   Results from this project lead directly to current collaborative contract studies with the CTWS and ODFW monitoring minijack rates and smolt quality in production fish reared for the Hood River spring Chinook salmon production monitoring and evaluation project # 1988-053-03.  This program has historically produced significant numbers of minijacks, however the exact proportion of the release is not known.  Results from this study will be used to determine true minijack rates of fish produced at each of 3 facilities being considered for long term rearing (Carson, Round Butte, Parkdale) and the result will be used refine and optimize the rearing regime used for that program in the future.

5.  Our expertise and research methods are being used to monitor life-history composition (minijack prevalence) and smolt quality  for a Chelan County PUD funded project exploring the efficacy of partial water reuse technology for use in rearing Summer Chinook stocks in the upper Columbia River basin.

6.  Both Larsen and Beckman are drawing on expertise developed through this project to collaborate on the most recent iteration of BPA project  #1993-056-00 (Advancements in hatchery reform Research) examining the efficacy of rearing Steelhead salmon under S1 versus S2 regimes in supplementation programs to reduce residualism and improve smolt quality in the Methow River basin.

7.   Our past conference presentations (Regional and National AFS, Fish Culture Conference, Yakima Basin Science and Management Conference), publications and BPA reports precipitated contact from Lance Clarke, Fisheries Biologist, ODFW regarding collaborative assistance with resolving issues associated with high minijack rates in the Umatilla Fall Chinook hatchery program (BPA # 1990-005-00) that is a major component of this current research proposal.


Primary Focal Species
Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Mid-Columbia River Spring ESU
Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Snake River Fall ESU (Threatened)
Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Snake River Spring/Summer (not listed)
Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Snake River Spring/Summer ESU (Threatened)
Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Upper Columbia River Spring ESU (Endangered)
Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Upper Columbia River Summer/Fall ESU

Secondary Focal Species
Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Deschutes River Summer/Fall ESU
Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Lower Columbia River ESU (Threatened)
Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Upper Willamette River ESU (Threatened)

Describe how you are taking into account potential biological and physical effects of factors such as non-native species, predation increases, climate change and toxics that may impact the project’s focal species and their habitat, potentially reducing the success of the project. For example: Does modeling exist that predicts regional climate change impacts to your particular geographic area? If so, please summarize the results of any predictive modeling for your area and describe how you take that into consideration.
Threats to program investments and project success: View instructions
Climate Change and salmonid life-history decisions:  
While we don't anticipate any short term effects of climate change scenarios on this project, experiments conducted through this project that address the effects of emergence timing and growth will provide valuable data for making predictions about the potential impacts climate change scenarios may have on life-history of salmonids both in the hatchery and the natural environment.  Water temperature is a primary regulator of aquatic systems, controlling life cycles of aquatic organisms (Ward and Stanford 1979), benthic macroinvertebrate community composition (e.g., Vinson 2001), and fish distribution and abundance (Brett 1971; Schlosser et al. 2000).  Human impacts on aquatic systems, such as large dams and climate change, are altering riverine thermal regimes locally and globally (Ficke et al. 2007, Nijssen et al. 2001).  Alterations in temperature regimes can induce mismatches between evolved life-histories and current environmental conditions, reducing both survival and fitness, and potentially threatening the persistence of populations.  Negative effects of changes in thermal variation have been documented in amphibians (Niehaus et al 2006) but have not been established for salmon.  Impacts of large dams on water temperature regimes include changes in daily means, shifts in seasonal patterns, and reductions in variability (Petts 1984; USACE 2000; Preece and Jones 2002).  For example, mean water temperatures below thermally stratified, bottom-released reservoirs tend to be unseasonably cold during summer, and unseasonably warm during fall and winter (Poff and Hart 2002).  Such dams also reduce small-scale variability in water temperature patterns at multiple temporal scales (Steel and Lange 2007), leaving an unnaturally stable thermal regime.  Declines of big-river fishes on the Colorado River have been attributed to dam-induced thermal changes; experimental studies have demonstrated reduced length, weight, and growth rates during early life history stages of all four study species as a result of the lower temperatures below those dams (Clarkson and Childs 2000).  Climate change is expected to increase riverine water temperatures, particularly in winter months and in higher latitudes (Nijssen 2001).  Alterations in snowpack and changes in flow regimes may exacerbate these thermal shifts (Battin et al. 2007). While future temperature regimes are unknown, it is likely that they will be less stable and more variable than those to which aquatic species have been adapted.  Such changes may alter food webs and change habitat availability and quality (Ficke et al 2007).

Salmonid dependence on and adaptation to thermal regimes.  
Fish physiology is inextricably tied to temperature (Ficke et al 2007); key life-history transitions, such as emergence timing, are regulated by temperature (Beacham and Murray 1990).  Under natural thermal regimes morphological, physiological and behavioral development are presumably synchronized; each is completed at the moment of fry emergence.  However, altered thermal regimes may decouple these processes, resulting in poorly performing fry at emergence with respect to metrics such as swimming ability, feeding ability, and growth capacity.  In this way, altered thermal regimes during incubation reduce the ability of fry to evade predators, resist disease, secure a suitable territory, capture and ingest prey, and effectively digest food.   Population scale models have suggested that salmon year class strength and overall population performance may be limited by ecological conditions during incubation (Greene et al.  2005).  Poor survival or fitness under altered conditions is one possibility; evolution to the new conditions is another even less well-studied possibility (Waples et al. 2007).  Given the observed and expected widespread changes in riverine temperature regimes, the complexity of the salmon life cycle, and the threatened status of many groups of salmon populations, their physiological, morphological, and behavioral responses to altered thermal regimes need to be quantified and the population-level impacts of these responses explored.  This project is well positioned to provide data to improve our understanding of these impacts on salmonid life-history and development.

Work Classes
What tools (e.g., guidance material, technologies, decision support models) are you creating and using that support data management and sharing?
<No answer provided>
Describe the process used to facilitate receiving and sharing of data, such as standardizing data entry format through a template or data steward, including data exchange templates that describe the data collection methods, and the provision of an interface that makes data electronically accessible.
<No answer provided>
Please describe the sources from which you are compiling data, as well as what proportion of data is from the primary source versus secondary or other sources?
<No answer provided>
Please explain how you manage the data and corresponding metadata you collect.
<No answer provided>
Describe how you distribute your project's data to data users and what requirements or restrictions there may be for data access.
<No answer provided>
What type(s) of RM&E will you be doing?
Status and Trend Monitoring
Action Effectiveness Research
Uncertainties Research (Validation Monitoring and Innovation Research)
Where will you post or publish the data your project generates?

Loading ...
Layers
Legend
Name (Identifier) Area Type Source for Limiting Factor Information
Type of Location Count
Columbia River Basin None

Project Deliverable definition: A significant output of a project that often spans multiple years and therefore may be accomplished by multiple contracts and multiple work elements. Contract Deliverables on the other hand are smaller in scope and correspond with an individual work element. Title and describe each Project Deliverable including an estimated budget, start year and end year. Title: A synopsis of the deliverable. For example: Crooked River Barrier and Channel Modification. Deliverable Description: Describe the work required to produce this deliverable in 5000 characters or less. A habitat restoration deliverable will contain a suite of actions to address particular Limiting Factors over time for a specified Geographic area typically not to exceed a species population’s range. Briefly include the methods for implementation, in particular any novel methods you propose to use, including an assessment of factors that may limit success. Do not go into great detail on RM&E Metrics, Indicators, and Methods if you are collecting or analyzing data – later in this proposal you’ll be asked for these details.
Project Deliverables: View instructions
Improve survival and reduce fitness loss in Columbia River URB Fall Chinook - Hatchery Scale Experiment (DELV-1)
ODFW and CTUIR plan to conduct a 2x2 factorial design experiment exploring the effects of two different commercial feeds (18 and 12% lipid) fed at two different rates (7 days/wk, 4 days/wk) on growth/smolt physiology and incidence of minijack maturation in yearling release URB fall Chinook salmon reared at Bonneville Hatchery for the Umatilla program over 4 consecutive brood years (BY 2010-2013). This project will be initiated by co-managers starting with brood year 2010 fish and we will will initiate monitoring of these studies with funding from the final year of our current Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation project (200203100) from the previous solicitation (FY07-09, extended to FY 10 and 11). This proposal covers the continuation of this multi-year project in to the 2012-2014 solicitation period reviewed in this proposal.

There are two goals for this study objective:
1. Determine the proportion of male Umatilla URB fall Chinook salmon undergoing early male maturation (age 2). Each treatment group will be screened for minijack maturation just prior to release from acclimation sites by measuring plasma 11-ketotstosterone (11-KT) using the established method of Larsen et al. (2004).

2. Assess seasonal physiological status of fish in the feeding study to help determine how seasonal changes in growth rate and adiposity may affect the propensity of male URB fall Chinook salmon to mature as minijacks and the smolt development of non-maturing fish. Approximately every other month throughout development we will sample representatives from each treatment for established physiological parameters including 11-KT (endocrine indicator of male maturation), plasma IGF-I (endocrine indicator of growth), gill Na+/K+-ATPase (enzyme indicator of smoltification), condition factor, smolt appearance, length, weight, whole body lipid (indicator of energetic status). These data will be used to assess the condition of fish from the three treatments and the control fish. Furthermore, these data can be used to correlate survival with physiological condition and life-history development to refine rearing regimes in Fall Chinook hatchery programs.

Potential limits to success:
There are three potential limits to success that must be considered and are very important to discuss in some detail. Limit 1) The treatments being employed at a production scale to reduce minijack rates will not be dramatic enough to cause a difference in minijack proportions. For example the 18% vs. 12% difference in dietary lipid level may result in significant reductions in whole body lipid level, but both are sufficiently high compared to the diet of wild fish (insects- 6% lipid). Both diets may still induce equally high minijack rates. These diets were limited, to some degree, by what is currently commercially available for fish feeds at this time. If this research reveals that more dramatic changes are necessary to reduce minijack rates that will be a useful result. In the interest of cost and effort we believe it is important to first explore potential "easy" changes to production strategies before taking on more dramatic changes in the future. This same argument could be used regarding the feed regime as well (7 vs 4 days per week ration). Limit 2) As with the production studies of High and Low Growth regime in the Yakima program, we may significantly reduce minijack rates, but at the expense of size at release and correspondingly, survival. In that program we were not able to achieve sufficient compensatory growth of the Low Growth regime in the spring due to low temperatures, and the programmatic decisions not to delay release time to equalize release sizes was made. In the end, presumably losses due to small smolt size overwhelmed losses due to minijack maturation. It should be noted that Yakima Spring Chinook salmon are perhaps the healthiest, highest quality fish this research group has examined over the past 20+ years of this field of study and SAR's for this program are comparatively quite high. Thus, it is understandable why the YKFP co-managers would choose this course of action. The long term genotypic effects these high levels of minijack production may have on selection for this population remain to be seen as discussed in the Background section of this proposal and are being monitored and addressed in Objective 3 (Long-term minijack monitoring in Yakima Spring Chinook). In the current proposal, effort will be made in the rearing regime from Dec to the time of release to equalize release sizes through ration modification in order to reconcile this important confounding factor. Limit 3) Results after the first year or two may show that the control regime has the best survival relative to the three treatments. Adaptive management will be employed to refine rearing regimes over the multi-year course of the study if necessary so as not to unduly impact the long term sustainability of the population.
Types of Work:

Develop rearing protocols to reduce minijack rates and optimize smolt development in URB Fall Chinook-Lab. scale expt. (DELV-2)
The long term aim of research under Ojbective 2 is to improve hatchery-rearing protocols to produce fish with life history characters similar to wild fish, and minimize artificial selection due to altered phenotypes of juvenile fish at release. The knowledge gained from this work will be used to help develop rearing guidelines that allow hatchery programs to take advantage of the increased survival found in yearling release without the disadvantage of un-naturally high rates of early male maturation. In this study the effects of two environmental factors, photoperiod (at emergence) and food availability (growth during early rearing) wil be assessed with regard to seasonal timing of smolting, and age of male maturity in URB fall Chinook salmon.

The experiment will be conducted using Umatilla River URB eyed eggs obtained from the Bonneville Hatchery in autumn 2012 and reared at the Northwest Fisheries Science Center Research Hatchery, NOAA Fisheries Seattle. At the time of ponding replicate treatments will be exposed to Early, Middle or Late Emergence photoperiod regimes and fed under either a High or Low ration according to the method of Beckman et al. (2007). This range of rearing regimes will allow us to examine the full range and proportion of life-history phenotypes expressed by URB Fall Chinook with regard to age of smoltification and early male maturation. Furthermore, monitoring of growth and development of treatment groups throughout the study will allow for a comprehensive understanding of the causative physiology driving the various life-histories.

Limits to success:
This methodology has been used successfully for similar studies of life-history diversity in both Winter (Sacramento) and Spring (Yakima) Chinook stocks. It is very likely to be successful for our proposed work with Fall Chinook. However, as with comparisons between Winter and Spring Chinook salmon, the life-history response with regard to magnitude was very different for these two run types and is likely to be different still for Fall Chinook. So, making predictions with regard to response is challenging. However, this fact speaks to the need for conducting these types of studies in a repeated systematic way in order to understand where there are and are not parallel results and applications to different Chinook Run types.
Types of Work:

Long-term minijack monitoring-Yakima Spring Chinook salmon (DELV-3)
The ultimate deliverable from this objective is an accurate estimate of the minijack rate, release size, and threshold size for maturity for each year (BY 2011-14) for CESRF Spring Chinook overall and for fish reared at each of the acclimation sites as well as in the long-term domestication study being conducted by the YKFP. This deliverable is considered a central element of the Yakima M and E program for the CESRF which serves as one of the central tests of the efficacy of using "supplementation" hatchery principals for recovery of Columbia River Salmon Stocks. These data are provided to the YKFP annually and used to make minijack corrected and uncorrected SAR estimates for each brood class. We will also continue to collect data for our long-term monitoring effort documenting minijack rates of the Supplemented Natural (SN) line and Hatchery Control (HH) Line of this program. The desired outcome is to document annual variation in the demographic trait and to determine if there is continued evidence of domestication selection associated with this trait occurring between the SN and HH lines. This demographic trait is an important component of the broader M and E plan for the Yakima Supplementation program.

Each March the raceway gates are opened for volitional release of Yakima Spring Chinook from each of three acclimation sites in the upper Yakima Basin at Clark Flat, Easton and Jack Creek. Just prior to release, in cooperation with pathologists from USFWS (Olympia, WA) we sample 60 fish per raceway for a total 1080 fish for size, gender, life-history (maturing male or smolt) and threshold size for male maturation (logistic regression). In addition at the Clark Flat acclimation site the YKFP is conducting a long-term domestication study comparing the normal Supplemented Natural (SN) genetic line (4 raceways) vs. a domesticated Hatchery Control (HH) line (2 raceways). We will sample an additional 120 fish from the HH line for monitoring the effect of hatchery domestication on minijack rate and threshold size for maturation as described in the History section of this proposal. Minijack rate is determined by measuring the androgen 11-ketotestosterone in all male fish (approximately 600 males total) according to the established method of Larsen et al. (2004).

Limits to success:
This objective and proposed deliverable is a continuation of work that is part of a long term monitoring effort. We have been highly successful at achieving the work set forth and see no limits to success.
Types of Work:


Objective: Improve survival and reduce fitness loss in Columbia River URB Fall Chinook - Hatchery Scale Experiment (OBJ-1)

Project Deliverables How the project deliverables help meet this objective*

Improve survival and reduce fitness loss in Columbia River URB Fall Chinook - Hatchery Scale Experiment (DELV-1)


Objective: Develop rearing protocols to reduce minijack rates and optimize smolt development in Hatchery Chinook-Lab. scale expt. (OBJ-2)

Project Deliverables How the project deliverables help meet this objective*

Develop rearing protocols to reduce minijack rates and optimize smolt development in URB Fall Chinook-Lab. scale expt. (DELV-2)


Objective: Long-term minijack monitoring-Yakima Spring Chinook salmon (OBJ-3)

Project Deliverables How the project deliverables help meet this objective*

Long-term minijack monitoring-Yakima Spring Chinook salmon (DELV-3)


*This section was not available on proposals submitted prior to 9/1/2011

RM&E Protocol Deliverable Method Name and Citation
Umatilla URB Fall Chinook hatchery study (2002-031-00) v1.0
URB Fall Chinook Emergence/Growth Experiment (2002-031-00) v1.0
Spring Chinook Minijack Monitoring (2002-031-00) v1.0

Project Deliverable Start End Budget
Improve survival and reduce fitness loss in Columbia River URB Fall Chinook - Hatchery Scale Experiment (DELV-1) 2011 2014 $717,740
Develop rearing protocols to reduce minijack rates and optimize smolt development in URB Fall Chinook-Lab. scale expt. (DELV-2) 2011 2014 $574,192
Long-term minijack monitoring-Yakima Spring Chinook salmon (DELV-3) 2011 2014 $143,547
Total $1,435,479
Requested Budget by Fiscal Year

Fiscal Year Proposal Budget Limit Actual Request Explanation of amount above FY2010
2011 $354,061 FY 2011 is the final year of funding from the 07-09( extended to 2010, 2011) solicitation with a budget of $354,061.
2012 $357,248
2013 $360,463
2014 $363,707
Total $0 $1,435,479
Item Notes FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014
Personnel $227,000 $228,639 $230,696 $232,772
Travel $5,665 $5,715 $5,767 $5,819
Prof. Meetings & Training $3,895 $3,930 $3,965 $4,000
Vehicles $5,311 $5,359 $5,407 $5,456
Facilities/Equipment (See explanation below) $0 $0 $0 $0
Rent/Utilities $0 $0 $0 $0
Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0
Overhead/Indirect $100,553 $101,458 $102,371 $103,292
Other Laboratory Supplies $11,637 $12,147 $12,257 $12,368
PIT Tags $0 $0 $0 $0
Total $354,061 $357,248 $360,463 $363,707
Major Facilities and Equipment explanation:
Laboratory and data analysis and base of operations is the Northwest Fisheries Science Center of the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, which is well equipped to conduct the proposed studies. We have analytical balances, centrifuges, a gamma and beta counter, ELISA plate readers, spectrophotometers, and chemical and radiation safety hoods. We have a vehicle that is equipped with sampling gear, nets, coolers, centrifuges for field sampling at the Bonneville Hatchery and Yakima River Spring Chinook acclimation sites. No additional equipment is requested. Fish rearing for Objective 1 will be conducted at Bonneville Hatchery. Fish will be sampled by dip-net from raceways until they are moved to acclimation facilities in February of each year at the Umatilla River Basin. After transfer of the differentially tagged production fish, a subset of 400 fish from each treatment group will be maintained separately by treatment in four 2.4 m diameter circular tanks at Bonneville Hatchery for final maturation determination in April just before the normal time of release from the acclimation sites. The fish rearing for Objective 2 will be conducted in a series of 12 1.4 m diameter circular tanks at the Northwest Fisheries Science Center research hatchery, Seattle, WA. This facility is equipped with flow through and recirculating egg incubation and water systems with heating and chilling capability, full ozonation, UV sterilization and biofiltration.

Source / Organization Fiscal Year Proposed Amount Type Description
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2011 $330,000 In-Kind NOAA Fisheries supplies laboratory facilities and supplies, fish culture facilities and supplies, administrative support and labor support. The likelihood of this support is very high.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2012 $335,000 In-Kind NOAA Fisheries supplies laboratory facilities and supplies, fish culture facilities and supplies, administrative support and labor support. The likelihood of this support is very high.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2013 $340,000 In-Kind NOAA Fisheries supplies laboratory facilities and supplies, fish culture facilities and supplies, administrative support and labor support. The likelihood of this support is very high.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2014 $345,000 In-Kind NOAA Fisheries supplies laboratory facilities and supplies, fish culture facilities and supplies, administrative support and labor support. The likelihood of this support is very high.

Amer, M.A., T. Miura, C. Miura, and K. Yamauchi. 2001. Involvement of sex steroid hormone in early stages of spermatogenesis in Japanese huchen (Hucho perryi). Biology of Reproduction 65:1057-1066. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 1975. Official Methods of Analysis, 12th edition, Washington, D.C. Araki, H., R. Arden, E. Olsen, B. Cooper, and M.S. Blouin. 2007. Reproductive success of captive-bred steelhead trout in the wild: evaluation of three hatchery programs in the Hood River. Conservation Biology. 21: 181-190. Aubin-Horth, N. and Dodson, J.J. 2004. Influence of individual body size and variable thresholds on the incidence of a sneaker male reproductive tactic in Atlantic salmon. Evolution. 56, 136-144. Battin, J., M.W. Wiley, M.H. Ruckelshaus, R.N. Palmer, E. Korb, K.K. Bartz, H. Imaki. Projected impacts of climate change on salmon habitat restoration. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:6720-6725. Beacham TD, and Murray CB. 1990. Temperature, egg size, and development of embryos and alevins of five species of Pacific salmon: a comparative analysis. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 119:927–945. Beckman, B. R. and W. W. Dickhoff. 1998. Plasticity of smolting in spring Chinook salmon: relation to growth and insulin-like growth factor-I. Journal of Fish Biology 53:808-826. Beckman, B. R., D. A. Larsen, C. Sharpe, B. Lee-Pawlak, and W. W. Dickhoff. 2000. Physiological status of naturally-rearing juvenile chinook salmon in the Yakima River: seasonal dynamics and changes associated with the parr-smolt transformation. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:727-753. Beckman, B. R., Larsen, D. A. and Dickhoff ,W. W. (2003). Life history plasticity in Chinook salmon: relation of size and growth rate to autumnal smolting. Aquaculture. 222, 149-165. Beckman, B. R., M. Shimizu, B. Gadberry, and K. A. Cooper. 2004b. Response of the somatotropic axis of juvenile coho salmon to alterations in plane of nutrition with an analysis of the relationships among growth rate and circulating IGF-I and 41 kDa IGFBP. General and Comparative Endocrinology 135:334-344. Beckman, B. R., W. Fairgrieve, K.A. Cooper, C. V. M. Mahnken, and R. J. Beamish. 2004a. Evaluation of endocrine indices of growth in post-smolt coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133:1057–1067. Beckman, B.R. and Larsen D.A. (2005). Up-stream migration of minijack (age-2) Chinook salmon in the Columbia River: behavior, abundance, distribution, and origin Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134:1520-1541. Beckman, B.R., Dickhoff, W.W., Zaugg, W.S., Sharpe, C., Hirtzel, S., Schrock, R., Larsen, D.A., Ewing, R.D., Palmisano, A., Schreck, C.B., and Mahnken C.V.W. (1999). Growth, smoltification, and smolt-to-adult return of spring chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from hatcheries on the Deschutes River, Oregon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 128:1125-1150. Beckman, B.R., Gadberry, B., Parkins, P., Cooper, K.A., and K. Arkush. 2007. State dependent life history plasticity in Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon: interactions among growth and photoperiod at emergence influence smolting pattern and precocious male maturation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 64:256-271. Beckman, B.R., Larsen, D.A, Lee Pawlak, B., and Dickhoff, W.W. 1998. The relationship of fish size and growth to migratory tendencies of Spring Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) smolts. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 18:537-546. Beckman, B.R., Larsen, D.A, Lee Pawlak, B., and Dickhoff, W.W. 1998. The relationship of fish size and growth to migratory tendencies of Spring Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) smolts. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 18:537-546. Beckman, B.R., Larsen, D.A., Sharpe, C., Lee-Pawlak, B., Schreck, C.B., and Dickhoff, W.W. (2000). Physiological status of naturally reared juvenile spring chinook salmon in the Yakima River: Seasonal dynamics and changes associated with smolting. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:727-753. Berejikian, B.A., M.J. Ford. 2004. Review of relative fitness of hatchery and natural salmon. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-61. Bilton, H. T. 1984. Returns of chinook salmon in relation to juvenile size at release. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1245. Boeuf, G., P. Y. Le Bail, and P. Prunet. 1989. Growth hormone and thyroid hormones during Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, smolting and after transfer to seawater. Aquaculture 82:257–268. Brett JR. 1971. Energetic responses of salmon to temperature: A study of some thermal relations in the physiology and freshwater ecology of sockeye salmon. Oncorhynchus nerka. American Zoologist 11:99-113. Campbell, B., J. T. Dickey, and P. Swanson. (2003). Endocrine changes during onset of puberty in male spring Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Biology of Reproduction 69:2109-2117. Clark, W.C. and Blackburn, J. 1994. Effect of growth on early sexual maturation in stream-type Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Aquaculture 121:95-103. Clarkson, R.W. and M.R. Childs. 2000. Temperature effects of hypolimnial-release dams on early life stages of Colorado River basin big-river fishes. Copeia 2000:402-412. Columbia River Basin Research Plan. 2006. http://www.nwcouncil.org/library/2006/2006-3.pdf Cuisset, B., P. Pradelles, D.E. Kime, E.R. Kuhn, P. Babin, F. Le Menn. 1994. Enzyme immunoassay for 11-ketotestosterone using acetylcholinesterase as label. Application to the measurement of 11-ketotstosterone in plasma of Siberian sturgeon. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 108:229-241. Daughaday, W. H., and Rotwein, P., 1989. Insulin-like growth factor I and II: peptide, messenger ribonucleic acid and gene structures, serum, and tissue concentrations. Endocr. Rev. 10, 68-91. Dickhoff, W.W., Beckman, B. R., Larsen, D. A., Mahnken, C. V. W., Schreck, C. B., Sharpe, C, and Zaugg, W. S. (1995). Quality assessment of hatchery-reared spring chinook salmon smolts in the Columbia River Basin. 292-302. In H. L. Schramm and R. G. Piper eds. Uses and Effects of Cultured Fishes in Aquatic Ecosystems. Bethesda, Maryland, American Fisheries Society. Dickhoff, W.W., Beckman, B.R., Larsen, D.A., Duan, C., and Moriyama, S. (1997). The role of growth in the endocrine regulation of salmon smoltification. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 17:231-236. Ewing, R. D., and E. K. Birks. 1982. Criteria for parr–smolt transformation in juvenile chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Aquaculture 28:185–194. Farmer, G. F. 1994. Some factors which influence the survival of hatchery Atlantic salmon (Salmon salar) smolts utilized for enhancement purposes. Aquaculture 121:223-233. Fast, D.E. and L. Berg (eds.). (2001). Yakima Subbasin Summary. Northwest Power Planning Council, Portland, OR (http://www.cbfwa.org). Ficke, A.D., C.A. Myrick, and L.J. Hansen. 2007. Potential impacts of global climate change on freshwater fisheries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 17:581-613. Fish Passage Center. (2005). (http://www.fpc.org/hatchery_home.html). Foote, C. J., Clarke, W. C., and Blackburn, J. 1991. Inhibition of smolting in precocious male Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69:1848-1852. Ford, M. 2002. Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild. Conservation Biology. 16 (3), 815-825. Garant, D., I.A. Fleming, S. Einum and L. Bernatchez. (2003b). Alternative male life-history tactics as potential vehicles for speeding introgression of farm salmon traits into wild populations. Ecology Letters 6: 541-549. Garant, D., J.J. Dodson, and L. Bernatchez. (2003a). Differential reproductive success and heritability of alternative reproductive tactics in wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Evolution 57: 1133-1141. Gebhards, S.V. 1960. Biological notes on precocious male Chinook salmon parr in the Salmon River drainage, Idaho. Progressive Fish Culturist 22:121-123. Goodman, D. 2005. Selection equilibrium for hatchery and wild spawning fitness in integrated breeding programs. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62(2), 374-389. Greene, C.M., G.R. Pess, E. Beamer, E.A. Steel, and D.W. Jensen. 2005. Effects of environmental conditions during stream, estuary, and ocean residency on Chinook salmon return rates in the Skagit River, WA. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134:1562-1581. Hankin, D.G., J.W. Nicholas and T.W. Downey. (1993). Evidence for inheritance of age at maturity in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 50:347-358. Hard, J. 1995. Genetic monitoring of life-history characters in salmon supplementation: problems and opportunities. Pages 212-225 in H. L. Schramm, Jr. and R. G. Piper editors. Uses and effects of cultured fishes in aquatic ecosystems. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 15, Bethesda, Maryland. Heath, D.D., R.H. Devlin, J.W. Heath, and G. K. Iwama. (1994). Genetic, environmental and interaction effects on the incidence of jacking in Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Chinook salmon). Heredity 72:146-154. Henderson, M. A., and A. J. Cass. 1991. Effect of smolt size on smolt-to-adult survival for Chilko Lake sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:988-994. Herbinger, C.M. and Friars, G.W. (1992). Effects of winter temperature and feeding regime on the rate of early maturation in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) male parr. Aquaculture 101:147-162. Hopkins, C.L. and Unwin, M.J. (1997). The effect of restricted springtime feeding on growth and maturation of freshwater-reared chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Walbaum). Aquaculture Research 28:545-549. Howell, P., K. Jones, D. Scarnecchia, L. LaVoy, W. Kendra, and D. Ortmann. (1985). Stock assessment of Columbia River anadromous salmonids. Volume I: Chinook, coho, chum and sockeye salmon stock summaries. Final report to the Bonneville Power Administration, Project No. 83-335, Report DOE/BP-12737-1 (Available from the Bonneville Power Administration, P.O. Box 3621, Portland, OR 97208 or https://www.bpa.gov/efw/pub/searchpublication.aspx). Independent Science Review Panel and Independent Science Review Board. (2005). Monitoring and evaluation of supplementation projects. ISRP & ISAB 2005-15. Northwest Power and Conservation Council, Portland, OR. Jones, M.W., and J.A. Hutchings. (2001). The influence of male parr body size and mate competition on fertilization success and effective population size in Atlantic salmon Heredity 86:675-684. Jones, M.W., and J.A. Hutchings. (2002). Individual variation in Atlantic salmon fertilization success: Implications for effective population size. Ecological Applications 12: 184-193. Knudsen, C.M., S.L. Schroder, C.A. Busack, M.V. Johnston, T.N. Pearsons, W.J. Bosch, and D.E. Fast. 2006. Comparison of life history traits between first-generation hatchery and wild upper Yakima River Spring Chinook salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 135, 1130-1144. Larsen, D.A., B.R. Beckman, and K.A.Cooper. 2010b. Examining the conflict between smolting and precocious male maturation in spring (stream-type) Chinook salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139: 564-578. Larsen, D.A., B.R. Beckman, K.A. Cooper, D. Barrett, M. Johnston, P. Swanson, and W.W. Dickhoff. (2004). Assessment of high rates of precocious male maturation in a spring chinook salmon supplementation hatchery program. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133:98-120. Larsen, D.A., Beckman, B.R., and Dickhoff, W.W. (2003). Physiological assessment of wild and hatchery juvenile salmonids. U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA Report DOE/BP-00005943-1). 130pp. Larsen, D.A., Beckman, B.R., Harstad, D., Strom, C., Parkins, P., Cooper, K., Johnston, M., Spangenberg, D., Fast, D.E., and Dickhoff, W.W. (2010a). Growth rate modulation in spring Chinook salmon supplementation. Annual report to U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA Report #in review) 44pp. Larsen, D.A., Beckman, B.R., Strom, C., Parkins, P., Cooper, K., Johnston, M., Fast, D.E., and Dickhoff, W.W. (2007). Growth rate modulation in spring Chinook salmon supplementation. Annual report to U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA Report #P104644) 28pp. Larsen, D.A., Beckman, B.R., Strom, C., Parkins, P., Cooper, K.A., Johnston, M., Fast, D., and Dickhoff, W.W. (2005). Growth rate modulation in spring Chinook salmon supplementation. Annual report to U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA Report DOE/BP-00017450-1) 49pp. Larsen, D.A., Beckman, B.R., Strom, C.R., Parkins, P.J., Cooper, K.A., Fast, D.E., and Dickhoff, W.W. (2006). Growth modulation alters the incidence of early male maturation and physiological development of hatchery reared spring Chinook salmon: a comparison with wild fish. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 135:1017-1032. Lichatowich, J. (1999). Salmon without rivers. Island Press, Washington DC, 317pp. Lundqvist, H., S. McKinnell, H. Fangstrom, and I. Berglund. 1994. The effect of time, size and sex on recapture rates and yield after river releases of Salmon salar smolts. Aquaculture 121:245-257. Madsen, S. S. and H. A. Bern. 1993. In-vitro effects of insulin-like growth factor-I on gill Na+,K+-ATPase in coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch. Journal of Endocrinol. 1381:23-30. Martin, R. M. and A. Wertheimer. 1989. Adult production of Chinook salmon reared at different densities and released as two smolt sizes. Progressive Fish-Culturist 51:194-200. McCormick, S. 1996. Effects of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I on salinity tolerance and gill Na+, K+-ATPase in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): interaction with cortisol. General and Comparative Endocrinology 101:3-11. McCormick, S. D. 1993. Methods for nonlethal gill biopsy and measurement of Na+/K+-ATPase activity. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 50:656-658. McCormick, S. D., B. T. Bjornsson, M. Sheridan, C. Eilertson, J. B. Carey, and M. O’Dea. 1995. Increased day length stimulates plasma growth hormone and gill Na+ K+- ATPase in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Journal of Comparative Physiology B 165:245-254. Milks, D., M. Varney, and M.L.Schuck. (2003). Lyons Ferry Hatchery evaluation: fall Chinook salmon annual report 2000. Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife, Olympia, WA. Fish program report number FPA 03004. (http://lsnakecomplan.fws.gov/) Mobrand, L., J. Barr, H.L. Blankenship, D.E. Campton, T.T.P. Evelyn, T. Flagg, C. Mahnken, L.W. Seeb, P.R. Seidel, and W.W. Smoker. 2005. Hatchery reform in Washington State: principals and emerging issues. Fisheries 30(6), 11-23. Muir, W.D., S.G. Smith, J.G. Williams, E.E. Hockersmith, and J.R. Skalski. (2001). Survival estimates for migrant yearling chinook salmon and steelhead tagged with passive integrated transponders in the lower Snake and lower Columbia rivers, 1993-1998. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21: 269-282. Mullan, J.W., Rockhold, A., and Chrisman, C. R. 1992. Life histories and precocity of Chinook salmon in the Mid-Columbia River. Progressive Fish Culturist 54:25-28. Myers, R. A. (1984). Demographic consequences of precocious maturation of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41:1349-1353. Myers, R.A. and J.A. Hutchings. 1986. Selection against parr maturation in Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture 53: 313-320. National Marine Fisheries Service. (2000). Biological Opinion, Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation of the Federal Columbia River Power System, Hatchery and Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA). (www.nwr.noaa.gov/1hydrop/hydroweb/docs/Final/2000Biop.html). National Research Council. (1996). Upstream: Salmon and Society in the Pacific Northwest. NRC, Report of the Committee on Protection and Management of the Pacific Northwest Anadromous Salmonids. Board on environmental Studies and Toxicology and Commission on Life Sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 452 pp. Niehaus, A.C., RS. Wilson, and C.E. Franklin. 2006. Short- and long-term consequences of thermal variation in the larval environment of anurans. J. Animal Ecol. 75:686-692. Nijssen, B., G.M. O’Donnell, A.F. Hamlet, and D.P. Lettenmier. 2001. Hydrologic sensitivity of global rivers to climate change. Climate Change 50:43-75. Northwest Power and Conservation Council. 2010. Draft Columbia River Basin Monitoring, Evaluation, Research and Reporting (MERR) Plan.. 53pp. http://www.nwcouncil.org/library/2010/2010-10.pdf Northwest Power and Conservation Council. (2004). Artificial Production Review and Evaluation: Final Basin Level Report. Document 2004-17. http://www.nwcouncil.org/library/isrp/isrp2005-15.htm Northwest Power and Conservation Council. (2005). Draft Columbia River Basin Research Plan. Olsen, E. (2003). Hood River and Pelton Ladder evaluation studies. Annual Report to the Bonneville Power Administration, Project No. 1988-053-04, Report DOE/BP-00004001-1. (Available from the Bonneville Power Administration, P.O. Box 3621, Portland, OR 97208 or https://www.bpa.gov/efw/pub/searchpublication.aspx). Olsen, E. 2007. Hood River and Pelton Ladder evaluation studies. Annual Report to the Bonneville Power Administration, Project 1988–053-04, Report Document ID #P106821. Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon. Available: www.bpa.gov. Pearsons, T., Fast, D., Bosch, W., Kundsen, C., Schroder, S., Busack, C., Johnston, M., Nicolai, S., Lind, D., Fritts, A., Temple, G., Johnson, C., Fredricksen, C., Siegel, J., Sampson, M., Easterbrooks, J. “Yakama/Klickitat Fisheries Project; Spring Chinook Salmon Supplementation in Upper Yakima Basin Executive Summary”. 2006. Annual Report, Project No. 199506425, 44 electronic pages, (BPA Report DOE/BP-00023618-1). Pearsons, T.N., C.L. Johnson, B.B. James, and G. M. Temple. (2004). Spring Chinook salmon interactions indices and residual/precocial monitoring in the Upper Yakima Basin. Annual Report to the Bonneville Power Administration. Project No. 1995-063-25, Report DOE/BPA-00013756-5. (Available from the Bonneville Power Administration, P.O. Box 3621, Portland, OR 97208 or https://www.bpa.gov/efw/pub/searchpublication.aspx). Pearsons, T.N., C.L. Johnson, B.B. James, and G. M. Temple. 2009. Abundance and distribution of precociously mature male spring Chinook salmon of hatchery and natural origin in the Yakima River. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 29:778-790. Petts, G. E. 1984. Impounded rivers: perspectives for ecological management. New York, John Wiley and Sons. Piche, J., J.A. Hutchings, and W. Blanchard. 2008. Genetic variation in threshold reaction norms for alternative reproductive tactics in male Atlantic salmon, Salmon salar. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Biological Sciences. 275: 1571-1575. Pierce, A. L., B. R. Beckman, K. D. Shearer, D. A. Larsen, and W. W. Dickhoff. 2001. Effects of ration on somatotropic hormones and growth in coho salmon. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 128:255-264. Poff, N. L., and D. D. Hart. 2002. How dams vary and why it matters for the emerging science of dam removal. BioScience 52:659-668. Power, G. (1986). Physical influences on age at maturity of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): a synthesis of ideas and questions. In Meegurg, D.J. (Ed.). Salmonid age at maturity. Canadian Special Publications Fisheries Aquatic Science 89:91-101. Preece RM , and Jones HA. 2002. The effect of Keepit Dam on the temperature regime of the Namoi River, Australia. River Res. and Appl. 18:397-414. Prunet, P., G. Boeuf, J. P. Bolton, and G. Young. 1989. Smoltification and seawater adaptation in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): plasma prolactin, growth hormone, and thyroid hormones. General and Comparative Endocrinology 74:355–364. Quinn TP, Vollestad LA, Peterson J, Gallucci V. (2004). Influences of freshwater and marine growth on the egg size-egg number tradeoff in Coho and Chinook salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133: 55-65. Reisenbichler, R.R., and S.P. Rubin. (1999). Genetic changes from artificial propagation of Pacific salmon affect the productivity and viability of supplemented populations. ICES Journal Marine Science 56:459-466. Roff, D.A. 1996. The evolution of threshold traits in animals. Quarterly Review of Biology. 71: 3-35. Rowe, D.K., and Thorpe, J.E. (1990). Suppression of maturation in male Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) parr by reduction in feeding and growth during spring months. Aquaculture 86:291-313. Rowe, D.K., Thorpe, J.E., Shanks, A.M. (1991). The role of fat stores in the maturation in male Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) parr. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 48:405-413. Sakamoto, T., S. D. McCormick, and T. Hirano. 1993. Osmoregulatory actions of growth hormone and its mode of action in salmonids: a review. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 11:155–164. Schlosser IJ, Johnson JD, Knotek WL, Lapinska M. 2000. Climate variability and size-structured interactions among juvenile fish along a lake-stream gradient. Ecology 81:1046-1057. Shearer, K.D., and Swanson, P. (2000). The effect of whole body lipid on early sexual maturation of 1+ age male chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Aquaculture 190:343-367. Shearer, K.D., P. Parkins, B. Gadberry, B. R. Beckman, and P. Swanson. 2006. The effects of growth rate / body size and a low lipid diet on the incidence of early sexual maturation in male spring Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Aquaculture. 252: 545-5567. Silverstein, J. T. and H. Shimma. (1994). Effect of restricted feeding on early maturation in female and male amago salmon, Oncorhynchus masou ishikawae. Journal of Fish Biology 45:1133-1135. Silverstein, J. T. and W. K. Hershberger. (1992). Precocious maturation in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): estimation of the additive genetic variance. Journal of Heredity 83:282-286. Silverstein, J.T., H. Shimma, H. Ogata. (1997). Early maturity in amago salmon (Oncorhynchus masou ishikawai): an association with energy storage. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54:444-451. Silverstein, J.T., Shearer, K.D., Dickhoff, W.W., and E.M. Plisetskaya. (1998). Effects of growth and fatness on sexual development of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) parr. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 55:2376-2382. Small, B.C. and Peterson B.C. 2005. Establishment of a time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay for measuring plasma insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in fish: effect of fasting on plasma concentrations and tissue mRNA expression of IGF-I and growth hormone (GH) in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). Domestic Animal Endocrinology 28: 202-215. Steel, E.A. and I.A. Lange. 2007. Alteration of water temperature regimes at multiple scales: Effects of multi-purpose dams in the Willamette River basin. River Research and Applications 23:351-359. Sweeting, R. M., G. F. Wagner, and B. A. McKeown. 1985. Changes in plasma glucose, amino acid nitrogen, and growth hormone during smoltification and seawater adaptation in coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch. Aquaculture 45:185–197. Taggart, J.B., I.S. McLaren, D.W. Hay, J.H., Webb, and A.F. Youngson. (2001). Spawning success in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.): a long-term DNA profiling-based study conducted in a natural stream. Molecular Ecology 10:1047-1060. Thorpe, J. E. (2004). Life history responses of fishes to culture. Journal of Fish Biology (Suppl. A) 65:263-285. Umatilla Subbasin Plan. 2004. http://www.nwcouncil.org/fw/subbasinplanning/umatilla/plan/ Underwood, K., C. Chapman, N. Ackerman, K. Witty, S. Cramer, and M. Hughes. (2003). Hood River production program review. BPA Report DEO/BP-000101531-1. (Available from the Bonneville Power Administration, P.O. Box 3621, Portland, OR 97208 or https://www.bpa.gov/efw/pub/searchpublication.aspx). Unwin, M. J., M. T. Kinnison, and T. P. Quinn. (1999). Exceptions to semelparity: Postmaturation, survival, morphology, and energetics of male Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56:1172-1181. Upper Snake River Subbasin Plan. 2004. http://www.nwcouncil.org/fw/subbasinplanning/uppersnake/plan/ USACE. US Army Corps of Engineers. 2000. Biological assessment of the effects of the Willamette River Basin Flood Control Project on listed species under the Endangered Species Act. Submitted to the National Marine Fisheries Service and the US Fish and Wildlife Service: Portland, OR. Vinson MR. 2001. Long-term dynamics of an invertebrate assemblage downstream from a large dam. Ecol. Appl. 11:711-730. Virtanen, E., L. Soderholm-Tana, A. Soivio, L. Forsman, and M. Muona. 1991. Effect of physiological condition and smoltification status at smolt release on subsequent catches of adult salmon. Aquaculture 97:231-257. Wagner, H. H., F. P. Conte, and J. L. Fessler. 1969. Development of osmotic and ionic regulation in two races of chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 29:325–341. Waples, R. S., R. W. Zabel, M. D. Scheuerell, and B. L. Sanderson. 2007. Evolutionary responses by native species to major anthropogenic changes to their ecosystems: Pacific salmon in the Columbia River hydropower system. Molecular Ecology 16:84-96. Waples, R.S. (1999). Dispelling some myths about hatcheries. Fisheries 24:12-21. Ward J.V. and Stanford J.A. 1979. Ecological factors controlling stream zoobenthos with emphasis on thermal modification of regulated streams. In The ecology of regulated streams. Ward JV, Stanford JA. (eds.). Plenum Press: New York: pgs 35-56. Ward, B. R. and P. A. Slaney. 1988. Life history and smolt-to-adult survival of Keogh River steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and the relationship to smolt size. Canadan Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45:1110-1122. Ward, B.R., P. A. Slaney, A. R. Facchin, and R. W. Land. (1989). Size-biased survival in steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): back-calculated lengths from adults' scales compared to migrating smolts at the Keogh River, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46:1853-1858. Williams, R.N. (ed). (2006). Return to the river. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington MA, 699 pp. Yakima Subbasin Plan. 2004. http://www.nwcouncil.org/fw/subbasinplanning/yakima/plan/ Young, G., B. T. Bjornsson, P. Prunet, R. J. Lin, and H. A. Bern. 1989. Smoltification and seawater adaptation in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): plasma prolactin, growth hormone, thyroid hormone, and cortisol. General and Comparative Endocrinology 74:335–345. Zar, J.H. (1984). Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ, 718 pp. Zaugg, W. S., and C. V. W. Mahnken. 1991. The importance of smolt development to successful marine ranching of Pacific salmon. Pages 35–42 in R. S. Svrjeck, editor. Marine ranching: proceedings of the seventeenth U.S.–Japan meeting on aquaculture, Ise, Mie Prefecture, Japan. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 102. Zaugg,W. S. 1989. Migratory behavior of underyearling Oncorhynchus tshawytscha and survival to adulthood as related to prerelease gill (Na+-K+)- ATPase development. Aquaculture 82:339–353. Zimmerman, C. E., R. W. Stonecypher, and M. C. Hayes. (2003). Migration of precocious male hatchery chinook salmon in the Umatilla River, Oregon. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 23:1006-1014.

Review: RME / AP Category Review

Independent Scientific Review Panel Assessment

Assessment Number: 2002-031-00-ISRP-20101015
Project: 2002-031-00 - Growth Modulation in Salmon Supplementation
Review: RME / AP Category Review
Proposal Number: RMECAT-2002-031-00
Completed Date: 12/17/2010
Final Round ISRP Date: 12/17/2010
Final Round ISRP Rating: Meets Scientific Review Criteria
Final Round ISRP Comment:
The project is providing a major benefit to fish and wildlife simply by bringing the high frequency of minijack age 2 maturing males to light. It is a result of fish culture practice that not only biases SAR estimation but also is probably a source of domestication selection. The project scientists are well positioned to understand the problem physiologically and to evaluate fish-culture practices.

1. Purpose, Significance to Regional Programs, Technical Background, and Objectives

There are very compelling ties to regional programs and to the Council’s Fish and Wildlife Program – the proponents have identified a major problem with Chinook supplementation and offer the prospect of adaptive change of practices:

Objective 1) Improve survival and reduce fitness loss in Columbia River URB Fall Chinook salmon.

Objective 2) Refine rearing protocols to reduce minijack rates and optimize smolt development in URB Fall Chinook salmon.

Objective 3) Continue long-term minijack monitoring in Spring Chinook salmon from the Yakima River Supplementation Program.


2. History: Accomplishments, Results, and Adaptive Management

The project scientists are an experienced team with a strong record of publishing results. They have demonstrated an insidious problem and clearly describe past and future adaptive changes to fish culture practices that have occurred or will occur as a result of this research.

3. Project Relationships, Emerging Limiting Factors, and Tailored Questions for Type of Work (Hatchery, RME, Tagging)

The proposal explains how the research will affect other activities in the region, as well as serve as a model for other regions. The proponents also broach the subject of climate change and how that may contribute to the minijack problem in this and other systems.

4. Deliverables, Work Elements, Metrics, and Methods

The proposal does a great job of describing deliverables (as well as reviewing their past progress and difficulties in meeting past deliverable due dates). That candor is refreshing! The level of detail explaining methodology (both experimental and analytical) was outstanding
First Round ISRP Date: 10/18/2010
First Round ISRP Rating: Meets Scientific Review Criteria
First Round ISRP Comment:

The project is providing a major benefit to fish and wildlife simply by bringing the high frequency of minijack age 2 maturing males to light. It is a result of fish culture practice that not only biases SAR estimation but also is probably a source of domestication selection. The project scientists are well positioned to understand the problem physiologically and to evaluate fish-culture practices. 1. Purpose, Significance to Regional Programs, Technical Background, and Objectives There are very compelling ties to regional programs and to the Council’s Fish and Wildlife Program – the proponents have identified a major problem with Chinook supplementation and offer the prospect of adaptive change of practices: Objective 1) Improve survival and reduce fitness loss in Columbia River URB Fall Chinook salmon. Objective 2) Refine rearing protocols to reduce minijack rates and optimize smolt development in URB Fall Chinook salmon. Objective 3) Continue long-term minijack monitoring in Spring Chinook salmon from the Yakima River Supplementation Program. 2. History: Accomplishments, Results, and Adaptive Management The project scientists are an experienced team with a strong record of publishing results. They have demonstrated an insidious problem and clearly describe past and future adaptive changes to fish culture practices that have occurred or will occur as a result of this research. 3. Project Relationships, Emerging Limiting Factors, and Tailored Questions for Type of Work (Hatchery, RME, Tagging) The proposal explains how the research will affect other activities in the region, as well as serve as a model for other regions. The proponents also broach the subject of climate change and how that may contribute to the minijack problem in this and other systems. 4. Deliverables, Work Elements, Metrics, and Methods The proposal does a great job of describing deliverables (as well as reviewing their past progress and difficulties in meeting past deliverable due dates). That candor is refreshing! The level of detail explaining methodology (both experimental and analytical) was outstanding

Documentation Links:
Proponent Response:
2008 FCRPS BiOp Workgroup Assessment Rating:  Response Requested
BiOp Workgroup Comments: Please identify:
1. Why your data is "not electronically available"; and
2. What data sets will not be "electronically available" for various deliverables. Please specify the deliverable that is not electronically available. (Note a data set includes the raw data collected and additional data on analysis). For example if there is a deliverable for population adult abundance or habitat, we expect your raw and synthesized data to be made available electronically.
- Your response may help BPA identify funding needs for data repositories or identify an existing data warehouse that your data could be stored.

The BiOp RM&E Workgroups made the following determinations regarding the proposal's ability or need to support BiOp Research, Monitoring and Evaluation (RME) RPAs. If you have questions regarding these RPA association conclusions, please contact your BPA COTR and they will help clarify, or they will arrange further discussion with the appropriate RM&E Workgroup Leads. BiOp RPA associations for the proposed work are: ( )
All Questionable RPA Associations ( ) and
All Deleted RPA Associations (64.2 65.2)
Proponent Response:

The two principal types of data compiled by this research project are smolt development physiological profiles (growth hormone levels, size, gill ATPase enzyme levels) and age-2 early male maturation (minijack) rates (11-ketotestosterone steroid levels) from fish reared either in laboratory based studies or production hatcheries.  There are no repositories for this type of data beyond the peer review literature.  This project has a strong record of publishing our findings in the peer reviewed literature.  However, there is some delay of perhaps years for multi-year studies in the collection of the samples, running of the laboratory assays, analyzing and interpreting the data.  Shorter term results can always be found in the BPA annual reports on line.  Neither of these repositories were listed as options in Taurus.   As this study has revealed, up to half of the male fish produced in some Chinook hatcheries are not smolts, but minijack maturing males. Minijack rates may be a useful metric for hatcheries to know, however to our knowledge, no hatchery program keeps track of this parameter.   Finally, in past and proposed work from this project different production rearing treatments were partially pit-tagged.  Survival and adult return data from those studies is available in Pit-taggis.  Thus, there is some indirect repository of data in that format.