Show new navigation
On
Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program
SOW Report
Contract 73789: 2008-507-00 EXP CRITFC INTER-TRIBAL MONITORING DATA
Project Number:
Title:
CRITFC Inter-Tribal Monitoring Data
Stage:
Implementation
Area:
Province Subbasin %
Basinwide - 100.00%
Contract Number:
73789
Contract Title:
2008-507-00 EXP CRITFC INTER-TRIBAL MONITORING DATA
Contract Continuation:
Previous: Next:
70127: 2008-507-00 EXP CRITFC INTER-TRIBAL MONITORING DATA
  • 77134: 2008-507-00 EXP CRITFC INTER-TRIBAL MONITORING DATA
Contract Status:
Closed
Contract Description:
The purpose of the Inter-Tribal Monitoring Data Project (ITMD) is to assist CRITFC and its member tribes in the timely and accurate capture, storage, processing, and dissemination of data for management of anadromous fish and their habitats.

There are four main goals for the project.

1. Assist CRITFC and member tribes to develop cost effective computer architectures and data management strategies for anadromous fish and habitat data. This basically entails:
a) Developing pilot systems and tools and demonstrating cost effective ways to collect, store, summarize, and disseminate fish and habitat data.
b) Assisting in the construction of defensible accounting systems for tribal natural resources.
c) Converting successful pilot projects into production computer applications as resources allow.
d) Addressing immediate data management needs for co-management of the resource to free up staff and resources to address regiona... l issues.

2. Provide data management services to the tribes. These take a variety of forms, but include:
a. Partial support for tribal data coordinators (in this expanded proposal),
b. Developing shared data capture, management, and reporting tools for CRITFC and member tribes,
c. Expert advice and coordination of efforts, especially through the annual Tribal Data Workshops, and
d. Limited support for tribal infrastructure through one-time purchases of hardware and software.

3. Assist member tribes to build internal capacity for improved data management and to achieve the tribal gravel-to-gravel management vision of the Commission. Combine local data from tribal sources with regional and international data on mainstem, estuary and ocean impacts on salmon and salmon management decisions; and

4. Enable tribal participation in regional data management and coordination processes: provide tribal input and coordination on regional coordination of data management, sharing best practices, and facilitate inter-tribal coordination on the level of monitoring data.

At the end of the first six years of the project, a suite of pilot projects has been developed, and some pilots have already displayed demonstrable success and have been moved into production. A functional design for a coordinated tribal data architecture has been completed and a detailed design is under development. The data management approach and technology used in the current pilot projects has proven successful, and can be applied elsewhere. The expectation is that the technologies used in the pilots will be used to address priorities identified in the Coordinated Assessment process, BPA Data Management Framework, and the ITMD Data Management Framework.

ITMD system architectures depend on a few simple principles developed over 30 years of building complex applications and computer systems.

1. The most cost effective and fastest data management systems are those that enter field data only one time. It is always more expensive to re-enter the same data into multiple formats (e.g. paper forms, spreadsheets and databases).

2. QA and QC should be as close to the field staff as possible. The person who collects the data is the best at performing QA/QC on that data, for he/she knows the most about the data. QA/QC is far more accurate and cost effective when first performed by the field staff. QA/QC may also be needed upstream as data is analyzed, aggregated, and summarized.

3. Defensible accounting needs to be an integral part of the system design. Chain of custody and chain of evidence are concepts used in the legal system to describe the admissibility of certain kinds of data. A paper trail and an audit trail are a good start. Transparency means being able to show your work at every level of derivation. Data in the Columbia Basin is often subjected to scientific, judicial, and policy review; data management systems must make it simple and cost effective to trace the results of an analysis back to data collection in the field, and responsibility for the data collection must be able to be traced back to identifiable field staff.

4. To get buy-in from the field staff, provide tools that actually make their job easier. To get management buy-in, provide aggregated data more accurately and timely than previously available.

5. Minimize fish handling, minimize stress on fish. When monitoring ESA listed fish in the Columbia Basin, there are so many concurrent studies, over handling of fish is a recurrent problem. Monitoring Programs should be designed to collect the minimum amount of data required to ensure the survival of the species and the recovery of the species.

6. Focus effort on getting the field data into tribal data repositories using SQL servers configured similar to the Central Database Management System (CDMS) (if feasible) developed by the CTUIR. Store each project’s data in tables designed for the individual project, and assemble the individual project tables into a master table when feasible. Once the master tables are available, they can be used to produce the CA Indicator tables. Once data is in an SQL or CDMS server, it is a relatively simple matter to aggregate and summarize the data into various formats. SQL or CDMS servers connected to GIS and web services (using. AngularJS) provide one the most flexible method of outputting monitoring data into whatever formats management needs (GIS, Tabular, Graphic) now and in the future.

7. Build on existing field data collection methods and practices whenever possible to minimize training expense and disruption of current field data collection efforts.

8. Access to the raw monitoring data should be controlled by the data originator to insure proper interpretation of the information.

Current Pilot and Production Projects using digital pen technology and web services architecture include the following:

1. Bonneville Adult Fish Facility Data Management
2. Snake River Harvest Estimate
3. Zone 6 Harvest Estimate (Nez Perce component)
4. Zone 6 Harvest Estimate (Tribal  Platform, Gillnet, Subsistence)
5. Below Bonneville Harvest Estimate (Nez Perce component)
6. Kelt data management project
7. Klickitat Basin Surveys (RAHAP)
a. Spawner Patch Survey
b. Habitat Unit Survey
c. Large woody debris survey
d. Stream Bedrock survey
e. Large woody debris jam survey
f. Discharge data
g. Electrofishing survey
h. Sampling events tracking table
i. Stream Survey Tracking table showing reaches for each stream


These projects all use paper forms and a digital pen to collect field data. This approach produces both a paper copy and an electronic copy of the data in one step. The data is transmitted to a web site in the cloud where an electronic copy of each form can be viewed by field staff from any web browser.

There are two QA/QC steps to insure accuracy before adding data to the database system. First, validation codes in each cell allows for range checking, lookup tables, and other constraints to reduce transcription and other errors. Second, field staff visually review the data to insure the OCR software has correctly interpreted the hand-written values on the data sheets before sending the data via web services to an SQL server hosted by the appropriate entity, be it CRITFC or a member tribe. Summarization, aggregation, and other data processing takes place on the SQL/CDMS servers, and the data is almost instantly made available on web sites under tribal management control in whatever form is required. Once the data is hosted on an SQL/CDMS server, it is a simple programming task to output it into whatever form is needed, on whatever schedule is needed (for example, DETs).

A digital copy of each form in the PDF format is also generated by this process, so one can trace any estimate back to the original paper forms, or an electronic scan of the original paper forms.

Other current pilot and production projects include:

1. CRITFC Web based tag loss application for estimating tag loss.
2. CRITFC Cloud Secure Tribal Repository (CCSTR) pronounced like 'sister'.
3. CRITFC Habitat Group habitat data database
4. Central Database Management System Pilots (CDMS)  (CRITFC, Yakama, Nez Perce)
5. Retrospective Accords tool
6. Prospective Accords tool
7. CRITFC GIS archive
8. Legacy regional adult abundance and harvest database (age class data)

Current resources are focused on assisting the tribes to get field data consolidated on tribal SQL or CDMS servers under the appropriate tribal management control. Project data will be stored in individual tables, and when feasible, a master table will be developed to consolidate data from multiple projects. Current funding supports the ongoing activities of the ITMD, and some new development. Additional resources are required to produce the estimates and analyses currently desired by the Coordinated Assessment Project from the existing field data. If the field data is consolidated under management control on SQL or CDMS servers, it is a straightforward task to produce any format needed by analysts.

Appendix M of the "Columbia River Basin Collaborative Data Sharing Strategy: Salmon and Steelhead Population Abundance and Productivity Indicators," completed in 2011, describes Tier 1 high priority data gaps that need to be filled to enable CRITFC member tribes to begin development of the three initial CA products for ESA listed populations. As the tribes gain capacity for data management, the question of sharing the three CA indicators with the region becomes largely a management issue, once the technical side of the problem is reduced to a manageable level.

The additional funds needed to fill these Tier 1 gaps is 351,000/annually on an ongoing basis. $1,000,000 in additional funding has been provided, which will enable the Inter-Tribal Monitoring Data Project (ITMD) to initially address the goals of the Collaborative Data Sharing Strategy, and the Framework for Fish and Wildlife Program Data Management for 3 years.

Consistent with the four goals of this project, each tribal subcontract contains six objectives focused on integration of tribal efforts with the regional Coordinated Assessment Project:

1. A Data Inventory for all BPA funded projects for each tribe, including metadata
2. Report on progress for a Tribal Data Management Strategy for each tribe
3. Report on progress on producing Monitoring Data Sharing Agreements for each tribe
4. Identification of and if practicable transfer of data sets and (VSP) estimates useful for regional management
5. Project metadata submitted to www.cbfish.org, www.monitoringmethods.org, www.monitoringresources.org; and produce dataset metadata produced in ISO9115, ISO91139, ISO1125, ISO 9110, CSDGM, z39.50, z39.85 as needed and as feasible.
6. Data management tools developed to meet immediate individual tribal data needs.

The specific statements of work and deliverables for each of the Tribal Data Stewards are found in attachments.
  
Account Type(s):
Expense
Contract Start Date:
09/15/2016
Contract End Date:
09/14/2017
Current Contract Value:
$553,528
Expenditures:
$553,528

* Expenditures data includes accruals and are based on data through 31-Mar-2025.

BPA CO:
Env. Compliance Lead:
None
Work Order Task(s):
Contract Type:
Contract (IGC)
Pricing Method:
Cost Reimbursement (CNF)
300 km
200 mi
Click the map to see this Contract's location details.

No photos have been uploaded yet for this Contract.

Viewing 16 of 16 Work Statement Elements
Sort Order
WSEV ID
WE ID
Work Element Name
Title
Description
WSE Effective Budget
% of Total WSE Effective Budget
WSE Start
WSE End
A172809185Produce CBFish Status ReportPeriodic Status Reports for BPAThe Contractor shall report on the status of milestones and deliverables in Pisces. Reports shall be completed either monthly or quarterly as determined by the BPA COTR. Additionally, when indicating a deliverable milestone as COMPLETE, the contractor shall provide metrics and the final location (latitude and longitude) prior to submitting the report to the BPA COTR.$7,5001.17%01/01/201709/14/2017
B172810189Coordination-Columbia BasinwideAttend coordinated assessment meetings, workshops, and hold at least 1 tribal data workshopProvide briefings and summaries to relevant CRITFC and tribal staff of meetings attended with the Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP), StreamNet, Fish Passage Center, Pit Tag Information System (PTAGIS), Regional Mark Processing Center (RMPC), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Northwest Power and Conservation Council (NWPCC, Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Foundation CBFWF, Oregon Dept. of fish and Wildlife (ODFW), Idaho Dept of Fish and Game (IDFG), Washington Dept of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), and the staff of other relevant entities. Participate, facilitate, and support discussions on regional data needs directly related to CRITFC tribes and the Fish and Wildlife program (this involves forums, workshops, work groups and meetings involving tribal, state, and federal entities). Host at least one tribal data workshop for member tribes.$20,0003.12%09/15/201609/14/2017
C172811114Identify and Select ProjectsUpdate tribal needs assessment and selection of existing data projects as needed (ongoing)Identify, select, and then update existing data management projects, that could be used to meet tribal data management and reporting needs. The identification and selection of data management projects often require a needs assessment that prescribes technology for data collection, infrastructure, and repositories for storage.$65,26510.18%09/15/201609/14/2017
D172812160Create/Manage/Maintain DatabaseUpdate Pilot Implementations (ongoing)Continue developing tools to build capacity within member tribes to manage monitoring data from field collection to tribal offices (from stream to screen). Continue to develop tools that improve speed, accuracy, and ease of data entry, aggregation, and reporting. Continue to develop infrastructure to support pilot implementations for these projects. (Assist tribes to build, staff, and maintain tribal data repositories identified under the inter-tribal data framework) Produce a progress report documenting pilot project progress, obstacles encountered, lessons learned, etc.$247,58838.63%09/15/201609/14/2017
E172813160Create/Manage/Maintain DatabaseData management tools developed and/or updated and/or identified to meet tribal needs.Develop and/or update databases, applications, web services and other hardware/software tools to meet tribal monitoring data needs.$75,00011.70%09/15/201609/14/2017
F172814160Create/Manage/Maintain DatabaseUpdate and Maintain Accords Database (ongoing)Member tribes have asked CRITFC to maintain an Accords/Remand database to facilitate storage, access, and management of expected and actual benefits derived from Accords projects. The Accords describe expected benefits for fish populations in terms of expected improvement in the egg/smolt survival stage of the anadromous salmonid lifecycle. The Accords also describe expected gains in watershed functionality, but do not specify methodologies or performance standards to be used to measure this change. The number of smolts per spawner is an initial fish metric that the Tribal Data Network proposes to coordinate and assist tribes in producing. The individual tribes have indicated that they will be responsible for monitoring in the tributaries. From a data perspective, the number of smolts per spawner is a metric that could provide an excellent opportunity to detect changes due to tributary habitat improvement, excluding the effects of the hydrosystem. Metrics and indicators such as Smolt to Adult Ratios (SARs), adult to adult ratios, and adult abundance will be influenced by survival through the hydrosystem and ocean stages of the anadromous salmonid lifecycle. The Fish Passage Center, Columbia Basin Research, and individual member tribes will be calculate SARs complementary to the opportunistic data management focus of the Inter-Tribal Monitoring Data Project. We have proposed to the tribes that they consider the number of smolts per spawner as a metric with a very fast Return On Investment (ROI) and therefore the best cost/benefit ratio to use when evaluating the fish response to changes in tributary habitat, particularly due to Accords funded mitigation projects. However, that is not the role of this project, this project assists the tribes with technical work, not with policy work. The current direction of the tribes is to create expert panels to identify and summarize the change brought about from Accords projects. Going forward, more quantitative life stage survival data should be collected and managed, especially smolt abundance data in order to produce the egg-smolt survival metrics specified in the Accords. NOAA's VSP recommendation to assemble 12 brood years of Recruit/Spawner ratios to measure productivity take into account the effects of the hydrosystem when measuring productivity, whereas the number of smolts per spawner would exclude most effects of the hydrosystem and is therefore more sensitive to effects of habitat restoration in the tributaries. In terms of habitat restoration, data on limiting factors and changes in limiting factors needs to be managed. Fish data is less noisy when the fish are moving, in other words, the best chance to obtain estimates with tight confidence intervals for anadromous fish is when they are moving through a point where they can all be counted as smolts or as adults. (I.E. a hard count) Although the tribes plan to eventually monitor and manage anadromous salmonids from gravel to gravel, and the Accords specify expected benefits in terms of improvement to egg-smolt survival, measuring the number of smolts per spawner is an efficient and cost effective preliminary focal point for beginning the monitoring in the tributaries, since it provides the best chance for detecting changes in survival due to changes in habitat. For more details see the Tribal Data Network design document. Egg-smolt survival estimates can be reported; 1) at the watershed scale specified in the Accords, 2) the population scale specified in the BiOp, 3) per tributary, per reach, or per spawning area. The Population Crosswalk project is an initial attempt to address the different scales of the required estimates. The tribes have asked the ITMD to assist their Accords efforts by building web based retrospective and prospective tools to facilitate the management of data for the expert panel process. The ITMD has assisted the Yakama Nation to build data management tools for the Rapid Aquatic Habitat Assessment Protocol (RAHAP), which going forward may become part of the prospective Accords tool set and assist in the provision of cost-effective fish and habitat monitoring data.$30,0004.68%09/15/201609/14/2017
G172815160Create/Manage/Maintain DatabaseExploratory development and maintenance of databases of legacy data (ongoing)As needs are identified and opportunities are presented, acquire legacy monitoring data from tribal managers and co-managers and develop and organize databases for its storage, distribution, and maintenance.$30,0004.68%09/15/201609/14/2017
H172816160Create/Manage/Maintain DatabaseExploratory development of (ISO19115) metadata and other metadata (ongoing)Assist contractors to produce metadata for their data sets and projects when feasible and as resources are freed up due to unforeseen efficiencies of the project. Explore the issues associated with implementation of metadata standards promoted by PNAMP, the Coordinated Assessments, the ESRI Corporation, the Federal Geospatial Metadata Clearinghouse, and Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) to share metadata. Explore the feasibility of developing a V39.50 server interface using the z39.85 protocol to integrate the StreamNet Library card catalog with a tribal/regional metadata clearinghouse such as www.monitoringmethods.org. Explore the metadata features inherent in the ESRI Arc Server Spatial Database Engine (SDE). Explore the applicability of the current Open Archive Initiative (OAI) XML format used by libraries for metadata and card catalogs. In addition; explore opportunities to integrate the CDMS with existing project level metadata records in the www.monitoringresources.org, www.monitoringmethods.org, and https://www.cbfish.org.$30,0004.68%09/15/201609/14/2017
I172817160Create/Manage/Maintain DatabaseUpdate Tribal Network design as needed, as CDMS implementation occurs across the four tribes.As the Central Database Management System infrastructure build outs proceed among the three tribes (Nez Perce Tribe, Yakama Nation, and CTWSRO), update the design of the tribal data network as needed, and document those changes.$15,0002.34%09/15/201609/14/2017
J172818122Provide Technical Review and RecommendationTest and Evaluate New Technologies to improve data management (ongoing)Produce review of any other new technology found to be useful in pilot projects.$25,0003.90%09/15/201609/14/2017
K172819119Manage and Administer ProjectsAdminister ContractRoutine contract administration as required by BPA and the sponsor.$15,0002.34%09/15/201609/14/2017
L172820141Produce Other ReportsOther Reports for BPAWorking with Sub contractors and tribal staff that are made available as immediate data management needs are addressed and staff resources are freed up: The CRITFC ITMD will develop and refine data management strategies with CRITFC and their tribal partners with respect to the Coordinated Assessments for Fish Abundance as well as for Hatchery and Habitat Data.$7,5001.17%09/15/201609/14/2017
M172821141Produce Other ReportsOther Reports for BPACRITFC will work with Tribal partners to identify sensitive data sharing issues and identify an appropriate regional forum (e.g. PNAMP, ITMD Workshop, StreamNet, Coordinated Assessment or other) to discuss these and other data sharing issues with regional natural resource managers.$7,5001.17%09/15/201609/14/2017
N172822202Produce BiOp RPA ReportBiOp RPA Report for CY 2015Projects that have claimed that they support one or more RM&E RPAs (i.e., RPAs 50-73) under the FCRPS BiOp are required to report their results. To facilitate the summary of these results across the entire Columbia River Basin, and to provide more clarity as to the format required under the BiOp, these reports are required to be completed online. If desired, the required information can be prepared in MS Word, and pasted into Taurus. For more guidance see https://www.cbfish.org/Content/tutorials/Reporting_Guidance_BiOp_2013.pdf.$7,5001.17%09/15/201603/14/2017
O172823132Produce Progress (Annual) ReportSubmit Progress Report for the period 01/01/2016 to 012/31/2016The progress report summarizes the project goal, objectives, hypotheses, completed and uncompleted deliverables, problems encountered, lessons learned, and long-term planning. Examples of long-term planning include future improvements, new directions, or level of effort for contract implementation, including any ramping up or ramping down of contract components or of the project as a whole. The report will include details of accomplishments for each work element in the contract and will succinctly document contract performance for the public record. Progress reports must conform to BPA guidelines. See the ''formatting guidelines'' link at the Technical Reports and Publications page: https://www.cbfish.org/Help.mvc/GuidanceDocuments.$7,5001.17%09/15/201603/15/2017
P172824159Transfer/Consolidate Regionally Standardized DataShare data with other regional repositories1. Exploratory development of CRITFC Snorkel Survey data exchange with the AEM Database depending on feasibility. Initial exploration has resulted in the determination that the CRITFC Snorkel Survey database has been converted to MS Access and turned over to ODFW for hosting and management. This part of the work element is no longer feasible, for the Snorkel Survey data is no longer under CRITFC control. 2. Host and exchange Key GIS data on ARC GIS server and exchange with PSMFC, and Sitka Data systems if feasible. Feasibility will depend on the existence of a well documented interface or a well documented Data Exchange Standard produced by PSMFC and/or Sitka. 3. Provide tribal biologists assistance in identifying proper data repositories to store data.$50,5817.89%09/15/201609/14/2017
      
$640,934
   

Deliverable Title WSE Sort Letter, Number, Title Start End Concluded
Attend coordinated assessment meetings, workshops, and hold at least one tribal data workshop. B: 189. Attend coordinated assessment meetings, workshops, and hold at least 1 tribal data workshop 09/14/2017 09/14/2017
Updated Inventory of selected existing data projects and assessment of tribal data needs C: 114. Update tribal needs assessment and selection of existing data projects as needed (ongoing) 09/14/2017 09/14/2017
Update Pilot Implementations D: 160. Update Pilot Implementations (ongoing) 09/14/2017 09/14/2017
Data management tools developed and/or updated to meet tribal needs E: 160. Data management tools developed and/or updated and/or identified to meet tribal needs. 09/14/2017 09/14/2017
Update and Maintain Accords Database (ongoing) F: 160. Update and Maintain Accords Database (ongoing) 09/14/2017 09/14/2017
Maintain databases and consolidate, curate and manage legacy data as opportunities arrive. G: 160. Exploratory development and maintenance of databases of legacy data (ongoing) 09/14/2017 09/14/2017
Exploratory development of metadata H: 160. Exploratory development of (ISO19115) metadata and other metadata (ongoing) 09/14/2017 09/14/2017
Updated tribal data network design as needed as CDMS is implemented across the member tribes. I: 160. Update Tribal Network design as needed, as CDMS implementation occurs across the four tribes. 09/14/2017 09/14/2017
Produce reviews of new technologies used in pilots to improve data management J: 122. Test and Evaluate New Technologies to improve data management (ongoing) 09/14/2017 09/14/2017
All administrative tasks fulfilled with timely quality products K: 119. Administer Contract 09/14/2017 09/14/2017
Assist tribes to develop a data management strategies L: 141. Other Reports for BPA 09/14/2017 09/14/2017
Make progress assisting the tribes to develop data sharing agreements M: 141. Other Reports for BPA 09/14/2017 09/14/2017
Submit BiOp RPA Report in Taurus N: 202. BiOp RPA Report for CY 2015 03/14/2017 04/28/2017
Annual Progress Report to BPA for Calendar year 2016 Jan-Dec O: 132. Submit Progress Report for the period 01/01/2016 to 012/31/2016 01/16/2017 01/16/2017
Share data with other regional repositories P: 159. Share data with other regional repositories 09/14/2017 09/14/2017

Viewing of Implementation Metrics
Loading...
Sort Order
WE ID
Work Element Name
Title
Description
Metric ID
Metric
End Fiscal Year
Planned
Actual
Contractor Comments
All Measures
Annual Progress Report Measures
Populations
Viewing of Environmental Metrics Customize
Loading...
WSE ID
WSE Start
WSE End
WE ID
Title
WSE Progress
Study Plan
Protocol
Category
Subcategory
Focus 1
Focus 2
Specific Metric Title

Primary Focal Species Work Statement Elements
Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Deschutes River Summer/Fall ESU
  • 1 instance of WE 114 Identify and Select Projects
  • 1 instance of WE 159 Transfer/Consolidate Regionally Standardized Data
Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Lower Columbia River ESU (Threatened)
  • 1 instance of WE 114 Identify and Select Projects
Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Mid-Columbia River Spring ESU
  • 1 instance of WE 159 Transfer/Consolidate Regionally Standardized Data
Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Snake River Fall ESU (Threatened)
  • 1 instance of WE 114 Identify and Select Projects
  • 1 instance of WE 159 Transfer/Consolidate Regionally Standardized Data
Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Snake River Spring/Summer ESU (Threatened)
  • 1 instance of WE 114 Identify and Select Projects
  • 1 instance of WE 159 Transfer/Consolidate Regionally Standardized Data
Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Upper Columbia River Spring ESU (Endangered)
  • 1 instance of WE 159 Transfer/Consolidate Regionally Standardized Data
Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) - All Populations
  • 1 instance of WE 159 Transfer/Consolidate Regionally Standardized Data
Sturgeon, White (A. transmontanus) - Lower Columbia River
  • 1 instance of WE 114 Identify and Select Projects
  • 1 instance of WE 159 Transfer/Consolidate Regionally Standardized Data

Sort WE ID WE Title NEPA NOAA USFWS NHPA Has Provisions Inadvertent Discovery Completed
A 185 Periodic Status Reports for BPA 09/15/2016
B 189 Attend coordinated assessment meetings, workshops, and hold at least 1 tribal data workshop 09/15/2016
C 114 Update tribal needs assessment and selection of existing data projects as needed (ongoing) 09/15/2016
D 160 Update Pilot Implementations (ongoing) 09/15/2016
E 160 Data management tools developed and/or updated and/or identified to meet tribal needs. 09/15/2016
F 160 Update and Maintain Accords Database (ongoing) 09/15/2016
G 160 Exploratory development and maintenance of databases of legacy data (ongoing) 09/15/2016
H 160 Exploratory development of (ISO19115) metadata and other metadata (ongoing) 09/15/2016
I 160 Update Tribal Network design as needed, as CDMS implementation occurs across the four tribes. 09/15/2016
J 122 Test and Evaluate New Technologies to improve data management (ongoing) 09/15/2016
K 119 Administer Contract 09/15/2016
L 141 Other Reports for BPA 09/15/2016
M 141 Other Reports for BPA 09/15/2016
N 202 BiOp RPA Report for CY 2015
O 132 Submit Progress Report for the period 01/01/2016 to 012/31/2016 09/15/2016
P 159 Share data with other regional repositories 09/15/2016